US Muslim Population Figures: Fact and Fiction

I realize you will all be shocked and outraged that the PC left has grossly exaggerated the numbers of muslims in the US but think positively. Between Doc and myself I think we can handle them. Unlike liberal politicians we refuse to bend to muslim pressure, be intimidated by them and much like liberal politicians we also will not just go away. This is a good news article. It shows muslims are rare in the USA when compared to other groups and should show even stupid politicians there is no need to kiss up to them. Poor muslims they just do not have enough votes to influence anyone.

jpost
by David Harris
May 24 2007
On May 22, 2007, the respected Pew Research Center issued the results from “the first-ever, nationwide, random sample survey of Muslim Americans.” Among the study’s striking findings: the US Muslim population was estimated at 2.35 million.
No doubt, to some this estimate comes as a shock.
For more than a decade, absent census data on religious affiliation, the figure has been the source of speculation and, yes, brazen manipulation. Knowingly or not, many government officials, scholars and media outlets, have bandied about as articles of faith exaggerated numbers of American Muslims.
Judge for yourself:
A 1996 article in the notoriously anti-Israel Washington Report on Middle East Affairs declared: “According to Dr. Sayyid Syeed, secretary-general of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), there are between 6 and 8 million Muslims in the United States today. The New York Times, which has its own agenda, placed the number between 2 and 4 million two years ago. Dr. Diana Eck, who is working on the subject at Harvard University, believes the correct figure is somewhere in between.”
In 1997, the Britannica Yearbook was cited on a New York Times Company-owned website (About.com) as the source for the figure of 5.53 million Muslims living in North America.
In April 2001, a project involving the Hartford Institute for Religious Research and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) led to the publication of The Mosque in America: A National Portrait. The lead researcher, Ihsan Bagby, a professor of international relations at Shaw University and a CAIR board member, reportedly had no training as a demographer. That didn’t stop him from presenting his “guesstimation” of 6-7 million Muslims in the US.
On September 30, 2001, USA Today, in an article on Islam and Arab-Americans, reported, without naming a source, that “an estimated 7 million Muslims live in the USA.”
In the September/October 2003 issue of Islamic Horizons, published in the US, Ilyas Ba-Yunus, a demographer at the State University of New York at Cortland, declared that “there are close to 10 million North American Muslims.” In 1997, in a publication for the East-West University, he had estimated the number at 6.7 million.
In 2004, a book entitled Muslims’ Place in the American Public Square and associated with Georgetown University, declared that “at least 6.5 million Muslims live in the United States.”
A report entitled “The Diversity of Muslims in the United States,” published in 2006 by the United States Institute of Peace, noted that, “There are approximately 6 to 7.5 million Muslims in the United States who identify themselves as Americans.”
An August 27, 2006 article in the Washington Post on American Muslim assimilation stated that there are “approximately 6 million Muslims in the United States.”
On January 17, 2007, Investor’s Business Daily addressed the demographic issue in an article entitled “The 8-million Muslim Lie.” It cited a spokeswoman for the Muslim Advancement Society boasting on CNN that “there are 8 million Muslims in America now” and a Muslim chaplain in the Marine Corps asserting that “today, 8 to 10 million Muslims live in the United States.” Then, in a rare instance of media courage, it challenged these claims as “wildly inflated” and astutely added that “politicians in Washington are intimidated by the figure.”
Visit the Public Broadcasting Service website and check out the “Frontline” discussion of frequently asked questions about Muslims and the Islamic faith. To the question “How many Muslims are there in the United States?”, the response is, “Estimates range that between five to 12 million Muslims live in the United States.”
At one point, even former President Bill Clinton used a figure of seven million, while National Public Radio has more than once spoken of six million Muslims in the United States.
