What Did Our Founding Fathers Think of “Equality”
An interesting read:
What is Equality?
By Larrey Anderson – American Thinker
President Obama recently spoke to the Human Rights Campaign about “equality.” Here is how he began his speech:
Thank you so much, all of you. It is a privilege to be here tonight to open for Lady GaGa. I’ve made it. (Laughter.) I want to thank the Human Rights Campaign for inviting me to speak and for the work you do every day in pursuit of equality on behalf of the millions of people in this country who work hard in their jobs and care deeply about their families — and who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. [Emphasis added.]
I don’t know much about the singer Lady GaGa. But I do know a little about equality: there is no such thing.
The myth of equality started in the late 18th century. The successful American Revolution (which had nothing to do with equality) guaranteed “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” The failed French Revolution promised “Liberté, égalité, fraternité,” (liberty, equality, fraternity). It disintegrated into the Reign of Terror.
The French discovered (long before the Soviets and the Communist Chinese) that equality among human beings is impossible. Utopians on the left continue to ignore those lessons.
Our Founding Fathers were fully aware of the dangers of the state trying to impose “equality” on its citizens. The specific word “equality” does not appear, anywhere, in either the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution. Variations of the word “equal” (“equal” and “equally”) appear twice in the Declaration of Independence and eight times in the Constitution. Let’s take a look at the appropriate appearances of the word “equal” in our founding documents.
The two appearances of the word “equal” in the Declaration of Independence both refer to a “starting point” for human beings under the law. The first line of the Declaration of Independence reads in part:
“… to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them …” [Emphasis added.]
In other words, if people are not treated equally before the law by their government, they may “dissolve the political bands.” Stated differently, if all citizens do not have equal protection under the law, they have a right to overthrow the regime. This has nothing to do with the state making people equal, or forcing them to be equal, or guaranteeing that all citizens are equal – this is a revolutionary statement about overthrowing an unjust regime.
The second use is the famous one:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Our Founding Fathers believed that we have the same rights “coming out of the box,” so to speak. But after that … all bets are off. The government protects only three things: life, liberty and property.[i] It does not make us equal. God takes care of that.
Let’s move to the Constitution [...]
CLICK HERE to continue reading this over at the American Thinker.
Explore posts in the same categories: History, Myth Busting
18 October, 2009 at 1:06 pm
It is really fairly simple, Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, our fundamental rights that come from God not man and certainly not from a guvmint or individual leader. We all have a right to go about our lives in this way, we have the right to practice these rights as long as we don’t violate anothers use of the same that is what assures us all of freedom of thought and expression. They are a two way street, these rights mean different things to all of us. Forcing anyone to accept anything is a violation of those rights. Marriage, was conceived specifically to define a man/woman bond to each other. If two guys want to tie the knot, so to speak, no one is stopping them from coming up with their own marriage type of idea those are their rights but so too do the man and the woman have their rights.
Something from the past sums up these fundamenal rights on an individual basis, Dont Tread On Me.
18 October, 2009 at 1:17 pm
Live Free or Die!
18 October, 2009 at 2:09 pm
We should all learn the message of the NFL. Oh I know you might say, what does that have to do with it? Well first of all we all saw the lefts definition of equality in their America. Long ago there was race based discrimination in sports but that’s all over now and equality has produced what? Ideological discrimination, and shamefully from many of those who’s fathers of grandfathers may have suffered through discrimination. With the left it is not about equality, ever, their anger and hatred have turned them in to exactly what they would say that they most abhor. With the left it is about taking other peoples creations, ideas, money and rights and then twisting them in to a contorted image of what the left wants it to be.
Equality with Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, no, not without conformity.
Ah ha, Revolutionary war quote duel eh?
I have not yet begun to fight!
18 October, 2009 at 2:24 pm
Most Americans have a difficult time confronting hatred they choose to distance themselves from it instead. That is one reason we are having so much trouble with the current ideology that has declared an all out war of hatred against us. But make no mistake, although they don’t have a particular name for their entity the left is no different than that enemy except in the fact that they follow in lockstep with their current leader, regardless of who that might be. That’s why I sometimes refer to the left as the American Taliban.
You can join them but you had better be ready to do as they say, and don’t forget lefties, at any time that can change, and you will be left in the same position as Rush and the rest of us.
19 October, 2009 at 6:37 am
tgusa,
I agree with the moral foundations that the US was built on is one of the aspects that makes the US amongst a number of great countries but I wonder/question some of your points and I certainly would not agree wtih the left as the American Taliban.
Though I am also against gay-marriages and have conservative moral values, are you not spouting freedom and the right to do as you like and yet forcing your view and telling people to thus “do as we say”?
It is just a question, but it comes from the basis that the far-right is as bad as the far-left in that both fall into radicalism and eventually it means that they will “tell you what to do”. Once will tell you what to do as a manifesto/committe controlling administration and laws – the other will tell you what to do based on their own “moral/ethical” agenda.
The Taliban term fails because it refers to their tribalism/religious mix and historical control-structure. They have two facets that are from both the left and the right (as above), they are tribal council and personality run and at the same time they state that their moral values have to be forced upon others.
Just thoughts and intested in your reply comments.
19 October, 2009 at 10:35 am
Did you read me saying that I wanted to force anyone to live in my country? It is not me that is the invader.
I have read your posts and I have observed that you really don’t know anything about America from a firsthand experience its all heresay and dated. I don’t really understand why you comment on things you really know noting about. I have to assume that you are a leftist they do the same thing over here. Besides you spend too much time telling us what you are another leftist favorite. Are you a leftist? You can tell us we are not the American Taliban. I think it is a good thing for the rest of the world to try to understand what is going on here but learn the ground truth not the air truth.
By the way your description of the Taliban is a perfect description of the American left (American Taliban). As I said, before you spout find out what people really think. Its not like I just started posting yesterday.
The real deal solkhar, on 9-11 many Americans changed while most of the world stayed the same. We are not going back to the way that it was. Not 75 years ago we rescued Europe from a fascist nightmare, 75 years, do you really think that Europe has anything to say to us that we should listen to? I don’t.
I’m not going to lie to you in an effort to make friends with you and I’m not going to go back in time and explain anything either. Figure it out for yourself but be careful, facts matter, the truth is very important. Decide for yourself where you stand there is no middle ground. Choose wisely as it may be the last decision you ever make. No you don’t have to worry about us doing you harm It appears that you will do enough of that to yourself.
Cheers.
20 February, 2010 at 6:57 pm
Are you sure that equality is impossible? What is logically impossible about equality? A logical impossibility is something like having a front without having a back. I dont think there is such a logical impossibility about equality.
Furthermore, do you really think that the american revolution was successful simply because it had a different slogan than the french revolution? I mean, if you honestly think that the only difference between the two revolutions was the slogan, then I would hate to find out how you weigh your decisions.
By the way, your argument that equality is impossible because the french or the chinese or the soviets failed to achieve it is simply brilliant. Its like saying, ‘well i watched someone trying to learn to ride a bike, but they couldnt, therefore it is impossible to ride a bike’. That is sound logic. Good work.