CAIR Wants Media To Do Away With Use Of The Word “Islamist”
Sure, I’ll do away with using the word “Islamist.”—Just as soon as Ibrahim Hooper does away with the word “Islamophobe.”
(Fat chance of that, buddy):
(WASHINGTON, D.C., 1/3/13) — The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) today distributed a commentary urging media outlets to drop the term “Islamist” because it is “currently used in an almost exclusively pejorative context.”
By Ibrahim Hooper
As many people make promises to themselves to improve their lives or their societies in the coming year, here is a suggested New Year’s resolution for media outlets in America and worldwide: Drop the term “Islamist.”
Unfortunately, the term “Islamist” has become shorthand for “Muslims we don’t like.” It is currently used in an almost exclusively pejorative context and is often coupled with the term “extremist,” giving it an even more negative slant.
There are few, if any, positive references to “Islamist” in news articles. There are also no — nor should there be — references to “Christianists,” “Judaists” or “Hinduists” for those who would similarly seek governments “in accord with the laws” of their respective faiths.
No journalist would think of referring to the “Judaist government of Israel,” the “Christianist leader Rick Santorum” or “Hinduist Indian politician Narendra Modi,” while use of “Islamist” has become ubiquitous. It might be an interesting exercise to hold a contest, the winner of which would be the first to find a positive mainstream media reference to “Islamist.”
False argument, Ibrahim.
Besides, even the New York Times has called Israel’s government, “Jewish.” (CLICK HERE for the link to the NYT’s corrections page and note the usage of the phrase, “the Jewish government,” in its first correction item).
I’d say that fits quite neatly into your “Judaist government” criteria, Ibrahim. What are you? A Jewophobe?
Quite likely, such a contest would end up being similar to a unicorn hunt.
The frequent linkage of the term “Islamist” to violence and denial of religious and human rights is also strongly promoted by Islamophobic groups and individuals who seek to launch rhetorical attacks on Islam and Muslims, without the public censure that would normally accompany such bigoted attacks on any other faith.
Aha! There it is! Still using the term Islamophobe, are we, Ibrahim? Why is it that you want to control our language, but we can’t touch yours?
What are you? A hypocrite? Or, should I say, “Islamocrite?!”
By not dropping or modifying use of the term, the media are making a political and religious value judgment each time it is used.
As are you, Ibrahim, every time you use that ridiculous word Islamophobe! See the hypocrisy here, Ibrahim?
That is hardly fair or balanced.
Hey, like I said, if all you Muzzy-headed types would just stop using the word Islamophobe, I’d be more than happy to stop using the word Islamist.
Now, THAT is truly “fair and balanced!”—Unlike Ibrahim Hooper’s one-sided request for the media to stop using the term Islamist.
Stupid muzzy.Explore posts in the same categories: By Doctor Bulldog, CAIR, Freedom of Speech, know your enemy, Multiculturalism, muslim Intolerance, Muslim whining, Muslims in The USA, Religiocide, Religion