Obama the Dhimmitard
Just more stuff that makes me say, “Grrrrrrrrr!!!!“
Obama courts West-haters
Plans to attend conference seeking Islamic interests
Posted: March 31, 2009
By Aaron Klein
WorldNetDaily
JERUSALEM– Concern has been mounting over President Obama’s scheduled participation in the U.N.’s Alliance of Civilizations summit in Turkey next month, with some critics painting the organization as anti-Western and advocating Iranian interests.
“The Alliance might more appropriately be called a U.N.-approved Slush Fund for Advancing Iranian and Other Islamic Interests,” wrote Claudia Rosett, a Forbes contributor and journalist-in-residence with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
A separate report by the Heritage Foundation labeled the Alliance forum “well-intentioned” but with little prospect for success due to “bias and objectionable proposals to freedom of expression.” The report was titled “Why President Obama should not attend the Alliance of Civilizations forum.”
Obama is reportedly due at the Alliance April 7. The organization was formed in 2005 as an offshoot of the Dialogue of Civilizations, an earlier U.N. project founded by former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami, who is still a member of the Alliance.
Other Alliance member states or participating organizations include China; the Organization of the Islamic Conference; the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; the Arab League; Turkey; and the Arab League Educational, Cultural and Scientific Organization. Not on the list is Israel.
In 2006, the Alliance released a 63-page official report largely laying blame on the West for negative perceptions of Muslims and Islam. The report only mentioned Islamic terrorism once – in its recommendations section where it suggested the Western media should not use the term terrorism.
The Western media should refrain from using certain terms in reporting on Muslims and Islam, the report recommended, “including the use of terms such as ‘Islamic terrorism’ and ‘Islamic fascism’ – [which] have contributed to an alarming increase in Islamophobia which further exacerbates Muslim fears of the West.”
Jorge Sampaio, U.N. High Representative for the Alliance, declared at a press conference in Iran last year that freedom of speech should be balanced with respect for religion.
“There is a balance to be found between freedom of expression and respect for religion and for religious feelings and principles,” he said.
According to Iranian state-run television, Sampaio also told Supreme Islamic Revolution Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei that Iran “has an important role to play within the Alliance of Civilizations because of its unique cultural and religious makeup.”
Iran’s Khatami, meanwhile, has reportedly been actively involved with shaping the Alliance agenda. Also, as Rosett pointed out, Khatami entered the U.S. in 2006 for an Alliance meeting and used his U.N.-sponsored trip to stay in the country for another two weeks, During that time he embarked on a speaking tour that saw him denounce America and keynote a Washington fundraising dinner for the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR.
Wrote Rosett: “From U.S. soil, thanks to an Alliance entry ticket, Khatami served broadly as a prominent spokesman for Iran’s interests – just as Iran was thumbing its nose at U.S. efforts, via the U.N. Security Council, to put a stop to Tehran’s pursuit of nuclear bomb fuel.”
Alliance hails ‘anti-Israel’ Arab plan
The Alliance’s 2006 report, reviewed by WND, seemed to focus disproportionately on Israel. It painted a picture that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is largely to blame for much of the violence in the Middle East.
The report recognizes the importance of a so-called “Arab Peace Initiative,” which defenders of Israel warn would leave the Jewish state with truncated, difficult-to-defend borders and could threaten Israel’s Jewish character by compelling it to accept millions of foreign Arabs.
Following scores of denials he would trumpet the plan, Obama in January hailed the Arab initiative, which offers normalization of ties with the Jewish state in exchange for extreme Israeli concessions. In an interview with an Arab television network – his first formal interview as president – Obama stated:
“Well, here’s what I think is important. Look at the proposal that was put forth by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. … I might not agree with every aspect of the proposal, but it took great courage to put forward something that is as significant as that. I think that there are ideas across the region of how we might pursue peace. I do think that it is impossible for us to think only in terms of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and not think in terms of what’s happening with Syria or Iran or Lebanon or Afghanistan and Pakistan.”
The Arab Initiative, originally proposed by King Abdullah in 2002 and later adopted by the Arab League, states that Israel would receive “normal relations” with the Arab world in exchange for a full withdrawal from the entire Gaza Strip, West Bank, Golan Heights and eastern Jerusalem, which includes the Temple Mount.
The West Bank contains important Jewish biblical sites and borders central Israeli population centers, while the Golan Heights looks down on Israeli civilian zones and was twice used by Syria to mount ground invasions into the Jewish state.
