Long Island “Mosque Official” Arrested for Sexual Assault on 13-year-old Boy
Mosque Official Charged With Sexually Assaulting Boy, 13
July 24, 2008 – WNBC
NEW YORK — Suffolk County police have arrested a 53-year-old man in connection with the sexual abuse of a teenage boy in Long Island.
Niamatullah Ibrahim, of Selden, was charged with sexual abuse in the first degree and aggravated sexual abuse in the third-degree after a month-long police investigation led to his arrest on Tuesday.
Ibrahim works in the Selden Mosque of the Islamic Association of Long Island as a religious official. The 13-year-old boy he is accused of assaulting was attending some type of religious instruction at the mosque over a period of time, police said.
Ibrahim was arraigned Wednesday at First District Court in Central Islip. He has been suspended without pay, according to Newsday.
Police said they are investigating whether any other allegations of assault against Ibrahim exist, but said they have no reason to believe that is the case.
Detectives are asking anyone with information regarding the incident to call the sixth squad at (631) 854-8652 or Crime Stoppers at (800)-220-TIPS.
28 July, 2008 at 3:06 pm
and ONE more thing, Bulldog,
You may find it laughable that I’m actually trying to use common sense and’MATH’ (Holy cvrap anything but math and science) to refute your really really nonsensical and construed views of Islam. If your the voice of conservatism on this blog, then I salute on that one considering you are amongs the very best likes of Hannity, Limbaugh and Savage.
28 July, 2008 at 3:19 pm
OZ,
Please refrain from including the false Koran with the Bible. The Koran, and those who follow it or worshiping a false moon god called Allah, or Sin. You do not have to believe me, just Google Allah, or moon god and you can read the archeology which proves Islam is a false religion.
I just love Dr. Savage. His freedom of speech is under attack because Muslims from CAIR do not like the truth to be told about Islam.
“Death to those who insult Islam.” Do you remember that sign? Dr. Bulldog has it posted here for the world to see.
ROPMA
28 July, 2008 at 4:35 pm
Do not worry about the troll. Minions themselves have been attempting to whitewash over the pedophile kings crimes for generations. Until he has a following and a degree from a real minion university his opinion means less than snail shit, especially to minions. All the mainstream mullahs, imams and other real pedophile king worshipers have already admitted the pedophile king took advantage of a child. Considering the rest of his lifestyle being a pedophile was a minor crime. One little girl among many did not excuse the other crimes or the rapes of small boys. Call him whatever you want mohammed was a twisted sick son of a bitch.
28 July, 2008 at 5:08 pm
Oz,
“Holy cvrap anything but math and science”
LOL! My Ph.d is in Theoretical Physics.
The point I was making was that you were using “nebulous” sources and logic for the basis of your mathematics – the same “nebulous” sources (Hadiths) that you accuse me of using.
You said, “Ayesha (ra) accompanied the Muslims in the battle of Badr and Uhud. Furthermore, it is also reported in books of hadith and history that no one under the age of 15 years was allowed to take part in the battle of Uhud. All the boys below 15 years of age were sent back. Ayesha’s (ra) participation in the battle of Badr and Uhud clearly indicate that she was not nine or ten years old at that time.”
The “boys” is the operative word. Aisha was obviously not a “boy,” therefore, she was not there to engage in the battle – only the males engaged in the battles. So, it is a weak argument in determining her age and does not “clearly” indicate anything. It only indicates that she accompanied Muhammad during his murderous campaigns.
Also, since Muhammad often went against his own pronouncements (such as allowing himself more wives than he allocated for other Muslims), it is a specious and weak argument to say that Muhammad couldn’t have brought Aisha along for his own “pleasure” just because the other wives weren’t allowed on to come along on the Jihad.
You also said, “It is reported in Taqri’bu’l-tehzi’b as well as Al-bidayah wa’l-nihayah that Asma died in 73 hijrah when she was 100 years old. Now, obviously if Asma was 100 years old in 73 hijrah she should have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah. If Asma was 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah, Ayesha should have been 17 or 18 years old at that time. So Ayesha, if she got married in 1 AH (after hijrah) or 2 AH, was between 18 to 20 years old at the time of her marriage.”
100 years old is an awfully suspicious number…
I highly doubt Asma was exactly 100 years old when she died… To a younger person, a 90 year old Asma might look to be 100 years old, and, as there were no birth certificates, it is all conjecture…
Here, let me help you out with your cheat sheet from http://www.understanding-islam.com/ri/mi-004.htm.
You will note that the author from whom you are channeling (plagiarizing?) also includes this little ditty:
“According to Ibn Hajar, Fatimah (ra) was five years older than Ayesha (ra). Fatimah (ra) is reported to have been born when the Prophet (pbuh) was 35 years old. Thus, even if this information is taken to be correct, Ayesha (ra) could by no means be less than 14 years old at the time of hijrah, and 15 or 16 years old at the time of her marriage.”
So, let’s do the math on that “nebulous” source:
Fatimah is supposedly five years older than Aisha.
Fatimah was born when the Prophet was 35 years old.
That means that Aisha was 40 years younger than Muhammad (35 + 5 = 40)
According to most sources, the age of Muhammad when he married Aisha – 54 years old.
So, that means that Aisha would have to be a very mature 14 years old (54 – 40 = 14) when she married Muhammad.
Well, that can’t be correct! Because, it does not equal yours and the author’s (from which you plagiarized) 18-20 years old theory using Asma’s age as a reference, nor does it match the author’s other theory of 15 to 16 years old.
So, like I said, you are using nebulous logic in your math. It is not precise enough, nor is it solid enough to be used as a foundation for an argument.
And, as I tried to tell you, it just doesn’t matter what you or I think. It matters what the overwhelming majority of Muslims think, and that is that Aisha was six or seven years old when a 54 year old Muhammad married her, and she was nine years old when a 57 year old Muhammad “consummated” the marriage.
Now, instead of wasting your time on us infidels, why don’t you use your time more constructively and attempt to convince the majority of the Muslim population that Aisha was much older than nine years old when Muhammad had sex with her.
Here’s an Islamic scholar in need of your guidance:
IslamQA
After that, you might consider “correcting” the Wikipedia entry for Aisha so that all those poor Muslims and infidels won’t be mislead into thinking Muhammad was a pedophile:
Wikipedia/Aisha
Cheers
28 July, 2008 at 5:23 pm
Doctor Bulldog:
“Sunnis and Shias accept these Hadiths as being true” – and that’s why you have the age when girls can be married off down to 9 in Iran, (the first thing the Ayatollah Khomeini implemented after he deposed the Shah 30 years ago) and In Yemen they didn’t dare to make a law against it because its against the profits teaching, the same in Pakistan and in how many other Islamo-crapholes? On top of this we have videos of many Sowdi, Egyptian and other Islamic headbangers (clerics) who proudly proclaim that ‘peace and blessings and great rewards’ will be bestowed on mothers who marry off their daughters before ‘they see their first blood’.
Along comes another taqiyya spin-meister who tries to paint a pussy on your cheek. Oh well, its their religious duty to deceive infidels, if he Oz really had a problem with it, wouldn’t he then try to talk his co-religionists out of it instead of trying to pull the Islamic wool over infidel eyes and ears?
29 July, 2008 at 5:44 pm
On adnkronos today:
Morocco: Child marriages continue despite law to curb practice:
…. various imams and Islamic politicians protested against the legitimacy of the Mudawana (the Family Law), accusing it of violating Sharia or Islamic law which they say puts no limits on the age for marriage.
….over 38,000 applications (accepted for derogation), 379 involved marriage with a male child below the age of 18. The rest of the applications were for unions with female minors….
Morocco: Child marriages continue despite law to curb practice:
http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/CultureAndMedia/?id=1.0.2375314024
16 December, 2008 at 8:32 pm
how many times have catholic priests raped kids? hitler? crimes today? rape? murder? You punished your perverts we reward ours. Let children fear islam. We are number one, we rape and murder more than anyone.
16 December, 2008 at 8:34 pm
plus, yes Muhammad did marry a 9 year old and raped her… We realize you read our koran, mohammed was a perv and a pedophile
16 December, 2008 at 10:06 pm
ignora-muz
You know nohitng of isl-ame dont you. Almost all of us have read the quran and many of the hadiths.
moo-ham-ed not only married aisha but had sexual relations with a child. In our day and age he is considered a ped-ophile.
As for the Catholics and other subjects yes there are some stupid people in leadership. But the same can be said for the imams and other islamic leaders.
17 December, 2008 at 4:24 am
ignorant muslim,
We already know that islam unlike every other religion praises perverts and follows the example set by the worlds most famous pedophile. Islam protects are rewards it deviants, where others turn them in and punish them.
We also have very strict posting guidelines, next time you might want to read them before making an ass out of yourself.
The moral equivalency argument from a muslim is beyond stupid, islams record for sexual violence will never be broken by anyone. Most muslims first sexual experience is with an older male relative, the sex cult thrives. I have yet to see a single thing about islam I do not find morally offensive. I am glad we agree on at least that.
Cheers