International Think Tank Announces that Iran Will Have Enough Uranium for a Nuclear Bomb This Year

Well, let’s hope that our efforts to subtly sabotage Iran’s nuclear infrastructure (a major covert program that Bush implemented to avoid the military option) will produce the desired results, else we are all in a world of hurt in the near future…


‘Uranium For Iran Nuke In 2009’
January 27, 2009 – Sky News
Geoff Meade, defence correspondent

Iran will have enough enriched uranium to make a single nuclear weapon later this year, the prestigious International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) predicts.

The think tank’s Mark Fitzpatrick made the announcement at today’s launch of its annual global review of military powers.

“During 2009, Iran will probably reach the point at which it has produced the amount of low-enriched uranium needed to make a nuclear bomb.”

“But being able to enrich uranium is not the same as having a nuclear weapon.”

However, the survey reports doubts over US Intelligence estimates that Iran halted its work on nuclear weapons six years ago.

This points to Tehran’s continued development of long-range ballistic missiles able to reach targets in Israel and beyond.

The IISS recommends a mixture of carrot and stick as the best international response.

It concluded a dual policy of engagement and sanctions, testing possibilities for Iranian cooperation while adopting targeted containment strategies, is the best way to deal with Iran’s nuclear programme.

Foreign affairs editor Tim Marshall said: “Several think-tanks have come to the same conclusion.

“The intelligence agencies are more reluctant to put a time frame on it, and the report itself says having enough enriched Uranium to build the warhead is not the same as building the warhead itself.”

Just remember, they love us just as much as they do Israel:


Explore posts in the same categories: Iran, Nuclear, Science, Technology, WWIII Technology

10 Comments on “International Think Tank Announces that Iran Will Have Enough Uranium for a Nuclear Bomb This Year”

  1. Appalled By The World Says:

    Iran refuses to cooperate-it is that simple. Thirty years have shown this to be a fact and yet the world continues to ignore this. Once Iran blackmails Europe the idiots there will demand to know why Washington allowed it to happen even though Europe hamstrung even the minimum efforts made by the US to stop Iran. Now that we have the Supreme Appeaser in the White House the chances of that blackmail happening have gone up a lot.

  2. HasItBeen4YearsYet? Says:

    And Wilders is the one being charged with “hate speech.”

  3. HasItBeen4YearsYet? Says:

    And Wilders is the one being charged with “hate speech.” Go figure.

  4. az_conservative Says:

    Iran will get and use a nuke. It’s inevitable. Obambi and Biden both know it. Remember when Biden said Obama would be tested, and we wouldn’t think his response was right? I think they plan to allow Iran to nuke Israel. In their sick logic, they believe if Israel is wiped out, there will be no more problems in the Middle East… or it gives them the excuse they need to eradicate Muslims (obviously the better choice here). Either way, Israel is expendable as far as these people are concerned.

  5. HasItBeen4YearsYet? Says:

    Wouldn’t it be a surprise if a nuke launched to Tel Aviv went off course and ended up in, say, Damascus? It could happen!

  6. Leatherneck Says:

    That sign should read the secular humanists, and those in government who have sold out to special interests in America are the incarnate of evil, and the Devil.

    But, that would be a bit long. I suppose the moon god worshipers shortend it for that reason.

  7. HasItBeen4YearsYet? Says:


    LOL! Indubitably.

  8. az_conservative Says:


    Damascus would be a kick, but Mecca would be better. Nothing like shooting yourself in the foot.

  9. HasItBeen4YearsYet? Says:

    “Damascus would be a kick, but Mecca would be better. Nothing like shooting yourself in the foot.” — az-conservative

    Yes, either way it couldn’t happen to a more deserving victimhood group of enemies of civilizatioin.

    I just picked Damascus because the Prophet seems to be saying that it will be destroyed. [Isaiah, 17:1] I can’t see Israel or America or even Russia attacking them, but I can see Tehran missing Israel and accidentally targeting them with a nuke. I don’t know that’s how it will happen, and with my batting average it will probably occur some other way. But, it will probably happen. [I say probably ONLY because it’s a general rule in Prophecy that while the good ones MUST happen, the bad ones don’t necessarily have to, at least not in the way we expect them to.]

  10. az_conservative Says:

    I’d be happy with them both being destroyed and a bunch more.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: