Students Forced to Pledge Allegiance to the Obamessiah…

All hail our dark overlord and master:


Pledge of Allegiance Becomes Pledge to Obama

By Alan Gray, NewsBlaze

A parent in the Clark County School District of Las Vegas, Henderson area reported today that his son, who is in 1st grade, came home yesterday saying that he didn’t want to go back to school anymore.

When asked why, the boy said that during the Pledge of Allegiance the teacher put up a large image of Obama next to the flag.

Thinking that the boy might be exaggerating, the man asked his son if he was sure, and suggested that by “large” he might mean an 8×10 photo of the president. The boy apparently said “No, it is a large picture of Obama and when we are done, the teacher turns off the image.”

The same thing was not done for President Bush last year.

After investigating this morning, the other parent reported that what the boy said was true.

At least three of the five classrooms have an overhead projector and as the children stand to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, the teacher turns on the classroom overhead and a full body image of Obama, with six U.S. flags behind him, comes up about 4 feet away from the flag that hangs on the wall. The screen is apparently around five feet by six feet.

In the image, President Obama appears to be staring straight out with no facial expression, just a serious look. All of the kids in each class faced the President, instead of the flag that hangs in the corner.

Local parents are up in arms over this situation. Teachers clearly do not realize the gravity of what they are doing.

[Oh, yes they do!  It’s all about indoctrination and the Cult of Personality!  Read your history!  Hitler, Stalin, Castro…  The list goes on and on.  If you can’t handle history and prefer fiction, might I suggest reading “Animal Farm…”]

Explore posts in the same categories: Orwellian

120 Comments on “Students Forced to Pledge Allegiance to the Obamessiah…”

  1. will the islamaphobe Says:


    Before you get too caught up in your BS almost all bloggers CAN censor others.

    Or do you honestly think that only hte so called ‘islamaphobes’ are ‘stupid’ your pal muslims do the same thing to us.

    Notice this:

    He was banned from multiple muslim blogs and websites for questioning islam.

    Your inabilty to recognize others opinions is your fault.

  2. Akira Says:

    It’s bad enough to be banned from al-Guardian, al-Yahoo, al-BBC etc.

    But I’ve been banned from numerous so-called “conservative” websites [e.g. Western Standard (Ezra Levant), HotAir, Townhall] for stating facts about Islam.

    They insist on promoting a mythical “moderate Islam”, they use term “Islamist” when they mean “Muslim”.

    Here’s typical rotgut from Michael Medved:

    “Is Islam Itself the Enemy?

    “The increasingly popular absolutist position [that Moderation and Islam contradict one another] – whatever its historical, theological or anthropological basis – represents a threat to our short-term security and our long-term success in the very real battle against Islamism. If we accept, let alone embrace, the proposition that Islam itself is our enemy, then all of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims become enemies of the United States, and doom us to unending and un-winnable conflict. … Any public proclamation of overall enmity toward Islam would harm America’s cause in the world at large and undermine our security at home.”

    Translation: Shut up and don’t state facts about Islam because we have US troops in Muslim lands [BTW, where are the “Christian lands”], and we keep importing more and more Muslims, and that puts us in danger from Muslims, so don’t say that Muslims are dangerous.

    Bizarre logic.

    For people like this, all “truth” is relative, and subordinate to political concerns.

    They’re always boasting about all the sacrifices and great things the US has done for Muslims. Boasting about things they should be ashamed of.

  3. Ronin Says:

    This blog is designed to discuss threats to our way of life and freedoms. We owe no one a voice. There are plenty of left leaning blogs. Which BTW we do not visit. Many bloggers stop by here not to discuss issues but to draw traffic to their own sites. If they are allies we normally support them and sometimes link to them. If OTH they are just here to mouth off and start drama, they are gone. I have no time for out of control children.

  4. Ronin Says:


    As you already know, you will win the lotto before you find a true moderate practicing muslim.

    Islam does not allow moderates only apostates and extremists. Question the fools with questions like: so they are moderate to you because they are not violent but still they support, slavery, incest and spousal abuse as allowed in the koran, how is that moderate? Which part of that do you support? Are you ok with your child being married at 9? Would you sleep with your own child? Which gay friend are you willing to murder? You know how this plays out, there are no moderate versions of the cult of islam and the more we point that out, the more they want us to stop. We did not make muslim history but we do expose it. We are also getting better at watching the moderan muslims practice an old craft.

    The bottom line is no supporter of islam can explain away the koran. The only tactics they have is an endless game of “other people are also bad”, or my favorite “only some of us are bad-those guys over there-they are the bad muslims”.

    I could careless what muslims and their friends have to say, I want to see evidence. Show me a moderate muslim state, just one. Is that so hard?

  5. Akira Says:

    A contrast, disproving the concept of “progress”:

    Michael Medved:

    “If we accept, let alone embrace, the proposition that Islam itself is our enemy, then all of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims become enemies of the United States, and doom us to unending and un-winnable conflict. … Any public proclamation of overall enmity toward Islam would harm America’s cause in the world at large and undermine our security at home.”

    John Quincy Adams:

    “In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab [i.e., Muhammad] of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE [Adam’s capital letters]….Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant…While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good will towards men.”

  6. irishoaks Says:

    What do the bloggers here and respectfully, Dr.Bulldog and Ronin, feel that if muslim once, then forever? Of course this is cultural/religion/way-of-life so intwined that it is one that can not be separated. They also feel it is ok to lie to the “outside” to complete their mission. They do not assimilate, accomodate, tolerate. Their entire desire is to domimate the entire world by acceptance of the “faith” or death to the infidel…

  7. Akira Says:

    Re: “What do the bloggers here…feel that if muslim once, then forever? ”

    That doesn’t make sense.

    Most “Muslims” are not really Muslims, in the sense that they don’t really care about jihad and domination etc. But they still spread Islam because they raise their kids as Muslim and try to stop anyone from denigrating Islam, and so on. These are the so-called “moderate” Muslims.

    Anyway, I think that if these people are exposed to real Islam, either through getting straight facts on the internet, or Robert Spenser’s books, or wherever, or by being forced to live under Sharia, then it’s possible that a significant minority might finally wake up and become actively anti-Muslim.

    Just for example, I once went to a party of mostly Iranians — all Muslims — and they were literally wild. Crazy drunk, smoking dope, making out. I mean these were all grad students and very sober and hard-working at university, so I was surprised. Anyway, there was an American Muslim there, from Pakistani parents, and he freaked out and started calling them “animals” and “sluts” etc and started quoting in Arabic. They started shoving him and telling him to shut up. Most were just laughing at him. They finally threw him out in the snow.

    Well, their behaviour was just like crazy teenagers, even though they were all in their late 20s. Every single one of them dreaded the thought of having to go back to Iran. I mean, they wanted to go home and visit, but with a foreign passport in their pocket. So they were all trying to become American or get jobs in Australia, Canada, Germany, etc.

    It’s anecdotal, I know, and they’ll still probably all be nominally “Muslim” but generally I find that people coming from the most rigid Muslim societies are the least “religious” of all.

    So I think that’s the most basic way that people turn away from Islam. I predict the same thing would happen in a place like Indonesia, or perhaps Turkey, if the government tried to enforce real Islam. Right now, they [the majority population] get to live almost like westerners (especially if their rich) but they’ll keep insisting that they’re “devout Muslims”. If Sharia is enforced, then they’ll finally have to make a choice about what they really believe.

    So things can change, sometimes very quickly. Look at the States. A few years ago, many on both the left and the right took it for granted that the US was a major world power and “the Christian right” was in power and so on. Now just a few years later crazed neo-communists are robbing the treasury and promoting every kind of an anti- or un-Christian society.

    + + +

    My belief is that the only way that “the Muslim world” can ever be changed, permanently, and for the better, is by conversion to Christianity. Since I’m a Christian, that might seem like a “partisan” or biased point of view, but I think it can be objectively argued for. It’s already been proven that “the Muslim world” cannot be halted or improved by communism [Afghanistan], socialis, [Syria], pan-Arabism, nationalism [Turkey], decadence [Amsterdam], syncretism [Indonesia]. All of these things are against Islam, but since they’re all perhaps equally corrupt, they can’t overcome Islam. All you end up with is Communist Muslims, Socialist Muslims, Heroin-shooting Muslims, Gay Muslims, partying Muslims, Nationalist Muslims, etc. In the end they’re still Muslim. When they have a crisis they’ll turn to the Koran for “comfort”. And they’ll still give money for mosques and still have Muslim kids.

    And it’s not possible to defeat Islam militarily, especially since they already have nukes in at least one “Muslim nation”, and since war only fires up enough of them to keep going. It is a death cult after all…

    So Christianity seems to me the only thing that can overcome Islam. (Of course, I think it can overcome everything)

    Obviously that’s why someone like Medved would say, “all of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims become enemies of the United States, and doom us to unending and un-winnable conflict”. He can’t imagine that the US could ever become Muslim, and as a Jew he can’t accept that mass (and voluntary of course) conversion to Christianity is either good or possible.

    It seems bleak of course, especially since the west is becoming ever more anti-Christian, and the so-called “Christians” are represented often by morons like the Archbishop of Canterbury or Reverend Wright or Jesse Jackson or Mennonites who give money to Hamas, or Al Gore [seriously, he was voted “Baptist of the Year” a few years ago – seriously! google it], or Tony Blair, or Obama, or this atheist Bible-hating idiot James Hanley who claims he goes to church every Sunday (and I have no reason to doubt him). Is there even a single so-called evangelist or right-wing Christian who will dare to even ask if Islam is by its very nature evil? The only high profile Christian I’ve heard ask that is Pope Benedict. Is there any of the so-called conservative pundits who’ll say that? No, even the most vocal just talk about “Islamists” and the need to support “moderates”

    But maybe (maybe? ha ha) the west is too decadent and soft. Maybe Christianity will be stronger in places like China and Iran, where life and death are more immediate struggles.