Will the Pew estimate of 2.35 million now take hold? Don’t hold your breath.
In the late 1990s, AJC began approaching several mainstream media outlets to ask why they routinely cited numbers that appeared grossly exaggerated, often came from groups with dubious political agendas, and surely couldn’t withstand closer scrutiny.
Most answers fell into one of three categories: (i) lazy journalism; (ii) fear of risking a confrontation with Muslim groups; or (iii) an inquiry from a Jewish group, no matter how the issue was framed, was deemed dead on arrival.
Bottom line: we had zero impact.
In 2001, we went the next step, knowing full well that, as a Jewish organization and notwithstanding our longstanding reputation for solid research, we’d be potentially vulnerable to attack. But no other institution stepped forward, so we forged ahead.
We approached an academic heavyweight, Dr. Tom W. Smith, the director of the General Social Survey at the National Opinion Research Center of the University of Chicago, whose scholarly integrity and impartiality were beyond dispute. He was asked to examine the available literature on the US Muslim population.
In October 2001, he reported his findings: “Since the September 11 terrorist attacks, the media have used estimates of the Muslim population in the United States of 5-8 million, with an average of 6.7 million or 2.4 percent of the population.” In the previous five years, 1996-2001, he looked at 20 estimates and they averaged out to 5.65 million.
After thoroughly studying all available data and the methodologies used, Dr. Smith concluded: “The best, adjusted, survey-based estimates put the adult Muslim population in 2000 at 0.67 percent, or 1,401,000, and the total Muslim population at 1,886,000. Even if high-side estimates based on local surveys, figures from mosques, and ancestry and immigration statistics are given more weight than survey-based numbers, it is hard to accept estimates that Muslims constitute more than 1 percent of the population (2,090,000 adults or 2,814,000 total).”
Unbeknownst to AJC at the time, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York (CUNY) was completing its 2001 omnibus American Religious Identification Survey. The results were strikingly similar to those of Dr. Smith. The survey found 1,104,000 adult Muslims in the U.S. Allowing for undercounting or sampling error, the survey suggested that the uppermost range would be 2.2 million to just under 3 million.
The studies were widely reported on at the time, including major stories by the New York Times and Washington Post.
The assault from those invested in the higher numbers was immediate.
The American Muslim Council accused Smith of trying to “deny the existence of four-and-a-half million American Muslims” and “tearing at the heart of America,” while claiming that its own figure of 7 million Muslims emerged from the most recent U.S. Census—an impossibility since the Census does not ask about religious affiliation. Meanwhile, CAIR described the Smith study as a “desperate attempt to discount the role of American Muslims.” Its spokesman went on to declare that, “Very often the representatives of the extremist wing of the pro-Israel lobby, such as the American Jewish Committee, seek to block Muslim political participation.”
The AJC-sponsored and CUNY studies couldn’t easily be attacked on scientific grounds. That didn’t stop others, though, from continuing to repeat the outlandishly exaggerated numbers ad nauseum, or wielding the “Islamophobia” charge against anyone who dared use the reports’ figures.
To a large degree, those twin strategies worked. Look again at the examples cited above from 2002 onward, after the studies appeared.
Now a third study has been released. Pew has a well-earned reputation for quality research. Will its findings change things?
What will the New York Times, National Public Radio, the Public Broadcasting System, USA Today, Encyclopedia Brittanica, elected officials, and scholars at Georgetown and Harvard universities, among others, say the next time they’re in need of US Muslim population numbers?
Will they now cite the three authoritative and convergent studies on the subject? Or the exaggerated and politically-motivated numbers afloat out there? Or simply split the difference, convincing themselves that this is the “fairest” approach?
Stay tuned.

