Destroy a corporation for Palestine

This is a cute idea but short sighted. Muslims cannot get along inside of muslim countries organizing them on a global basis into an economic powerhouse is a pipe dream.

By Hamid Golpira, 8 February 2009, Tehran Times
It’s time for some economic jihad. Let’s destroy a corporation for Palestine.
-I suggest you start with the banks that helped damage the US economy.

Muslims must adopt a comprehensive economic strategy in this era of globalization.

If we don’t, then we will be worthy of contempt because we will have become our own worst enemies.
-Muslims have always been the biggest threat to muslims, declare jihad on your nearest mosque.

One and a half billion Muslims acting in unison can have a great influence on the global economy.
-Imagine what you could do if you actually had working economies. The failure of Islamic leadership to build working infrastructures has doomed a billon muslims to a life of poverty.

Indeed, the Islamic ummah is already a key component of the world economy since a market of 1.5 billion people cannot be ignored. But unfortunately, most Muslims have not realized this fact and the profits from our purchases are still being used against us.

When will we wake up?
-When you stop living in the seventh century.

However, it’s not easy to be a jihadi. The struggle must be fought on the physical, mental, and spiritual planes. True jihad must be fought on all fronts. It must be waged on the cultural, military, intellectual, ideological, psychological, spiritual, and economic fronts.

But in this era of globalization, it is essential that Muslims learn how to correctly conduct economic jihad.

First of all, we must not give money to the enemy.
-That would be the people that control you, the clerics and your political leadership.

Even now, the enemies of Islam are laughing at us, saying, “Look at the foolish Muslims. We have brainwashed them so completely that they are giving us their money. They are buying products manufactured by our corporations and are oblivious to the fact that we are using the revenues to pay for weapons that are killing their own people and to fund programs meant to undermine their own culture and way of life. They are financing the destruction of their own civilization.”
-Actually we are saying “look at those backward savages”

Shame on us. This is true for a large segment of the Muslim ummah.

Thus, clearly, it is time to reform ourselves.
-Duh!

And then we can truly begin the economic jihad.

There are about 1.5 billion Muslims in the world. Although we should welcome any help from non-Muslims who believe in justice, our community, the Islamic ummah, is so large that we can do it on our own.
-Sure you can; just like you can build working societies.

There is currently a campaign calling for a boycott of Israeli products. This is a good idea, but we should expand the campaign and make it a boycott of all corporations that are financing the war on Islam.
-Boycott the blogs and email; it takes time to delete all the spam and death threats. I would have more time to post if you would just stop the nonsense.

Although it is important to target all enemy corporations, in order to achieve a quick initial victory, which would boost morale, we should especially target one giant multinational corporation.

We should first ask the executives of that corporation to stop financing the war on Islam. If they agree, we should take it off the boycott list. If they refuse, we should call for a worldwide boycott of the targeted corporation’s products with the goal of bankrupting the corporation.

The global economic crisis will help us. Many major corporations have gone bankrupt during the global economic meltdown of the past year.
-Hey genius your governments are also suffering. The US economy hickups and look what happened to the rest of the world. Your worst nightmare would be a world without the US.

This economic jihad is a novel way to turn the crisis into an opportunity.

A corporation from the U.S. military-industrial complex would be a very good target to begin with.
-Banks, start with the banks.

As a matter of fact, many Islamic countries are buying arms and military equipment from the very same corporations that manufactured the weapons, jets, and tanks that are being used by the Israelis to kill Muslims in Gaza.

Can’t we produce our own arms and military equipment in the Islamic world?
-First you would have to teach muslims a work ethic, strip away their sense of entitlement and teach them some skills. With effort you might get a working factory in a dozen or so years but you would still have to hire westerners to design, build and operate it.

Or, if not, can we at least make our arms purchases from corporations that are not supplying the weapons that are killing Muslims?
-Name one.

If we do not take action now, we will be making a serious strategic error and committing a grave sin. And we will have to hang our heads in shame for failing to act while certain Muslim countries are financing the destruction of Islamic civilization.
-Poor babies, if Islamic civilization could stand on its own merit there would be no threat.

The beauty of economic jihad is that it is completely legal. Even Muslims who would not participate in other forms of jihad out of fear of persecution and arrest could join this struggle.
-Screw it join a real jihad, race on over to Afghanistan and we will take it from there. Do not be a half jihadist, grab your sandals and join the Taliban, allah ackinberries.

Of course, the enemies of Islam will say that economic jihad is economic terrorism, but when that happens we must act swiftly on the ideological front to prove that such actions are totally legal. After all, people have been organizing economic boycotts for many years.

So, Muslim brothers and sisters, let us take up the struggle of economic jihad now. Destroy a corporation for Palestine.
-Bank, damn you, start with the banks.

Explore posts in the same categories: Analysis, Economics, Jihad, muslim Intolerance, Muslim whining

6 Comments on “Destroy a corporation for Palestine”

  1. leo Says:

    Interestingly enough I agree with the guy.
    Let’s build a fence separating Muslims and non-Muslims.
    Then after 100 years or so we will take this fence down and repopulate Muslim areas.

    Somebody: “You can kill infidel for being an infidel. You can kill Muslim for being bad Muslim.”

  2. tgusa Says:

    These people, muslims and leftards crack me up. This boycott thing is a conservative weapon. Most of the stuff we produce are haram to muslims so there would be little business drop off if any. Same with a leftard boycott they are cheap, from evading taxes all the way down to stiffing their friendly and helpful waitress it’s a well documented fact. We 47%ers are the real threat as far as boycotts go, we are united in our cause, we agree on just about every issue, not so for the leftards and muslims who right now are working together.
    Our strength is built on our commonalities their strength is built on an illusion of unity but if you examine their different groups and the contradictions that they have between them it’s easy to see that they don’t have near the power that we the minority 47 % do. It’s the old saying, anything they can do we can do better.

  3. Appalled By The World Says:

    These people will fail if they try to build companies to compete with the West. They build nothing-all they do is take money given to them and channel it into the only thing they’re good for-destroying things. People who know nothing but destroying will never be builders.

  4. Akira Says:

    9 out of 10 Israel-hating Jews agree!

    QUOTE

    Enough. It’s time for a boycott

    The best way to end the bloody occupation is to target Israel with the kind of movement that ended apartheid in South Africa

    Naomi Klein

    [Canadian; Communist Russian Jewish grandparents; Vietnam draft-dodger father.]

    The Guardian, Saturday 10 January 2009

    It’s time. Long past time. The best strategy to end the increasingly bloody occupation is for Israel to become the target of the kind of global movement that put an end to apartheid in South Africa. In July 2005 a huge coalition of Palestinian groups laid out plans to do just that. They called on “people of conscience all over the world to impose broad boycotts and implement divestment initiatives against Israel similar to those applied to South Africa in the apartheid era”. The campaign Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions was born.

    Every day that Israel pounds Gaza brings more converts to the BDS cause – even among Israeli Jews. In the midst of the assault roughly 500 Israelis, dozens of them well-known artists and scholars, sent a letter to foreign ambassadors in Israel. It calls for “the adoption of immediate restrictive measures and sanctions” and draws a clear parallel with the anti-apartheid struggle. “The boycott on South Africa was effective, but Israel is handled with kid gloves … This international backing must stop.”

    Yet even in the face of these clear calls, many of us still can’t go there. The reasons are complex, emotional and understandable. But they simply aren’t good enough. Economic sanctions are the most effective tool in the non-violent arsenal: surrendering them verges on active complicity. Here are the top four objections to the BDS strategy, followed by counter-arguments.

    “Punitive measures will alienate rather than persuade Israelis.”

    The world has tried what used to be called “constructive engagement”. It has failed utterly. Since 2006 Israel has been steadily escalating its criminality: expanding settlements, launching an outrageous war against Lebanon, and imposing collective punishment on Gaza through the brutal blockade. Despite this escalation, Israel has not faced punitive measures – quite the opposite. The weapons and $3bn in annual aid the US sends Israel are only the beginning. Throughout this key period, Israel has enjoyed a dramatic improvement in its diplomatic, cultural and trade relations with a variety of other allies. For instance, in 2007 Israel became the first country outside Latin America to sign a free-trade deal with the Mercosur bloc. In the first nine months of 2008, Israeli exports to Canada went up 45%. A new deal with the EU is set to double Israel’s exports of processed food. And in December European ministers “upgraded” the EU-Israel association agreement, a reward long sought by Jerusalem.

    It is in this context that Israeli leaders started their latest war: confident they would face no meaningful costs. It is remarkable that over seven days of wartime trading, the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange’s flagship index actually went up 10.7%. When carrots don’t work, sticks are needed.

    “Israel is not South Africa.”

    Of course it isn’t. The relevance of the South African model is that it proves BDS tactics can be effective when weaker measures (protests, petitions, backroom lobbying) fail. And there are deeply distressing echoes of apartheid in the occupied territories: the colour-coded IDs and travel permits, the bulldozed homes and forced displacement, the settler-only roads. Ronnie Kasrils, a prominent South African politician, said the architecture of segregation he saw in the West Bank and Gaza was “infinitely worse than apartheid”. That was in 2007, before Israel began its full-scale war against the open-air prison that is Gaza.

    “Why single out Israel when the US, Britain and other western countries do the same things in Iraq and Afghanistan?”

    Boycott is not a dogma; it is a tactic. The reason the strategy should be tried is practical: in a country so small and trade-dependent, it could actually work.

    “Boycotts sever communication; we need more dialogue, not less.”

    This one I’ll answer with a personal story. For eight years, my books have been published in Israel by a commercial house called Babel. But when I published The Shock Doctrine, I wanted to respect the boycott. On the advice of BDS activists, including the wonderful writer John Berger, I contacted a small publisher called Andalus. Andalus is an activist press, deeply involved in the anti-occupation movement and the only Israeli publisher devoted exclusively to translating Arabic writing into Hebrew. We drafted a contract that guarantees that all proceeds go to Andalus’s work, and none to me. I am boycotting the Israeli economy but not Israelis.

    Our modest publishing plan required dozens of phone calls, emails and instant messages, stretching between Tel Aviv, Ramallah, Paris, Toronto and Gaza City. My point is this: as soon as you start a boycott strategy, dialogue grows dramatically. The argument that boycotts will cut us off from one another is particularly specious given the array of cheap information technologies at our fingertips. We are drowning in ways to rant at each other across national boundaries. No boycott can stop us.

    Just about now, many a proud Zionist is gearing up for major point-scoring: don’t I know that many of these very hi-tech toys come from Israeli research parks, world leaders in infotech? True enough, but not all of them. Several days into Israel’s Gaza assault, Richard Ramsey, managing director of a British telecom specialising in voice-over-internet services, sent an email to the Israeli tech firm MobileMax: “As a result of the Israeli government action in the last few days we will no longer be in a position to consider doing business with yourself or any other Israeli company.”

    Ramsey says his decision wasn’t political; he just didn’t want to lose customers. “We can’t afford to lose any of our clients,” he explains, “so it was purely commercially defensive.”

    It was this kind of cold business calculation that led many companies to pull out of South Africa two decades ago. And it’s precisely the kind of calculation that is our most realistic hope of bringing justice, so long denied, to Palestine.

    UNQOUTE

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/10/naomi-klein-boycott-israel

  5. Akira Says:

    This Boycott-Bomb plan will work if they can get Jews to plan and organize and implement it.

  6. irishoaks Says:

    To Abram, God gave this promise of Israel:
    Genesis 12:3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
    Genesis 15: 18-21 In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: The Henites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.
    Gensis 17: 7,8 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and to thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee. And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.
    Now, that is very definitive. It leaves nothing to question. The ownership of that land is set from the Lord God Almighty. It is His and only His to give. He also made His promise to the Jews; that they would be His people. Again, there is no argument with the Word of God.
    The Bible and prophecy is being fulfilled before our very eyes in our everyday life with the attacks of Israel and the socialism of our country and the other “labor pains” that we read about. If you are not aware of the saving grace that is gifted through God’s only Son, Jesus, then I beg you to learn of Him. Every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus is Lord.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 123 other followers