AGW Fleecing the West
Right on the money:
It’s never been about global warming
By Klaus Rohrich – CFP
Anyone who believes that the Kyoto Accord and all the subsequent meetings spearheaded by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), is actually about global warming or climate change, would be well advised to submit a wish list to Santa Claus in care of the North Pole. Chances of having jolly St. Nick deliver what’s on that list are better than the chances of stopping global warming. That’s because global warming has already stopped with no help from Al Gore and his friends.
In fact, recent scientific discoveries have found the smoking gun of global warming isn’t actually smoking when it was revealed that some of the IPCC’s data were, um, fudged. The IPCC’s lead scientist, Keith Briffa has attempted to debunk archeological and historic records about the medieval warm period, when Greenland was actually green, using as proof tree core samples taken from Siberia’s Yamal Peninsula. Only problem is, upon peer review of his 1995 paper, Dr. Briffa was discovered to have cherry-picked the core samples in order to support his assertion that the planet is warming. There were a total of 252 core samples taken from the trees at Yamal and Briffa used a total of three to support his hypothesis.
Other scientists, also working for the IPCC have arrived at the same conclusion, using the same data, which was finally exposed as having been “cooked” by Canadian mathematician Steve McIntyre, who had written countless letters to the IPCC and its individual climate scientists asking for the raw data that were used to arrive at their conclusions.
Another bit of proof consistently offered by the IPCC that the earth is warming is the so-called “hockey stick” graph that provided proof positive that the planet was undergoing unprecedented warming. But Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick proved that the math used at arriving at the “hockey stick” graph was hokey, at which point the narrative changed to “yes, the math is flawed, but global warming is still a crisis, even if there isn’t a hockey stick.”
And so it goes. What hasn’t occurred to most who have bought into the global warming hysteria is that it’s never been about global warming or climate change, for that matter. The whole global warming craze is a massive Ponzi scheme designed to separate wealthy nations from their wealth and pass it over to developing nations without them having to actually go through the process of creating and earning that wealth. It’s a gigantic global welfare scheme that if it comes to fruition, will equalize the wealth of all nations, making poor nations wealthier. It will also make wealthy nations poorer.
In fact, as the proponents of climate hysteria come to realize that developed nations’ citizenry may not be on board for a gigantic wealth transfer, they are looking at other avenues to facilitate separating wealthy nations from their money.
One such way is through class-action lawsuits. Recently the “Asian Peoples’ Climate Court” in Bangkok found the G8 guilty of “planetary malpractice” in violation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. A mock trial heard a case “filed” on behalf of children from Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal, the Philippines and Thailand.
Antonio Oposa, a Filipino environmental lawyer believes that such legal action isn’t far off, as developing nations sue so-called “over-consuming countries” for environmental damages. Mr. Oposa went on to say “The countries most affected in Asia and Africa will begin to stand up and take action if they get nothing from Copenhagen.”
So you see, it isn’t about global warming or even climate change. It’s about the Third World fleecing the West without actually having to create that wealth for itself.
And by the way, those endangered polar bears? There are more of them today than at any point in recent history.
I would just like to add that this whole Anthropogenic Global Warming Ponzi scheme comes down to control: Control of YOU by the New World Orderers.
17 October, 2009 at 3:51 am
This is too true. Check out WUWT.
We’re all in trouble.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/16/obama-poised-to-cede-us-sovereignty-in-copenhagen-claims-british-lord-monckton/
“….So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not….”
17 October, 2009 at 8:13 am
Live free or die hard they can make the call I don’t care anymore about their threats. Obama is nothing more than a tinpot African dictator. He wants our whole country to end up like Detroit where when free money is handed out there is a line a mile long or maybe his is vision is Chicongo. I don’t care what it is I would rather fight than switch.
My prediction is that Obama and his cronies will split the USA, civil war, who knows. I know one thing for sure none of these people have any say in anything in the country we rebuild out of the ashes.
Long ago we set up a country for Africans in America who don’t like living in America it is called Liberia. I suggest that Obama move there, later we will insist.
A nation cannot survive these people anyhow so what have we got to lose?
17 October, 2009 at 9:14 am
Oh and most of the lawyers that were responsible for what has gone on and the police who have stood by and allowed it to occur, they are going to end up with them not us. We will take guys like Sherriff Joe but he will be able to kick back on the porch and take it easy. We will not have the crime problems that they will have. No, we will need a wall to keep these people out. We can police ourselves there will be no need for any large law enforcement organizations. You blow it this bad and you get no second chances.
17 October, 2009 at 4:35 pm
Amen brother.
“You believed until now that tyrants exist? Well! You were wrong, there are only slaves: where no one obeys, no one can command.” Anselme Bellagarrigue
Who provides most of the funding and firepower for the UN…How do they enforce this if we say no, whether Obama signs it or not?
The Senate is not likely to ratify it, especially after Nov 3. Interesting thing. There is a special election being held to fill a seat vacated by one of Odumbo’s nominees. The GOP candidate is running solid conservative against a typical liberal wacko. They are in a statistical tie in SAN FRANCISCO. Obama was in SF yesterday and there were thousands of protestors there. If NJ, VA and this district in SF go GOP, that’s going to scare the snot out of a buynch of vulnerable Dims. Unless they plan to fix or end elections…in which case we’re back to the 2A option only.
Seriously, I don’t think there’s any way around civil war in the end. Two countries in the same borders, no acceptable compromises possible or likely…only one way it can go. Even if we took back complete control of gov’t, the wackos would not sit peacefully as we return to a Constitutional Republic.
17 October, 2009 at 9:30 am
The primary data, prepared at some UK university in the 80’s definitely proves there is global warming. Unfortunately the University had run out of space and deleted the data. I am not kidding, this is what they said when a request was made to examine the source.
17 October, 2009 at 9:32 am
tgusa, I’m with you 100%!
17 October, 2009 at 10:02 am
United We Stand blanco.
17 October, 2009 at 9:34 am
http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=5791
Here is another one where the data mysteriously disappears.
17 October, 2009 at 10:36 am
And other countries had better take note. Do not be fooled by the slip stream media. Those stuck on the other side when the curtain comes down will be losers. We will no longer trade with the enemy.
Take China for instance, do the Chinese want to risk it all by siding with their side? Well they are going to be stuck trying to collect from them later. On the other hand, if China shows itself to have supported capitalist freedom loving Americans (their largest market) we will not forget. Either way, these countries make the call, act wisely.