Obama’s Original Birth Certificate DOES Exist!!!
This is for all you brain-dead idiots who came to our website from Salon.com and tried to tell us that Obama’s original birth certificate was destroyed about eight years ago – thus toeing the Communist News Network’s outright lie to Lou Dobbs in an effort to shut him up about Obama’s birth certificate.
Don’t you idiots ever think for yourselves? Don’t you idiots ever wonder why the government and Obama are hiding information contained on his original birth certificate via constant lying, changing of laws and procedures, and wasting millions in court fighting to keep from having to shell out about 15 lousy bucks to produce a certified copy of his original?
Get a clue! There’s something on Obama’s birth certificate that he is trying to hide. We just want to know what it is…
Hawaii officials confirm Obama’s original birth certificate still exists
By Dan Nakaso – Honolulu Advertiser
Advertiser Staff Writers
Hawai’i's Health Department confirmed yesterday that it has President Obama’s original Aug. 4, 1961, birth certificate in storage, but the announcement is unlikely to satisfy conspiracy theorists who insist Obama was born in Kenya.
“We don’t destroy vital records,” Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo said. “That’s our whole job, to maintain and retain vital records.”
The Health Department’s director reiterated yesterday that she has seen Obama’s birth records.
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai’i and is a natural-born American citizen,” Fukino said in a statement. “I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008, over eight months ago.”
Fukino tried on Oct. 31 to put an end to the belief among so-called “birthers” that Obama was not born in Honolulu’s Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital. The birthers insist that Obama was not born in the U.S. and is therefore ineligible to be president.
Despite Fukino’s statement yesterday — and several court rulings and statements by Hawai’i's Republican governor, Linda Lingle, the issue continued to resonate from Capitol Hill to the blogosphere.
A congressional resolution introduced yesterday by Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawai’i, commemorating the 50th anniversary of Island statehood was temporarily postponed because birthers objected to a clause noting Obama was born in Hawai’i, said Dave Helfert, an Abercrombie spokesman.
The line “Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961;” appeared to be construed by birthers as a thinly veiled attempt to get Congress to affirm Obama’s U.S. citizenship, Helfert said.
As the issue came to a vote yesterday, Minnesota Republican Congresswoman Michele Bachmann rose to object, saying there was not a quorum present.
The House later voted unanimously 378-0 to approve the resolution. Bachmann voted in favor of the resolution.
Mainland media has also continued to focus attention on the birthers. CNN’s Lou Dobbs last week demanded Obama’s original birth certificate. That was followed by CNN/U.S. President Jon Klein telling staffers of “Lou Dobbs Tonight” that the issue is a “dead” story, according to a Los Angeles Times report.
In an e-mail, according to the Times, Klein wrote that CNN researchers had determined that Obama’s 1961 birth certificate no longer exists because Hawai’i officials had discarded paper documents in 2001 — a claim denied yesterday by Isle health officials.
In 2001, Hawai’i's paper documents were reproduced in electronic format but “any paper data prior to that still exists,” Health Department spokeswoman Okubo said.
Okubo would not say where Obama’s original birth certificate is, but said “we have backups for all of our backups.”
“Our Certificate of Live Birth is the standard form, which was modeled after national standards that are acceptable by federal agencies and organizations,” Okubo said. “With that form, you can get your passport or your soccer registration or your driver’s license.”
One thing that remains unclear is whether Obama has a copy of the original 1961 Certificate of Live Birth, or if he would even be allowed to see it if he asked.
Hawai’i's disclosure law (Hawai’i Revised Statutes 338-18) states that “it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part on any such record … “
The law further states that the Health Department “shall not permit inspection of public health statistics records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record.”
Those who have “direct and tangible interest” are generally limited to the person named in the record, the spouse, parent, descendant, or personal representative, or by someone who is involved in marital, parental or death litigation involving the named person’s vital record or other legal reason established by a court order, and various official agency or organization representatives, including the state director of health, according to the law.
format changed
The standard “Certification of Live Birth” that Hawai’i health officials now issue — and was posted on Obama’s campaign Web site — has less information than was required on the “Certificate of Live Birth” that Eleanor Nordyke was issued for each of her twin daughters on Aug. 5, 1961.