  8. hardtohidenow Says:

    It seems you have slandered Ed Darrell.

  9. Leatherneck Says:

    Nothing like a good slandering I say. “Wink, wink, nudge, nudge. Know what I mean? Know what I mean?”

  10. Dave Says:

    Islam is a primitive, stupid and stultifying, barbaric, childish, dangerous, violent religion. Its followers are given to a homocidal fundamentalism. However, Christianity, before it was castrated by the evil atheists and scientists you all like to disparage, was once just as bad. Unlike James, I am an atheist. Your relgion, as your behavior demonstrates, is just as stultifying – if not as capable of producing violently extreme behavior – as Islam. We have no more reason to believe that a man who lived 2000 years ago ascended to heavan after being crucified than we do to believe that another, albeit cruder person was able to ascend to heavan. All of your religions are mind-numbingly retarded in their childish beliefs. A worldwide flood? Give me a f***ing break. And now you people think the world is gone to hell because there are people who don’t buy it. Well, the Muslims who don’t like me can kiss my ass, and so can the Jews and Christians. All your beliefs are f***ing retarded.

    Note: Dave, we don’t mind religious criticism, but we do mind the “F” bomb when inappropriate. I have cleaned up your potty mouth a little. Please, try to keep it clean in the future. Thank you. — Doc

  11. Akira Says:

    King David,

    I’d like to see some examples of Orthodox Christianity that are, as you say, “primitive, stupid, stultifying, barbaric, childish, dangerous, violent…given to a homocidal [sic? spelling? or does this mean you’re a sensitive queer?] fundamentalism.”

    Just one example of each attribute would be nice.

  12. Akira Says:

    Re: “but we do mind the “F” bomb when inappropriate.”

    I hope obscene references to The Pedophile Moham [“kiddie-fucker”, and so on] are appropriate, since he’s so disgusting, and yet so fawned over by our “betters” in government, the media, “academia”, etc., and needs to be exposed for the obscene filth he really was.

    [Note to Akira: I understand. That is appropriate usage. – Doc]

  13. Texas To The Max Says:

    If you need some examples of Christian excesses, study the Spanish Inquisition. Then read the transcripts of the trial of Joan of Arc, which do still exist. After that, if you need more, study the persecutions of Copernicus, Martin Luther and others. I know, it was the Catholic church, but the last time I looked, Catholics were Christians too.

  14. Texas,

    But, Christianity doesn’t tell you to kill your neighbors. Islam does.


  15. Ed Darrell Says:

    Joan of Arc was not a neighbor? Heck, Servetus was a friend of Calvin, beyond a neighbor.

    I think Tex to the Max is on to something: You should study the history of Christianity. It ain’t pretty.

    Killing neighbors? What about the St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre? What about Elizabeth I ordering the execution of her half-sister?

  16. Yes the history of Christianity is bloody but so is history period. The thing is there is nothing in Christianity that justifies the killings, while people may have used Christianity as an excuse for what they did the teachings of Christ do not excuse their actions and in fact condemn them. Islam on the other hand the teaching of Muhammad explicitly sate that you must make war of everyone who is not a Muslim and give religious sanction to war, rape and pedophilia, something that Christianity does not do. Yes there are some places in the bible that war was justified by god but these wars were gods commands and only those wars. Islam on the other hand justifies and expects war continually until all the unbelievers are killed or enslaved. There is a big difference. Cristian scripture did not condone the actions of Spanish Inquisition, it didn’t. while it was bad and sanctioned by the religious authorities of that day the bible did not. You need to separate the actions of people from the actually teaching of the religion, the teachings did not justify the actions of the Inquisition, while the Koran does justify brutality and war in the name of Allah.

  17. Akira Says:

    Ed Darrell is as confused as ever.

    Dr B: “Christianity doesn’t tell you to kill your neighbors.”

    Eddie: “What about blah blah blah blah blah?”

    Setting aside the fact that all the people Eddie mentioned are Frankish heretics and schismatics, and therefore are not part of Christian history, even if they were, can’t you read Eddie?

    “Christianity doesn’t tell you to kill your neighbors.”

    Get it?

    “Christianity doesn’t tell you to kill your neighbors.”

    Try reading it again. Put your bifocals on if necessary.

    Or better yet, show me somewhere in the New Testament where Christians are told to kill their neighbors.

  18. Akira Says:

    The Spanish Inquisition was an ecclesiastical tribunal started in 1478 by Catholic Monarchs Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile. It was intended to replace courts that were under papal control. The new body was under the direct control of the Spanish monarchy.

  19. Yitz Says:

    “I promise to do my duty in love and loyalty to the Führer and our flag.”

  20. sober pal Says:

    First of all I would like to say terrific blog! I had a
    quick question in which I’d like to ask if you don’t
    mind. I was interested to know how you center yourself and clear your mind before writing.
    I’ve had trouble clearing my thoughts in getting my ideas out there. I truly do enjoy writing however it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are lost just trying to figure out how to begin. Any recommendations or tips? Many thanks!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: