Nancy “The Wraith” Pelosi Defends Funding Planned Barren-hood via Economic Stimulus Package
More proof that the Commiecrats are using the stimulus package as a Trojan Horse to fund a laundry list of far-left programs. It’s a freakin’ feeding frenzy!
Explore posts in the same categories: Abortion, Abuse of Power, Parenting, politics, videoTags: Abortion, Family, politics
You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.
26 January, 2009 at 11:21 am
I’m assuming that white male construction workers wont qualify under her plan, thank goodness.
26 January, 2009 at 11:46 am
This woman is a bigger nut than even Rosie O’Donnell and Michael Moore’s bastard hell-spawn.
Since planned parenthood’s main mission seems to be the slaughter of black kids, I can only guess she means that black people are a drag on the economy and the less they breed the better. Of course I’m not going to say that, in case some illiterate moron implies that I share her evil “philosophy”.
26 January, 2009 at 11:50 am
Oh and up in Pelosi’s neck of the woods if you are an invader that guns down American fathers and sons you will always get your day in court to mock what’s left of the grieving family. With a rep and citizenry like that who needs contraception?
26 January, 2009 at 12:53 pm
Children are a negative consequence in the down-turn of our economy?
26 January, 2009 at 3:16 pm
This is what is meant by “The banality of evil.”
26 January, 2009 at 3:38 pm
Banality – Yes. Stalin’s first official non-thug job was as the USSR’s minister of minorities [or "Multi-Cultural Czar" as Americans would say]. He toured Yiddish and Bukovinian theatres, doling out rubles, winning hearts and minds.
26 January, 2009 at 4:33 pm
Reducing the population is part of the Gore-Strong philosophy.
She’s echoing that line. I am beginning to wonder if these lefties talk in code. certain words keep coming up over and over again,,like “progressive”, “global warming”, global crisis”, and “New World Order” as mentioned yesterday by Gordon Brown.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24968236-12377,00.html
26 January, 2009 at 4:57 pm
I can’t help but notice the similarities in China’s birth control policies and the dragon lady’s policies. Oh sure the guvment hasn’t yet mandated any of it but give em time. As soon as Americans turn over their bodies to these people through nationalized healthcare it will be much easier to enforce. Having a baby? That’s what you thought.
Can anyone think of a group of politicians of the past that talked about how incredibly smart they are? What we have here is people who have been fully indoctrinated in the, it doesn’t matter how smart you really are it’s really how smart you feel you are. We are being led by people who were chosen by those who thought Sarah Palin was Obama’s VP for cryin out loud! I’m starting to think my Feb 20 40 to 50 % approval rating is high.
Eugenics watch. As usual Algor has no original ideas.
26 January, 2009 at 5:20 pm
We can take back congress in 2010
26 January, 2009 at 6:17 pm
News flash for Nancy… Children are future tax payers… no children, no future tax payers, also no future workers, no future government. The cost of children is truely the cost of continuing a society.
26 January, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Senor,
Right, but these morons can’t see that. WHy is Social Security failing, again? Would that be the ratio of payers to payees? Imagine if the 50 million babies murdered since Roe v. Wade were in the work force today….instead, we have to import illegals. Clever way to balkanize the country so they can get more power and eventual dictatorship.
Yep, it isn’t going to take long for his approval ratings to be in the toilet as more people realize that the so-called “right-wing attack machien” was telling the truth about him and his plans. Unfortunately, he’ll do a lot of damage by 2010.
As for SanFranNan (PBFH), the woman takes bizarre to a whole new level. Too bad we don’t have the option to refuse to pay our taxes if they are used to fund murder. Though I think Akira has a point….
26 January, 2009 at 9:47 pm
So what she is saying is that every time the economy slumps a little we got to cull the herd a little right?
Sick bastards their people not a rodent infestation.
26 January, 2009 at 9:55 pm
Since she doesn’t have the nerve to say straight out what she means, people are forced to speculate.
Perhaps she also means that since local communities or the states have to provide more and more social services, then more children means more expenses but less taxes coming in since the parents work less and also right off their children as liabilities in their tax returns.
She can’t say that straight out because then some people would say that means the government should cut back on social services. They [Dems etc] can’t allow that, not only for ideological reasons, but also because the social service sector workers vote overwhelmingly Democrat.
26 January, 2009 at 9:56 pm
sorry: “…WRITE off their children as liabilities”
27 January, 2009 at 2:03 am
I like Rush’s idea to reduce birth rates: hang a picture of Nancy Pelosi in every cheap motel room across the country.