Obama’s Counterterror Adviser Says Jihad is a ‘Legitimate Tenet of Islam’
Yup. He fatuously believes Jihad is just an inner spiritual struggle and has nothing to do with killing infidels. What a fool:
Counterterror Adviser Defends Jihad as ‘Legitimate Tenet of Islam’
Published May 27, 2010 – FOX News
The president’s top counterterrorism adviser on Wednesday called jihad a “legitimate tenet of Islam,” arguing that the term “jihadists” should not be used to describe America’s enemies.
During a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, John Brennan described violent extremists as victims of “political, economic and social forces,” but said that those plotting attacks on the United States should not be described in “religious terms.”
He repeated the administration argument that the enemy is not “terrorism,” because terrorism is a “tactic,” and not terror, because terror is a “state of mind” — though Brennan’s title, deputy national security adviser for counterterrorism and homeland security, includes the word “terrorism” in it. But then Brennan said that the word “jihad” should not be applied either.
“Nor do we describe our enemy as ‘jihadists’ or ‘Islamists’ because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one’s community, and there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children,” Brennan said.
The technical, broadest definition of jihad is a “struggle” in the name of Islam and the term does not connote “holy war” for all Muslims. However, jihad frequently connotes images of military combat or warfare, and some of the world’s most wanted terrorists including Usama bin Laden commonly use the word to call for war against the West.
Brennan defined the enemy as members of bin Laden’s Al Qaeda network and “its terrorist affiliates.”
But Brennan argued that it would be “counterproductive” for the United States to use the term, as it would “play into the false perception” that the “murderers” leading war against the West are doing so in the name of a “holy cause.”
“Moreover, describing our enemy in religious terms would lend credence to the lie propagated by Al Qaeda and its affiliates to justify terrorism — that the United States is somehow at war against Islam,” he said.
The comment comes after Brennan, in a February speech in which he described his respect for the tolerance and devotion of Middle Eastern nations, referred to Jerusalem on first reference by its Arabic name, Al-Quds.
“In all my travels the city I have come to love most is al-Quds, Jerusalem, where three great faiths come together,” Brennan said at an event co-sponsored by the White House Office of Public Engagement and the Islamic Center at New York University and the Islamic Law Students Association at NYU.
Explore posts in the same categories: politics
27 May, 2010 at 10:20 am
We cannot describe the enemy as jihadists, ok, lets call them John Brennan’s instead.
27 May, 2010 at 10:36 am
His mouth says no but his massive security team says yes. I really don’t think Americans can afford this kind of thinking in more ways than one. Who does he think is paying for his security team? Well its not the leftard agitators or illegal aliens its Tea Party Americans. Go ahead and screw us John but don’t cry when you are stripped of your crack security team.
Actually, John should put his money where his mouth is, take a jihadists into his home, travel around like the rest of us do, show me. Come on John there is nothing really to fear, right? You sound terrorized John, but that’s just my opinion.
27 May, 2010 at 10:43 am
Hmmm thats weird…
Under djihad in the ‘concise encycvlopedia of islam’ by H.A.R. Gibb and J.H. Kramers says..
“Djihad… Holy war… The spread of islam by arms is a religious duty upon muslims in general…” (Page 89)
Appearently John Brennan is using CAIRs definition about Jihad than other authors.
27 May, 2010 at 11:35 am
The jihadists or whatever they are have to be rejoicing at their luck. You could even say that every time an American official opens their mouth they reinforce jihadist ideology. Smart stupid.
27 May, 2010 at 1:53 pm
“Nor do we describe our enemy as ‘jihadists’ or ‘Islamists’ because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one’s community, and there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children,” Brennan said.
Does this mean Mr. Brennan agrees with Adjum Chaudri and Shiek Omar Bakri?
Mr. Anjum Chaudri in England said only Muhammedan are innocent
Shiek Omar Bakri said that only Muhammedan are innocent,
Does this mean that the current regime views the Christmas bomber, and the Time Square bomber perpatrating legitimate Jihad against “Non-innocents” or those “arrogant Americans”?
Given the Obamessiahs disdain for all things and people American, I’d have to say that it seems this way.
27 May, 2010 at 2:26 pm
As I have stated in other comments, this presentation by this spineless, apologist, butt kissing, lapdog was lacking only one element, Comrade Brennen was not on his knees. No one in this administration makes a statement or presentation unless it is authorized by our ‘Dear Leader’s’ Ministry of truth and propaganda. We don’t need this clown’s speeches to know where the loyalties of this devious, sellout administration lie.