Is Obama’s Birth Certificate a Forgery?

If you go to Obama’s website, fightthesmears.com, you will notice that he claims to have released his birth certificate and even provides a link with a copy of it for proof.

However, if you look closely, you will notice that the font is problematic in that the only typewriter available at that time which Mrs. Bulldog and I could think of that would be able to duplicate such a font is the IBM Selectric which was introduced on… Drum roll please…. July 23, 1961 – Obama was born August 4th, 1961 and the birth certificate featured on Obama’s website was filed on August 6th, 1961…

It seems odd to us that a Hospital in Hawaii would have had access to such a typewriter just a couple of weeks after its introduction…

It may be nothing, but it piqued our curiosity and so, after a little googling, we discovered an article from the future (June 20th) on Townhall.com that seems to cast doubt on Obama’s birth certificate.

Now, I’m not saying that Obama is lying, but he is a politician and there are some apparently interesting inconsistencies in his birth certificate that need clarification by unbiased experts more qualified than us before we’ll give him the benefit of the doubt:

Was Obama’s “Certificate of Birth” manufactured?
TownHall.com
Posted by Polarik on Friday, June 20, 2008 12:00:00 AM

The Daily Kos blog has posted a JPG that allegedly is Barack Obama’s “Certificate of Birth.” From a detailed analysis of the image and the text, it looks like it was created by a graphics program, and is not a true copy of an original, certified document.

I’ve been working with computers, printers, and typewriters for over 20 years, and given a set of printed letters, I can discern what kind of device made them. Printer output is quite different from the text created by a graphics program, and even if a document looks “official,” it may not be.

The “Certificate of Birth,” which I will call “COB,” is posted on the Kos website as a color JPG. The reason for making it a color JPG, IMHO, is to induce the viewer to believe that this is a genuine copy of an original document — something that a black & white, or even greyscale, reproduction would not convey as well.

Basically, anyone could have produced this document on his or her own computer, and I’ll tell you why.

[Click on Image to Enlarge]

As represented by the JPG, the “original” COB seems to be a sheet of paper measuring 8.09″ x 7.90″ with a green “Rattan” pattern embedded in, or printed on, the paper and a “Bamboo mat” pattern for its border:

At the bottom of the JPG image, reading right from left, one can see following text:

OHSM 1.1 (Rev. 11/01) Laser This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding. [HRS 338-13(b), 338-19]

There are a lot of problems with this statement, foremost of which is that the text in this document were produced by a graphics program and not a laser print, or any other printer, for that matter.

If the letters were made by a laser printer, you would be able to see the background, the pattern, through the spaces of the letters.

Click Here to Continue Reading this at Town Hall

Update:  Here is a copy of a Hawaiian Birth Certificate.  These are not photo-copies of the original, but are “duplicates” printed on a laser printer (note the lower left hand corner where it says rev. 11/01 Laser).

So, that explains the font problem, however, take notice that the characters do not have the fringing problem associated with Obama’s record of birth that blocks out the background of the certificate.  Also, in the following photo, notice the raised seal that is clearly visible and the fold lines from mailing the birth certificate.  Not so on Obama’s…  Bottom line, I’m starting to suspect that Obama’s record of birth has been created with the help of a photoshop type program…

Any one out there with experience in this field care to comment, or is it time I put my tin foil hat on?

Explore posts in the same categories: politics, suspicious

45 Comments on “Is Obama’s Birth Certificate a Forgery?”

  1. scarlet pimpernel Says:

    Just keep finding stuff, and can’t let it go, but at least its getting in print somewhere, right?

    Did this go under the radar perhaps?

    A flurry of birth certificate abberations/changes/excuses for retyping, certificates for people born “out of state” and apparently some emergency money to fund this new
    legislative flurry of time and paper products on the part of the State of Hawaii just recently.

    And it all got passed on Election Eve…huh?

    google HRS 338-14.5 State of Hawaii and read through to 338-20.

    All under Vol. 06 Ch 0321-0344 on that date.

    My question–how is the Supreme Court allowed to be so corrupt as to refuse to expose this? We seem to have morphed into Tailand, or something, while everyone was actually watching.

    Be afraid, people. Be very afraid, as the blacks like to joke. This Hawaiin “coincidence” is serious as a full-on coronary.

    btw, bulldog, I found your website by googling
    “obama’s fake birth certificate AND IBM selectric type”. 🙂


  2. Scarlet,

    I hadn’t seen that. Thanks for the info, I’ll check it out.

    BTW – Did you know that Hawaii allows foreigners to get legal Birth Certificates issued to them? Yup. Check out the following:

    A. From Hawaii’s official Department of Health, Vital Records webpage: “Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country” (applies to adopted children).

    B. A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a hospital of birth under HRS 338-5.

    C. Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births under HRS 338-17.8. A foreign birth presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth certificate.