The Arab plan also demands the imposition of a non-binding U.N. resolution that calls for so-called Palestinian refugees who wish to move inside Israel to be permitted to do so at the “earliest practicable date.”
Palestinians have long demanded the “right of return” for millions of “refugees,” a formula Israeli officials across the political spectrum warn is code for Israel’s destruction by flooding the Jewish state with millions of Arabs, thereby changing its demographics.
When Arab countries attacked the Jewish state after its creation in 1948, some 725,000 Arabs living within Israel’s borders fled or were expelled from the area that became Israel. Also at that time, about 820,000 Jews were expelled from Arab countries or fled following rampant persecution.
While most Jewish refugees were absorbed by Israel and other countries, the majority of Palestinian Arabs have been maintained in 59 U.N.-run camps that do not seek to settle the Arabs elsewhere. There are currently about 4 million Arabs who claim Palestinian refugee status with the U.N., including children and grandchildren of the original fleeing Arabs, Arabs living full-time in Jordan, and Arabs who long ago emigrated throughout the Middle East and to the West.
Explore posts in the same categories: dhimmitude
31 March, 2009 at 1:17 pm
This is where I stand, if these people want to reach out to the muslims that’s their problem now and later. I don’t want to hear one word about any of these people when they end up hostages or on video being butchered. If the Pres or his associates want to ply this game the result is all on them. Eventually when hundreds of thousands of Americans are murdered there will be hell to pay. I wouldn’t want to be one of these people then, they will wish that they had been hostages or stars in their own videos of death.
Remember gulf war one? Well here is the thanks we get for that. American Digest Lets kill 300 thousand, yea! Notice the approving laughter at all the right times? Want to make friends, go for it, suckas.
31 March, 2009 at 5:53 pm
What the Hell is The Heritage Foundation complaining about, For years now they’ve been promoting Islam a great force for civilization. They’ve been demanding that US taxpayers proselytize for Islam and propagate the Koran more widely.
Now they’re upset that people agree with them?
Typical “Heritage” BS:
“No one can say that Muslims can’t be political pluralists. Islam isn’t monolithic. Islam can be secular, tolerant and democratic.”
“At the root of the current wave of violence against the United States and its allies is a blasphemous interpretation of religion, which sanctions the killing of Americans—and citizens of all nations and religions, even moderate and Orthodox Muslims who do not agree with the radicalization of their religion.”
“Neutralizing the militant ideology fueling terrorism is a key factor if the world— and moderate Islam—are to succeed”
“The key to overcoming the rhetoric and practice of terrorism justified as religion is to empower moderate Muslims and secularists who consider Islam a personal religion, and Islamists who strive for the creation of a Caliphate and world domination. ”
“The United States should reach out to the countries of Europe and beyond, including moderate segments in the greater Middle East (e.g., Turkey and Morocco) to cooperate in formulating and disseminating the ideas of moderate Islam.”
“U.S.-funded programs should prioritize moderate Sufi and Ismaili Islam in their assistance programs; moderate schools of both Sunni and Shia; the Bahai faith; and universal and tolerant forms of Christianity, both indigenous to the region and those willing to expand there. The United States should support secularization of curricula in the Muslim world, the introduction of programs that teach tolerance and diversity, and the introduction of American studies and Holocaust studies into middle school, high school, and college curricula. America and its allies should actively promote the universal values of tolerance, human rights, gender and religious equality, and ideas of economic and personal freedom, secularism, and faiths indigenous to these troubled regions.”
http://www.heritage.org/Research/HomelandDefense/the-long-war-ch7.cfm
31 March, 2009 at 8:25 pm
Who wants the “moderate” islam to succeed? There is no such critter.
Is indeed Obama a Dhimmi? Frankly that is a question that remains to be seen. From his quote in his own words from one of his books of how quickly he would embrace islam, to his being islam in Indonesia as Barry Soeoto—I do not think he is a Dhimmi.
What we need are many General Jack Pershings. They would set things aright with the muzzies and tell the milktoast donothings to get out of the way.
1 April, 2009 at 4:33 am
irishoaks Says:
“…I do not think he is a Dhimmi.”
Who really knows what he is?
He has been called out on going back on almost everything he has said.
There’s not much ‘hope’. But there’s certainly a lot of ‘change’. And it isn’t good change.