Nordyke was in labor at Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital the same time as Obama’s late mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Nordyke said. She gave birth to twins the day after Obama was born, Nordyke said, and her daughters later attended Punahou School with Obama.
The modern-day birth certificates issued to anyone seeking their Hawai’i birth records have spaces for the names and races of the parents, as well as information such as the time of birth.
Nordyke’s 1961 birth certificates required much more information, such as the ages, occupations and birthplaces of the babies’ parents.
There was a box to determine whether the mother’s address was “on a Farm or Plantation,” and the signature — but not the name — of the “attendant” was required, as well as boxes to determine whether the attendant was an “M.D.,” “D.O.,” “midwife” or “other.”
Birthers have failed to get state and federal courts in Hawai’i, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, California, Georgia and Mississippi to force Hawai’i officials to produce a copy of Obama’s birth certificate, with many of the courts agreeing with Lingle’s administration that birth records are confidential.
In October, the Hawai’i Supreme Court denied a writ of mandamus on behalf of Internet columnist Andy Martin. The court ruled that Martin did not have a “direct tangible interest” in seeking Obama’s birth certificate.
In December, the U.S. Supreme Court — without comment — declined to hear arguments in another case alleging Obama did not meet the Constitution’s citizenship requirements.
first mention
In November 2008, The Advertiser reported that the first published mention of the future president appeared in a Sunday Advertiser birth announcement that ran on Aug. 13, 1961:
“Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug. 4.”
The identical announce- ment ran the following day in the Honolulu Star-Bulletin.
Birthers wave off those birth announcements, saying that Obama family members 48 years ago could have phoned in false information to both newspapers.
Such vital statistics, however, were not sent to the newspapers by the general public but by the Health Department, which received the information directly from hospitals, Okubo said.
Birth announcements from the public ran elsewhere in both papers and usually included information such as the newborn’s name, weight and time of birth.
“Take a second and think about that,” wrote Robert Farley of the St. Petersburg (Fla.) Times’ Pulitzer Prize winning Web site PoliticFact.com on July 1. “In order to phony those notices up, it would have required the complicity of the state Health Department and two independent newspapers — on the off chance this unnamed child might want to one day be president of the United States.”
Last week, Jon Stewart of “The Daily Show” had fun with the topic of Obama’s birth certificate, suggesting that it’s part of a much larger conspiracy.
“Not only is Barack Obama our first black president,” Stewart said. “But he’s our first non-American president.”
Reach Dan Nakaso at dnakaso@honoluluadvertiser.com.
Explore posts in the same categories: politics
28 July, 2009 at 11:27 am
Here’s Obama’s dilemma in a nutshell (READ VERY CAREFULLY AND DIGEST):
If BHO shows his original long form birth certificate, indeed showing he was born in Hawaii, it will also show his father was American citizen, Frank Marshall Davis, not the Kenyan/British citizen, Barack Obama Sr. While that would allow Barack Jr. to be POTUS eligible as BOTH a “citizen”/“native born citizen” AND an Article 2 “natural born citizen” — that is, born to two American citizens on American soil — it would simultaneously show he is a fraud hiding his real father — a unacceptable political debacle.
If, on the other hand, BHO keeps hiding his original long form birth certificate — while simply repeating, without showing, he was born in Hawaii — he can still CLAIM BOTH he was born in Hawaii AND his father was the Kenyan/British Barack Obama Sr. This would enable Barack Jr. to claim he’s a “citizen”/“native born citizen” but it would mean (if a federal court would ever get around to declaring and thus far no one has standing to bring the suit) that he’s NOT an Article 2 “natural born citizen” and thus not eligible to be POTUS — a legal/constitutional debacle since all acts under an illegal POTUS are void.
So it seems, BHO has elected option one until forced to go option two because for now it looks like no federal court will ever find a plaintiff with standing. (Of course, there’s the additional issue of BHO losing American citizen status if/when he became an Indonesian citizen — that is, IF he returned and was naturalized he would be a legal citizen, but would lose both native and natural born status, and, IF he returned and was not naturalized, he would be an illegal immigrant unlawfully in this country — but we’ll leave that for another day.)