Explore posts in the same categories: Analysis, Good News, Muslims in The USA, anti dhimmitude

20 Comments on “US Muslim Population Figures: Fact and Fiction”


  1. Well, that should come as good news for CAIR because it means that my previous post on Muslim population statistics v.s. CAIR membership is wrong.

    http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2007/05/24/cair-only-represents-1-out-of-every-1680-muslims-in-the-us

    Instead of CAIR representing 1 in 1,680 American Muslims (using the 8 million U.S. Muslims statistic), they actually represent (if we go with the new estimate of 2.35 million U.S. Muslims) a whopping 1 in 494 American Muslims.

    See, CAIR needs to stop whining and concentrate on spinning this to their advantage. But, maybe they’re just too stupid to do the math…

  2. Omar H Says:

    This post just shows how afraid you are of Muslims. In your spare time you need to count Muslims, why? Do you have nothing better to do, why not Understand Islam, become friends with Muslime instead of tryingto oust them. You will be shocked to know that Muslims in the US are quite friendly and Don’t hire statisticians to discount the number of Jews or Christians in the US.

  3. Ronin Says:

    I can not speak for Doc but I know I have no fear of Muslims, they simply disgust me. We in the US are well aware of “friendly muslims” the 9/11 skyjackers, the beltway sniper, the punks with the bombs in their cars, the punks in California and the list goes on and on.

  4. Mohammad Says:

    This is a sad post full of hatred and bigotry. I encourage readers to learn more about Islam and Muslims. I invite you to read up on Islam on Wikipedia and to strike up a conversation the next time you see a Muslim. I am certain that your fears will be dispelled and you will walk away feeling safer about your society because Muslims are a part of it.

  5. LH Says:

    The “prophet Mohammad” was a murder, a torturer, a thief, a rapist, a liar and a pedophile. Hmmmmm. Why would anyone with a clear moral direction follow such a man. Is there evil in your heart?

    • TRUE BELIEVER Says:

      Prophet Muhammed brought NOTHING But the TRUTH. Read Quran and the miracles of the Quran, especially about the sea that has both salty and sweet water and that does not mix together. It’s found somewhere in the middle east. It’s mentioned in the Quran as a PROOF to mankind that THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD TO WORSHIP and that GOD does not have any partner, He is the first and the last, He is the creator of this universe, He begets not, nor He was begotten, nothing like unto Him.

  6. Ronin Says:

    He also had sex with a dead woman maybe that attracts them?

  7. Leatherneck Says:

    That reads like one sick moon god worshiper. To think people would actually follow such a perv. I guess they can’t read.

  8. Mullah Lodabullah Says:

    “… you will walk away feeling safer about
    your society because Muslims are a part of it.”

    “Death to those who insult false prophet”
    “Death to all (zionist) juice”
    “Behead those who insult islam”

    Yes, I feel safer already. How much safer will I feel
    after God destroys nations like Iran, Syria, Libya etc.

  9. Akira Says:

    Omar: “how afraid you are of Muslims”

    No more than of any other virus

    Omar: “you need to count Muslims, why?”

    Just like the zombies in a video game. “Got that one. Don’t miss that one!”

    Omar: “why not Understand Islam”

    I’m trying to spread the word, like one crying in the wilderness: “Understand the disease!”

    Omar: “become friends with Muslime instead of tryingto oust them”

    But Moozlims are forbidden to befriends Christians or Jews, and are just supposed to exterminate the rest. That makes friendships a wee bit awkward…

    Omar: “You will be shocked to know that Muslims in the US are quite friendly”

    Yes. Shocking! Anyway, why do you assume that people don’t know Moozlims? Has it occurred to you that people here have likely even gone to Moozlim-infested dumps and therefore are very familiar with the subject? Or that one needn’t necessarily know Moozlims to determine that the Koran etc is emetic? Of course many nominal Moozlims are friendly. Slaves are often docile.

    Omar: “Don’t hire statisticians to discount the number of Jews or Christians in the US.”

    I guess you mean people don’t, etc. But they do. Usually just out of curiosity, not for survival, as is the case with keeping track of the Moozlim infestation. Besides, if the number is ireelevant, then how come prominent Moozlims keep boastin about the extent of their infiltration?

    Moham [just a regular Moham, not The Pedophile Moham]: “This is a sad post full of hatred and bigotry.”

    Blah blah blah.

    Moham [just a regular Moham, not The Pedophile Moham]: “I encourage readers to learn more about Islam and Muslims.”

    Haven’t you been paying attention here?

    Moham [just a regular Moham, not The Pedophile Moham]: “I invite you to read up on Islam on Wikipedia”

    Why? Wikipedia whitewashes?

    Moham [just a regular Moham, not The Pedophile Moham]: “strike up a conversation the next time you see a Muslim”

    Yeah, that worked wonders for Daniel Pearl.

    Moham [just a regular Moham, not The Pedophile Moham]: “”I am certain that your fears will be dispelled and you will walk away feeling safer about your society because Muslims are a part of it.”

    Ha ha. Good one! Who are you, Tony Blair? The number one Jihadi, George “Islam is a Religion of Peace” Bush? Confess!

