Ignoring What U.S. Has Done For Muslims
I strolled across this little editorial and decided to share it along with a few comments of my own.
Charles Krauthammer, 31 January, 2009 Courant.com
Every new president flatters himself that he, kinder and gentler, is beginning the world anew. Yet, when Barack Obama reached out to Muslims in his inaugural address with “to the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect,” his formulation was needlessly defensive and apologetic.
Is it “new” to acknowledge Muslim interests and show respect to the Muslim world? Obama doesn’t just think so, he said so again to millions in his al-Arabiya interview, insisting on the need to “restore” the “same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago.”
Astonishing. In these most recent 20 years — the alleged winter of our disrespect of the Islamic world — America did not just respect Muslims, it bled for them. It engaged in five military campaigns, every one of which involved — and resulted in — the liberation of a Muslim people: Bosnia, Kosovo, Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq.
-When I went to Bosnia I believed the lie that people were being oppressed and we were going to help them. Now I think I blog to make up for that mistaken idea. Bosnia would have been much better off if the USA had stayed out if it.
The two Balkan interventions — as well as the failed 1992-93 Somali intervention to feed starving African Muslims (43 Americans were killed) — were humanitarian exercises of the highest order, there being no significant U.S. strategic interest at stake. In these 20 years, this nation has done more for suffering and oppressed Muslims than any nation, Muslim or non-Muslim, anywhere on earth. Why are we apologizing?
-Why indeed?
And what of that happy U.S.-Muslim relationship that Obama imagines existed “as recently as 20 or 30 years ago” that he has now come to restore? Thirty years ago, 1979, saw the greatest U.S.-Muslim rupture in our 233-year history: Iran’s radical Islamic revolution, the seizure of the U.S. embassy, the 14 months of America held hostage.
-The minions in iran have plenty of celebrations planned to celebrate 30 years of death and carnage.
Which came just a few years after the Arab oil embargo that sent the United States into a long and punishing recession. Which, in turn, was preceded by the kidnapping and cold-blooded execution by Arab terrorists of the U.S. ambassador in Sudan and his charge d’affaires.
This is to say nothing of the Marine barracks massacre of 1983, and the innumerable attacks on U.S. embassies and installations around the world during what Obama now characterizes as the halcyon days of U.S.-Islamic relations.
Look. If Barack Obama wants to say, as he said to al-Arabiya, I have Muslim roots, Muslim family members, have lived in a Muslim country — implying a special affinity that uniquely positions him to establish good relations — that’s fine. But it is both false and deeply injurious to this country to draw a historical line dividing America under Obama from a benighted past when Islam was supposedly disrespected and demonized.
-I would think having muslim roots would bring him deep shame.
As in Obama’s grand admonition: “We cannot paint with a broad brush a faith as a consequence of the violence that is done in that faith’s name.” Have “we” been doing that, smearing Islam because of a small minority? George Bush went to the Islamic Center in Washington six days after 9/11, when the fires of Ground Zero were still smoldering, to declare “Islam is peace,” to extend fellowship and friendship to Muslims, to insist that Americans treat them with respect and generosity of spirit.
And America listened. In these seven years since 9/11 — seven years during which thousands of Muslims rioted all over the world (resulting in the death of more than 100) to avenge a bunch of cartoons — there’s not been a single anti-Muslim riot in the United States to avenge the greatest massacre in U.S. history. On the contrary. In its aftermath, we elected our first Muslim member of Congress and our first president of Muslim parentage.
-We as a nation have been fooled by islam for many years, there is a price for ignorance and some day we will pay it.
Every president has the right to portray himself as ushering in a new era of this or that. Obama wants to pursue new ties with Muslim nations, drawing on his own identity and associations. Good.
But when his self-inflation as redeemer of U.S.-Muslim relations leads him to suggest that pre-Obama America was disrespectful or insensitive or uncaring of Muslims, he is engaging not just in fiction but in gratuitous disparagement of the country he is now privileged to lead.
-We should approach the Islamic world from a position of strength. If American politicians really wanted to help this world; US aid and business should demand receiving nations respect 21st century values. Any nation that refuses, especially the ones holding onto seventh century barbaric practices should be cut off completely.
31 January, 2009 at 9:22 am
1.
Kauthammer, what a tool. He’s more annoyed with Obama for denigrating all the services the US has made to promote Jihad. But Obama has his own method of Jihad. To hear these two argue would be like listening to Mao vs Ho.
Re: “In these most recent 20 years — the alleged winter of our disrespect of the Islamic world — America did not just respect Muslims, it bled for them. It engaged in five military campaigns, every one of which involved — and resulted in — the liberation of a Muslim people: Bosnia, Kosovo, Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq. The two Balkan interventions — as well as the failed 1992-93 Somali intervention to feed starving African Muslims — were humanitarian exercises of the highest order, there being no significant U.S. strategic interest at stake. In these 20 years, this nation has done more for suffering and oppressed Muslims than any nation, Muslim or non-Muslim, anywhere on earth.”
TRANSLATION: The USA is a slave of Allah. We are morons. We piss on our national interest. We’ll do anything to grovel towards Mecca in the hope of a pat on the head. US soldiers are there to be sacrificed for Islam.
2.
U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, November 5, 2002:
“In the 1990’s, five different times the U.S. military went to the aid of Muslim people. First to the people of Kuwait, who had been conquered by a vicious dictator and were being horribly abused. Then to the aid of the predominantly Kurdish population in northern Iraq, who are overwhelmingly Muslim. Then to the aid of the Bosnians in former Yugoslavia, who were Muslim. Then to the aid of the Kosovo Albanians in Serbia, who are overwhelmingly Muslim, I think entirely Muslim. And also to the aid of the starving people of Somalia, who are all Muslim.”
TRANSLATION: “Let every nation know, we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, in order to assure the survival and the success of Islam.”
3.
Trifkovic on “Washingtonian madness” New Years Day, 2009″
QUOTE
…
there may be differences over tactics and means, but the alleged necessity of America’s continued, open-ended “engagement” in faraway lands is never questioned–and it will not be questioned under the new regime.
The madness is an amorphous beast … It has many names—multiculturalism, one-worldism, tolerantism, inclusivism, antidiscriminationism—that demand engagement abroad and wide-open doors at home. Both abroad and at home, the impulse is neurotic; its justification, gnostic. It reflects the collective loss of nerve, faith, and identity of a diseased society, producing a self-destructive malaise that is literally unprecedented in history.
The intoxication is the arrogant belief that our reason and our science and our technology can resolve all the dilemmas and challenges of our existence, and, in particular, that enlightened abstractions—democracy, human rights, free markets—can be spread across the world and are capable of transforming it in a way that would ultimately turn Muhammads into Joes (which is what they all want, we are assured, or would choose only if they could think clearly). Both the madness and the intoxication have a “left,” essentially Wilsonian, narrative (one-world, postnational, compassionate, multilateralist, therapeutic) and a “right,” or neoconservative, one (democracy-exporting, interventionist, monopolar, boastfully self-aggrandizing).
…
The two sects’ deep-seated distaste for the traditional societies, regimes, and religion of the European continent was manifested in President Clinton’s war against the Serbs in 1999 and in their unanimous support for Kosovo’s independence today.
For the same reason, they share a visceral Russophobia, a soft spot for Chechen jihadists, and a commitment to NATO expansion. Both Wilsonians and neoconservatives are united in opposing democracy in postcommunist Eastern Europe [State Dept + Soros = the "colored" revolutions], lest it produce governments that will base the recovery of their ravaged societies on the revival of the family, sovereign nationhood, and the Christian Faith. Inevitably, they have joined forces in creating and funding political parties and NGOs east of the Trieste-Stettin Line that promote the entire spectrum of postmodern isms that have atomized America and the rest of the West for the past four decades. From Bratislava to Bucharest to Belgrade, both present the embrace of deviancy, perversion, and morbidity as the litmus test of an aspirant’s “Western” clubbability.
…
We cannot know what will be the theme of after-dinner discussions a hundred years hence, but we do know it will not be the global grandeur of the liberal-democratic-capitalist Pax Americana.
UNQUOTE
http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/trifkovic-washingtonian-madness/
+ + +
31 January, 2009 at 9:30 am
Re Dr B/浪人:
“When I went to Bosnia I believed the lie that people were being oppressed and we were going to help them. ”
I guess you mean you went there with the military.
What’s your reaction to the Bosnian pics and videos here:
http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/new-world-order-bosnia-kosovo-georgia/
Did you see that at the time? Exaggerated? Even worse than the pics/vids would indicate?
1995.08.30 – 1995.09.20: NATO “Operation Deliberate Force” vs The Serb Republic (Bosnia)
A sustained air campaign, involving 400 aircraft and 5000 personnel from 15 nations, flying 3515 sorties, using 68% precision armaments against 338 individual targets [The Serb population less than 1,500,000; or 37% of Bosnia], with the object of undermining the military capability of the Bosnian Serb Army in order to strengthen and protect al-Qaeda and NATO’s other Jihadi allies.
31 January, 2009 at 4:31 pm
Akira,
I was on the wrong side when we helped the mujahedeen against the soviets, helped feed somalis and again in Bosnia. I had a very small part in some major mistakes. If you check back to my older posts I have repeatedly apologized to the soviets and the Serbs. Much like the youth serving today I didn’t understand what impact saving so many minions would have on the world. Without the USA there would be no jihad. Our polices have allowed islam the strength to strike us and has given them a false sense of security. Although the older politicians still believe the Islamic world can be reasoned with, the younger generation does not. The tide will quickly turn when the old guard gets replaced by the new generation.
31 January, 2009 at 8:50 pm
Let’s just go back further and get bunches more General Jack Pershings…