28 July, 2009 at 11:52 am
Yup, the rabbit hole goes deep with the One…
28 July, 2009 at 12:51 pm
“the west wing of Obama’s modestly sized skeleton closet?”
One newly created skeleton…
http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2009/07/obamas-top-secret-service-agent-fired.html
Yeah, happens all the time… like, uh, ….anyone ever hear of that before?
Remember, the COB is only the tip of the document coverup iceberg.
http://www.obamaspast.com/popups_facts/guarded_records.html
Perhaps he wants to keep it just about the COB, so when he shows it and it’s valid, we’ll leave him alone about the rest, which probably contain the most damaging information?
28 July, 2009 at 1:17 pm
MORE STUFF…
http://projectworldawareness.com/2009/07/obama-is-shielding/
http://stopsocialism.wordpress.com/tag/what-is-obama-hiding/
http://www.examiner.com/x-5325-Orlando-Republican-Examiner~y2009m7d6-Wheres-the-birth-certificate-An-interview-with-Joseph-Farah
The good news is that it isn’t going away…
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=102156
The bad news is that if we get rid of him, O’Bidet gets it.
28 July, 2009 at 1:19 pm
I don’t know why that one link in the blockquote got cut, but here it is again…
http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/2009/07/14/its_official!_hawaii_never_issued_obamas_2007_certification_of_live_birth.thtml
28 July, 2009 at 1:20 pm
ARRRRGGGGHHHHH….
MAYBE THIS WILL WORK?
28 July, 2009 at 2:11 pm
Just an FYI:
Obama’s birth certificate number is out of sequence…
According to folklore, he was born on August 4th, 1961 (the same day and year as one of my sisters, BTW!), but the following microfiche scan of twins born in Hawaii on August 5th, 1961 reveals that Obama’s sequence number of 151 1961-010641 is a later sequence number than the twins who were born a day AFTER Obama:
http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/files/2009/07/m1139416728.gif
The sequence numbers for the twins are 151 61-10637 and 151 61-10638, or, if you extrapolate the modern sequencing numbers by using Obama’s COLB sequence number, they would translate to sequence numbers 151 1961-010637 and 151 1961-010638.
This may be nothing but a sequencing problem caused by the order in which the state received birth verifications from the parents.
But, I just thought I’d throw that info out there for ya’.
Cheers
28 July, 2009 at 4:14 pm
“…may be nothing but a sequencing problem…”
That could easily enough be checked if one could get the data. Just plot a person’s birth date on one axis and serial# on the other, and look to see how many outliers there were. Then follow up on what the causes were. Finally, compare O’Bumpkin’s data to all the others to see if it made sense.
The trick would be to get the data, and as long ago as that was, it would probably be pretty hard to track down why any outliers occurred. I can’t imagine there wouldn’t be any at all.
28 July, 2009 at 7:50 pm
IT IS NO JOKING MATTER…
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13189
AND IT IS NOT GOING AWAY…
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13205
I guess the question is if we are going to quit before he cracks, or they get desperately violent.
28 July, 2009 at 8:00 pm
Thanks for the link.
Yup, as I’ve said before, even if Obama was born on U.S. soil, it still doesn’t matter because his father was Kenyan, and NOT a U.S. citizen. That gave Obama dual citizenship, which is exactly what the framers of the Constitution were trying to eliminate when drafting the “natural born” clause in Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
Unfortunately, it is up to the Supreme Court to decide if they will adhere to the original intent of the “natural born” clause, or, as I suspect, “re-interpret” the law based on “Progressive” relativism…
Cheers
18 January, 2011 at 7:44 pm
After what came out today,it is unlikely that we will be able to get a bet down on Obama’s leaving office.As predicted in 2008,the jig will be up………and gone!
1 April, 2012 at 6:48 pm
[...] House Dems are on the Front Lines as ObamaCare Gets its Day in Court: Where’s FosterObama’s Original Birth Certificate DOES Exist!!! [...]