  10. Akira Says:

    Moham [just a regular Moham, not The Pedophile Moham]:

    “I invite you to read up on Islam on Wikipedia”

    Yep. Just took a quick survey of Wikipedia on Islam, Jihad, Moham the Barbarian, Aisha, etc., and yes, it’s all pretty much whitewashed

    Here’s a passage you missed. You’d better hurry over there and edit it out!

    “According to the traditional sources, Aisha was six or seven years old when betrothed to Muhammad. American historian Denise Spellberg states that “these specific references to the bride’s age reinforce Aisha’s pre-menarcheal status and, implicitly, her virginity.” She stayed in her parents’ home until the age of nine, when the marriage was consummated. The marriage was delayed until after the Hijra, or migration to Medina, in 622; Aisha and her older sister Asma bint Abi Bakr only moved to Medina after Muhammad had already migrated there. After this, the wedding was celebrated very simply. The sources do not offer much more information about Aisha’s childhood years, but mention that after the wedding, she continued to play with her toys, and Muhammad entered into the spirit of these games.”

    Awww, isn’t that sweet. The dirty old pervert played with her toys after raping her… Heartwarming…

  11. Akira Says:

    More wikipedia.

    Obviously edited by non-wahhabi:

    “In 1801 and 1802, the Saudi Wahhabists under Abdul Aziz ibn Muhammad ibn Saud attacked and captured the holy Shia cities of Karbala and Najaf in Iraq, massacred the Shiites and destroyed the tombs of the Shiite Imam Husayn and Ali bin Abu Talib. In 1802 they occupied Taif where they massacred the population. In 1803 and 1804 the Wahhabis captured Mecca and Medina, destroying monuments and various holy Muslim sites and shrines, such as the shrine built over the tomb of Fatima Zahra, the daughter of Muhammad, and even intended to destroy the grave of Muhammad himself”

    Look, better edit this out. Too much truth!

    “Suleiman the Magnificent began a series of military conquests in Europe.[64] On August 29, 1526, he defeated Louis II of Hungary (1516–26) at the battle of Mohács. In its wake, Hungarian resistance collapsed and the Ottoman Empire became the preeminent power in Central and Eastern Europe.[65] In July 1683 Sultan Mehmet IV proclaimed a Jihad and the Turkish grand vizier, Kara Mustafa Pasha, laid siege to the Vienna with an army of 138,000 men”

    Too much truth (at least the “Byzantines” [i.e. Rum] fought:

    “Following his accession to the Ottoman throne in 1451, Mehmed had been applying pressure on Constantinople and the Byzantines by building forts along the Dardanelles. On 5 April, he laid siege to Constantinople with an army numbering 80,000 to 200,000 men. The city was defended by an army of 7,000 of whom 2,000 were foreigners. The siege began with heavy Ottoman artilery firing at the city’s walls while a smaller Ottoman force captured the rest of the Byzantine strongholds in the area. Ottoman attempts to blockade the city completely failed at first owing to the boom blocking the entrance to the Golden Horn thus allowing four Christian ships to enter the city. Mehmed had his ships rolled into the Golden Horn on greased logs and a Byzantine effort to destroy the ships with fire ships failed, allowing the Ottomans to seal the city off.

    “The Turkish frontal assaults on the walls were all repulsed with heavy casaulities and the Turkish attempts to undermine the walls were all countered and abandoned. Mehmed’s offer to lift the siege, if he was given the city, was rejected. On 22 May, the moon rose in eclipse prophesying the fall of the city and a few days later Constantine received news that no Venetian relief fleet was coming. After midnight of the 29, the Ottoman army attacked the walls. The first wave of irregulars was thrown back. The second Turkish wave of Anatolians managed to breach the Blachernae section of walls. The defenders pushed back the Anatolians and managed to hold out against the Sultan’s elite Janissaries. During the fighting, the Genoese commander, Giovanni Giustiniani was fatally wounded and retreated to his ships with his men. The Emperor and his men continued to hold off the Turks until the Turks discovered an unlocked gate upon which they flooded into the city. Constantine reportedly fell leading a charge against the invaders, though his body was never found. The last defenders were subdued and the Turks proceeded to loot the city.

    “This battle marked the end of the Byzantine Empire, an empire which had lasted for over 1,100 years.”

    [Edit: "This battle marked the end of the Roman Empire, an empire which had lasted for over 1,497 years. (44 B.C. - 1453 Anno Domini]. And how long will the EU last before it officially becomes Eurabia?

    Or:

    “The Roman state lasted from 753 BC to the fall in 1461 of the Empire of Trebizond, for a total of 2,214 years. The EU lasted 62 years before becoming Eurabia.”

    Eurabia, an idea whose time has come, for a land whose time has passed.

    • iBelieve Says:

      YEA, actually wikepedia is a really whack site to look up things. anybody can just go there and post things. unless u read this from a hadith. that’s a REAL source. but yea dont base all your information on the internet please.

  12. islams not for me Says:

    true believer

    allah as you know it is not a god.

    the quran was not authored by muhammad but simply a long boring story that muhammad dreamed up and over the years became what it is.

    The quran is also not a book of science but stroy dreamed up by muhammad and copied by 42 different people since muhammad couldnt read or write.

    I have read the wuran and it is human amde using the guise of a god to tell humanity not of great things but how the will power of one individual.

    Read the book of mormon for a more interesting story than muhammad.

    • iBelieve Says:

      one question for you “Islams not for me”. If muhammad made “dreamed” of the whole “thing” (Quran) then why does the Quran talk about the stars and the moon and how they never over lap eachother? If he “dreamed” about the Quran why does it talk about the way a baby is in the mothers womb and how we are created? Also if he was a pedophile or rapist or a “violent man” or whatever you want to call him Ms/Mr Akira…then why, in the Quran, does it tells us to be kind to parents or to be a protector of women? Why would the quran say that women should COVER themselves? If Muhammed thought all of these things up. WHY would he tell women to COVER themselve if he was a PEDOPHILE, RAPIST, VIOLENT MAN! hOW WOULD HE KNOW THAT WE WERE MADE FROM A SINGLE CELL? MAYBE YOU DONT BELIEVE IN THIS BUT ITS TRUE.also to “islam is not for me” maybe because you read the english translation. of course THAT is hand made its just telling you what thes things mean in english. but the WORDS itself aren’t handmade. Even if it was handmade or “dreamt of” non of those men had that much knowledge to think of something so complex.


      • Yes, the Qur’an is a wonderful scientific tool for researchers.

        In fact, did you know that stars are not giant hydrogen fusion reactors, but actually missiles that are used to shoot down jinns?

        Qur’an 67:5

        And we have, (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with Lamps, and We have made such (Lamps) (as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones, and have prepared for them the Penalty of the Blazing Fire.

        And, who knew that when you witness a meteorite fall through the atmosphere, you are actually watching the jinn get shot at by those star missiles?

        Qur’an 15:16-18

        It is We Who have set out the zodiacal signs in the heavens, and made them fair-seeming to (all) beholders; And (moreover) We have guarded them from every evil spirit accursed: But any that gains a hearing by stealth, is pursued by a flaming fire, bright (to see).

        Yup, that’s some awesome science going on there.

  13. islams not for me Says:

    i believe

    Your making a typical mistake.

    Since when was muhammad a scientist or the quran a science book?

    Muhammad fathered children and watched thier progress from thier mothers womb. This would include the birth and even those sad times when a wife of his miscarried.

    Muhammad noticed the moon and stars. And he spoke his ‘revelations’ to his followers.

    Muhammad was not born in a time of science or technology. Like most people before and after his time he noticed how his body created children, The seasons of nature for his local area and the times of the moon rise and set.

    Yes I read a english translation of the quran. A book supposedly from a god is supposed to be translated and acted upon no matter what a persons language.

    The quran is clearly not based off of modern science. It is simply muhammads ‘revelations’ and of course those things he noticed in the natural world around him while he lived.

  14. Larry Shiver Says:

    Mooslims must be resisted actively. NYC has allowed mooslims to desecrate the deaths of our warriors at Ft. Hood. They have openly celebrated in the streets there with impunity. Mooslims above all things are cowards and killers of women, children and old men.

    We must lure the mooslims cockroaches into the open and smash them once and for all time. They are the spawn of Satan.


Comment: