California to ask Voters to Vote on a Withdrawal From Iraq
Yup, California is the tail that wags the dog… From Chuck DeVore (California State Assemblyman, 70th District) comes this interesting letter at the Red County OC Blog:
California legislature surrenders to al-Qaeda
Never before in my time in the Legislature have I been so upset and angry at a vote that was brought up on the floor. Yesterday afternoon we voted on a measure that has no legal standing and is completely unconstitutional, yet will kill American service members by emboldening our enemy.
The measure? Senate Bill 924, the Iraq surrender resolution by Don Perata.
(Yup, when I lived in California, we called him, “Don Piranha.” He’s a vicious little SOB.)
SB 924 will ask the voters of California whether we should “achieve the immediate, complete… withdrawal…” from Iraq, calling the “surge” “ill-conceived.”
I had no idea I was elected by the people of the 70th District to be the U.S. Secretary of Defense. Or, was it U.S. Secretary of State? The resolution also calls for “…diplomatic and nonmilitary assistance to promote peace and stability in Iraq and the Middle East.”
Most political analysts believe that Senator Perata schemed up this bill to increase liberal voter turnout for the February 2008 election, the election that will feature his cherished term limit extension initiative, allowing him to serve an extra four years in the Senate.
Just bringing this measure to the floor made me sick to my stomach as it has no legal effect. What it will do is serve as a propaganda tool for al-Qaeda. In this, if it is not vetoed by the Governor and makes it to the ballot, it will be similar to California’s 1982 nuclear freeze ballot initiative – which, of course, stopped the building of nuclear weapons by the evil Soviet Union and ended the Cold War – NOT. (Interesting side note, Assemblyman Martin Garrick’s father, retired Admiral Garrick, wrote the arguments against the nuclear freeze initiative. It passed by about 52 percent to 48 percent.)
I had a few words to say on this “ill-conceived” measure, both on the floor and to the media. NBC News quoted me in a piece as saying,
But the California legislature has no authority over American troops overseas — that is the role of the commander in chief. Republicans argued the resolution provides aid and comfort to the enemy, according to former National Guardsman and current Assemblyman Chuck Devore R-Irvine.
“It will be rebroadcast by Al Qaeda and the Al Qaeda mouthpieces and be used as proof of America’s moral weakness and quailing cowardice in the face of Islamic fascist terrorism,” Devore said.
(See: http://www.nbc11.com/news/13989769/detail.html)
All Republicans voted against the resolution, they were joined by Nicole Parra, Democrat from the Bakersfield area.
Please ask the Governor to veto SB 924.
All the best,
Chuck DeVore
State Assemblyman, 70th District
For a Liberal Rebuttal, check out The Liberal OC .
( Never let it be said that old Doc. Bulldog wasn’t “Fair” about doctrine.)
29 August, 2007 at 11:11 am
What a waste of time and money. Idiots like this have nothing better to do?
And by all means let’s extend term limits so morons like this guy can come up with more frivolous nonsense and aid the enemy in the process.
29 August, 2007 at 12:17 pm
Someone needs to take that guy out behind the woodshed and beat the living sh*t out of him, al Qaeda style. Lop off some hands, maybe his tongue, and send him on his merry way. That way, he will have a constant reminder of what it is he is supporting.
29 August, 2007 at 12:38 pm
GANDHI – Why aren’t you awarded a NOBEL man?
August 28th, 2007 by kanred
HI blogger land ,
im back with a question that haunts me all these days .
my question is why gandhi isnt awarded the Nobel.
doent he deserve that?
what a pity on part of the nobel commitee.
shame upon you.
and i question the UNO, why is he selected as person of the decade by it?
GANDHI’S method of nonvoilence in fighting any cause needs no explaination.
and is he rejected just as he is from third world country
or as every one thinks , did british oppose the decision to give a nobel to gandhi?
or deosnt he really deserve itfor his methods of truth and nonvoilence known as satyagraha?
whatever be it man ……..we miss him and his principles right now in this terror struk world?
IT DOESNT MATTER FAOR GANDHI AND TO THE WORLD IF HIS AWARDED OR NOT AS VIRTUE OR A TALENT DOESNT REQUIRE ANY APPRECIATION .IT SHINES BY IT SLEF.
i can affirm that no other person(i mean a nobel laureate in peace) is well known as is Mr. MAHATHMA GANDHI.
and by this single thing how can NOBEL committee boast itself as the premier amongst its counterpart awarding agencies.
shame with the BRITISH and shame with the NOBEL COMMITTEE.
P;EASE PROVIDE YOUR VALUABLE COMMENTS TO THIS BLOG SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE THIS …..
THANK YOU.
RAMAKANTH REDDY.
your priciples are very much required now, Mahathma in our present world.
29 August, 2007 at 4:58 pm
He’s gay.
29 August, 2007 at 5:34 pm
Uhm, we are talking about Piranha here, I hope?
29 August, 2007 at 7:47 pm
Well if Arafat can get it, I suppose old Gandhi should have gotten one. Now, back to the subject at hand.
Don is a gay pinko.
29 August, 2007 at 9:51 pm
LOL
Cheers