Good News: Minnesota Muzzie Cab Drivers Lose Another Round in Court

Queue the music!

Muslim cabbies lose round in court
via USA Today

ST. PAUL, Minnesota (AP) — Muslim cab drivers whose religious beliefs go against driving passengers who carry alcohol have lost another round in court.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday against the cab drivers’ attempt to block penalties for refusing service.

An ordinance adopted by the Metropolitan Airports Commission last year revokes a cab driver’s license for 30 days for refusing a fare at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. A second refusal brings a two-year revocation.

A large share of the cabbies who serve the airport are Somali Muslims, and many of them believe that Islamic law prohibits them from giving rides to people carrying alcohol. Since the commission began keeping track in 2002, there have been over 5,200 recorded instances of cabbies refusing service to passengers at the airport, including a “significant percentage” of passengers carrying alcohol, which is sometimes visible through bags or in wine boxes, the appeals court noted.

The issue had simmered for several years before the commission decided the penalties were needed to ensure that customers would get reliable taxi service at the airport, and that compromises proposed by the drivers were impractical.

Explore posts in the same categories: Justice System, muslim Intolerance, Religion

6 Comments on “Good News: Minnesota Muzzie Cab Drivers Lose Another Round in Court”

  1. "Islamophobia"=BS Says:

    Next, some basic English lessons would be helpful. But I’ll take my miracles one at a time.


  2. “Islamophobia”=BS,

    LOL!

    Cheers

  3. yonason Says:

    Ditto, “Islamophobia”=BS

    Of course, they are free to go somewhere their Alcohol phobia is tolerated, like Iran. AND GOOD RIDDANCE!

  4. kaafir Says:

    Queue the music!

    Halleluah Chorus anyone?

    🙂

  5. tnr Says:

    Bad news:

    Somalis win prayer case at Gold’n Plump

    The agreement to permit short prayer breaks and accommodate rules against handling pork could set a precedent.

    http://www.startribune.com/business/28119524.html?elr=KArks7PYDiaK7DUdcOy_nc:DKUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU

    and

    http://www.startribune.com/business/28119524.html?page=2&c=y

  6. Hugh E Torrance Says:

    So pork and beer are offensive but murdering is not… ???


Leave a comment