    D. Hawaiian law, however, expressly acknowledges that its system is subject to error. See, for example, HRS 338-17.

    E. Hawaiian law expressly provides for verification in lieu of certified copy of a birth certificate under HRS 338-14.3.

    F. Even the Hawaii Department of Home Lands does not accept a certified copy of a birth certificate as conclusive evidence for its homestead program. From its web site: “In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”

    Now that we all understand that you can be born in Madagascar, Russia, Norway, Brazil or even Kenya like Obama and still have a REAL birth certificate that both Snopes and Factcheck would say was real since they are real. That doesn’t mean you were born in Hawaii. Does this matter to America?


  3. I found the above when Googling for the “HRS 338-14” you referenced.

    Cheers

  4. scarlet pimpernel Says:

    Now. Is it even possible that no one else has even stumbled upon this? Including Keyes and the other guy in the S. Court case? That is so hard to believe, yet why has no one mentioned this massive covering of a bizarre birth certificate scam trail?

    I’m telling you, this is almost too much for the mind to encompass, unless someone else has already checked this out and has knowledge that this apparent super-nova Hawaii-gate might be just that. Where is Mrs. Bulldog when I need her?

    And if one were to check the history of all of 338-14 through 338-20 (including the fact that new money was needed to do all this so that was the first step as in 338-14, I believe I remember) then my evil twin would want to know…

    1. What is the exact day the very first paper was submitted and by whom prior to actually signing this strangeness into cement on November 3rd of 2008, a few hours before we would have a new foreign-born president and leader of the entire world;

    2. What is the correlation of said first paper being submitted to whom, and the visits of the object of the legislation who spent much time in Hawaii visiting the dying, rather than paying a few bucks to have the dying moved to Chicago, where the most intense and state of the art hospitals exist–that’s a btw, and a purposeful aside, not a digression;

    3. Are those behind this guilty of actual treason, in addition to felony misdeamors, dismissal from jobs, and jail time in a spa federal prison somewhere?

    4. Does the act of creating a false birth certificate for the purpose of overtturning the government by a socialist/Marxist backed, supported and funded semi-dictator for the first time (now, I KNOW, I know, this is all with enthusiastic public worship and approval, applause, weeping and jumping for joy on the part of even Republican’s as they tell me) amount to classic treason?

    5. No one in office would dare to do such things withoug the approval of either God from Heaven or the Prince of Darkness and his financial backing from below (as in the names most bantered around), so which one was it? That’s a real quandry, isn’t it.

    HOw high up did it go to have Bush and the White House simply ignore the idea completely and to my evil twin’s mind, therefore conspire with Does 1-99 to bury it and do nothing. Absolutely not a phone call or memo to anyone, anywhere, in any department.

    And this only leads to worse questions, so let’s stop short of a brain explosion/coma.

    But it is fun stuff to play with, no?

  5. scarlet pimpernel Says:

    http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0007.htmh

    Ah. At last. by using previous and next you have the whole strangeness. Scroll to the bottom, link the vol, and you will see 338 set in stone only one day prior to the election. Read each one. They couldn’t be more fascinating. They cover every little rock that could possibly be unturned.
    This was genius in concept. But only for a citizenry sooooooo stupid and preoccupied that they deserve to slowly disappear into the other-world- around-us-Hell.

    Or quickly. Depends on whose timetable you are privy to. It’s like the Arctic– you just have to keep watching it to see how quick it’s melting down to mush.

    As you can see, I find this too interesting.

    And Hawaii holds many, many mysteries more fascinating than some thriller movies. Perhaps inquiring minds should rejuvenate themselves.

  6. scarlet pimpernel Says:

    forgive my ignorance, you already have found the stuff in question.

    How does one research legislation. Oh boy.

  7. thepimpernel Says:

    Dear bulldog. Thank you for letting me rant down my thoughts here, and have saved them elsewhere for whatever, and would now like to remove them from this blog site–redundant info and perhaps a waste of e-space. How is that done?

    And I see your point now. Perhaps it is pointless. (Or not…)

    But, I am thrilled to say that I found the Mother Lode of what we speak. This Brave Soul puts his life on the line I believe, and is a must-read.

    http://www.colony14.net/id41.html

    If you get the google instead, it is “O’s Timetable”, now at #1 on the search.

    That is if you don’t already know about this url. I’ve rarely been as clueless as this b.c. thing has shown me to be.


  8. Are you really sure you want all your comments removed? I can do it, but I don’t understand why you would want to do that. There’s a lot of good information contained therein for others to read.

    Cheers

  9. thepimpernel Says:

    o.k., but you know how it went throughout Europe in the 40’s, 50’s, and that’s the way this country is barreling at a speed that is almost heart-stopping.

    O. rules the known world, and as that gravel voiced old NWO’er, Kiss., has proclaimed to the world:
    “Pres. O is in a position to now lead the world into a N.. World O….

    An articulate, properly skin-toned puppet which even blonde germans–if we are to believe that–wept and ventured out into the elements to cheer. That seemed to me the ultimate madness of NWOism.

    The software I fear, Esch….., only reads key words chatter, so therefore I talk in cyber-speak. And that waaaaaay too much. I only speak of O, as in Oz, wizard of.

    So leave it I guess, but read the other thing please!

  10. thepimpernel Says:

    yes, I will have thoughts to share on our friends to the South, but need to get my facts gathered if you haven’t already seen them all. As in the proposed “A-m-e-r-o-s”, as in the world divided into 3 neat areas, with one major bank; puppet prince/president over each of the 3, etc. As in the Tri-lat. As in the rule of Beelzebub.

  11. Taylor Says:

    The COLB at the bottem of the article is more fake then BHO’s COLB…

    Hawaii USA 1930???

  12. CavMom Says:

    Taylor ~ Hawaii became a territory on July 6, 1898.

    Why do you find it odd that Hawaii, USA is on the COLB in 1930?

    I just googled a Puerto Rican birth certificate and found:

    Departamento de Salud de Puerto Rico, USA
    translates to: Department of Health Puerto Rico, USA

  13. mike davis Says:

    http://blog.pennlive.com/politics/2009/07/obamas_birth_certificate_avail.html

    here – copy paste this into your address bar and educate yourselves… sorry i dont buy fox news bull$hit… he was really born in the usa…
    From Hawaii’s official Department of Health, Vital Records webpage: “Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country” (applies to adopted children).
    (applies to adopted children).
    (applies to adopted children).
    not just any illegal immigrant – so all this psycho babble bullshit turns out to be just that.
    so follow that link, there is the real certificate with the seal that some people pointed out on the previous post that was missing…One interesting development I had never seen before. When we sent our own researchers to Hawaii to check on Obama’s birth certificate, they found that Dept. of Health records had gone digital and none of the original documents remain. That would presumably include original documents pertaining to Obama.

    Which means the authenticated and official birth certificate IS the official and authentic document, which means: There’s nothing left to talk about.


    • Number one: That is NOT his REAL birth certificate. It is a short form certificate of live birth. A REAL birth certificate shows what hospital you were born in and what doctor delivered you. I have a copy of my deceased daughter’s birth certificate from Hawaii. It is the long form! Yes, you CAN get a long form or a short form, depending on what you ask for when you request a certified copy of your Hawaiian Birth Certificate.

      Number two: You are repeating a lie by CNN. You state that the Dept. of Health does not have the original documents because they went digital and destroyed the originals. THAT IS BULLSHIT. That cover story was started by CNN’s John Klien who tried to shut up Lou Dobbs about the Long Form birth certificate by telling him that his researchers had determined that the original long form birth certificates had been destroyed, which Lou Dobbs relayed to his viewers. However, it was an obvious lie, and I even called Lou Dobbs out on it. A few days later, the Department of Health in Hawaii made this statement:

      I am not aware of any birth certificate records that have been destroyed by the department,” Janice Okubo, public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, told WND. “When the department went electronic in 2001, vital records, whether in paper form or any other form, [were] maintained. We don’t destroy records.”

      Okubo affirmed that beginning in 2001, all vital records, including birth records, moved to electronic formats.

      “Any records that we had in paper or any other form before 2001 are still in file within the department,” she insisted. “We have not destroyed any vital statistics records that we have.”

      Number 3: Obama admits that he was born with dual citizenship. His father was NOT and American citizen. Ergo, Obama is NOT Natural Born as understood by the Framers of the Constitution.

      Now, If I may have my fun playing with your last sentence:

      Which means the short form Certificate of Birth is not THE official and authentic document, which means: There’s everything left to talk about!

  14. mike davis Says:

    ohhh and eff the NEW WORLD ORDER –
    if its true and America starts to see a transformation into the AMERICAN UNION – the whole nation will revolt and we would again see a revolution… i dont know anyone who would just sit back an let it happen… WOULD YOU ?????? Hell no you wouldnt!
    -we all would be preparing for war. i would easily give my life to fight for the country as i know it – the whole country wouldnt just go with the flow and watch billions die to be enslaved.
    QUIT blaming Obama for Bushs mistakes… hmmm maybe not spending 70 billion a month on a war for 9 years would solve our economic issues. WAKE UP!, people want to point their fingers like thats going to solve anything. eff the democrats, eff the republicans even more, and eff the liberals even more !!! this country is about THE PEOPLE, and it will be forever !

  15. tgusa Says:

    Before you begin labeling others tards mike maybe you ought to look in the miiror.
    What are the rules for a natural born citizen mike? Two parents that are US citizens, why do you have trouble understanding that? If there ever is a revolution I want to be miles away from you, you probably couldn’t spot the enemy you might even kill some of your own instead.

    • tgusa Says:

      I suppose it is ok with you to insult every American throughout history that had two citizen parents. No problem huh? Sort of a screw you attitude you have there mike.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: