Study Finds that Children Reared by Gay Parents/Partners Have a Higher than Normal Incidence of Homosexuality

One word:  Duh!!!

Of course, the Lame Stream Media doesn’t want you to know anything about this:

FIRST-PERSON: Gay parents … gay children?
Kelly Boggs

ALEXANDRIA, La. (BP)–The results of a recently released study by a California psychologist are being all but ignored by the mainstream media. One possible motive for the lack of media attention is that psychologist Trayce L. Hansen’s research discovered that “children reared by openly homosexual parents are more likely to engage in homosexual behavior than children raised by others.”

According to Hansen, “Studies thus far find between 8% and 21% of homosexually parented children ultimately identify as non-heterosexual.” The most reliable studies indicate that approximately 2 percent of the population is non-heterosexual. Thus Hansen’s research has concluded, “[I]f these percentages continue to hold true, children of homosexuals have a 4 to 10 times greater likelihood of developing non-heterosexual preferences than other children.”

Hansen is a licensed psychologist with a clinic and forensic practice. She earned a Ph.D. from the California School of Professional Psychology located in San Diego.

While Hansen makes it clear that the research is not definitive, she indicates that it does suggest the conclusions concerning homosexual parenting are accurate.

It is worth noting that past studies suggesting possible “support” for a genetic or biological basis for homosexuality always indicated that the research was anything but definitive. That said, the media never questioned the veracity of the findings and, more times than not, reported them as factual. As a result, the theory that homosexuality is genetic is widely accepted as fact.

Hansen’s research seriously calls into question the theoretical conclusions of a genetic component being the cause for homosexuality.

If homosexual behavior was rooted in biology, one would expect the percentage of homosexuals in the general population, which is around 2 percent, to be reflected across the board in families. In other words, the incident of non-heterosexual children should be the same coming from a home with homosexual parents as it is in a home with heterosexual parents. According to Hansen’s finding, that is not the case.

Adding to the strength of Hansen’s conclusion is the criteria for which she conducted her research. Hansen explains that she “conducted a review of all the studies I could locate which assessed sexual preference in homosexually parented children.”

Her two main criteria for studies to include in her review were:

1) “[T]he authors of the study had to be pro-homosexual researchers” Why? Otherwise, she “was concerned that critics would simply disregard the results.”

2) She “only sought studies that utilized subjects 18 years of age or older, since many individuals don’t self-identify as non-heterosexual until after that age.” Unfortunately, she said, “few studies met the minimum 18-years-of-age criteria.” So, “in order to maximize the number of studies in my survey, I included studies with subjects as young as 14. Because of the inclusion of studies with such young subjects, the reported percentages of non-heterosexual children may be under-estimates.”

Hansen also found that pro-homosexual researchers that did discover “sexual preference differences between homosexuality and heterosexuality parented children, nonetheless declared in their research summaries that no differences were found.”

I find it unconscionable that a researcher would skew his or her findings in order to promote a sociopolitical agenda, especially when that research would affect the lives and futures of children. However, according to Hansen’s findings, that is exactly what has occurred.

Sadly, too many in the world of politics and media accept without question the false findings of pro-homosexuality researchers. As a result, some states allow homosexual couples to not only provide foster care but to also adopt children. In each and every case, the lives of children are being adversely affected.

“Findings from the best and most recent twin studies have found that homosexuality, unlike eye color, is not genetically–caused,” Hansen writes. “But there are a number of non-genetic mechanisms through which homosexuality could be transmitted from one generation to the next. Those mechanisms include role-modeling, social learning and differential reinforcement, as well as outright encouragement of non-heterosexuality by parents or others.”

Hansen’s research has only confirmed what is readily accepted as common sense in other areas of life. Studies indicate that children reared by parents that imbibe alcohol, smoke cigarettes and abuse their spouse are likely to follow their parents’ examples.

By ignoring Hansen’s findings the media is being derelict in its duty. Lawmakers, citizens, judges and policy makers all need to be aware that when they vote in favor of homosexual parenting they are skewing the odds that children will choose an unnatural and unhealthy lifestyle.

Explore posts in the same categories: Family, Psychology, statistics

9 Comments on “Study Finds that Children Reared by Gay Parents/Partners Have a Higher than Normal Incidence of Homosexuality”

  1. izlams not for me Says:

    Her post can be found here:

    Pro-Homosexual Researchers Conceal Findings:
    Children Raised by Openly Homosexual Parents More Likely to Engage in Homosexuality

    By Trayce Hansen, Ph.D.

  2. yonason Says:

    I’ll bet that’s not all they have a “higher incidence” of, and none of any good. It undermines the fabric of civilized society, and THAT is why the Torah calls it a perversion.

  3. sean Says:

    Im sorry but there is nothing unhealthy about being gay, there are ALOT higher percentages of straight people transmitting HIV than there are of gay people transmitting it. if you’re going to preach about how the “lame stream media” (i actually agree with that nickname) is avoiding or purposefully ignoring research and statistics then at least try not to be a hypocrite when you add comments that directly contradict current research. If you can’t do that then kindly shut your f****** homophobic mouth. Thank you.

    • Homophobic? LOL!!!

      I have had many, many good friends that are gay. After all, I DID live in the S.F. Bay area.

      Look at it this way: Homosexuality is a sexual “preference.” You either prefer the opposite sex, the same sex, or both. Whatever floats your boat. However, it IS a deviant sexual preference (or paraphilia) just as zoophilia, asphyxia, coprophila, etc. are all sexually deviant in that they are not “natural” or “normal” sexual acts.

      I also have friends who are committing adultery. Am I an “adultererophobe” just because it has been demonstrated that adultery is destructive to marriages and, consequently, the family? Am I an “adultererphobe” because I have no intention of letting them teach my child that adultery is a perfectly legitimate sexual preference?

      If you want to practice your adulterous ways or your paraphilia in the privacy of your own home, I have no qualms with that; like I said, whatever floats your boat. But, quit trying to force your perversion on MY children. Just as I don’t want the neighborhood pedophile to teach my child that pedophilia is a normal sexual preference, I don’t want any of my gay friends to teach my child that homosexuality is a normal sexual preference, because it is NOT! If my children grow up and decide that they want to be homosexuals, fine. So be it. Likewise, if they grow up and decide that they have this freaky fetish for dogs and horses, fine. So be it. But, at least they will NOT be under any false delusion that homosexuality and zoophilia are perfectly normal sexual preferences.

      Nor, do I allow my gay friends to BS me about a homosexual family unit being somehow healthier and and better than a heterosexual family unit when it comes to raising children. It is certainly not, and all honest studies have proven time and time again that a happily married mother and father provide the best psychological, as well as physiological, role models in child development. Men and Women—no matter how much you might wish it otherwise—are both physically and mentally (as in thought process) different. Because these unique qualities compliment each other, a child raised by a man and woman develops a much better and more rounded psychological and physical profile than a child raised by one parent or parents who are of the same sex. It’s child-rearing 101.

      Not to mention that the majority of male homosexuals have well over 100 sexual partners in their lifetime, with 43% of them reporting 500 or more sexual partners in their lifetime. (A. P. Bell and M. S. Weinberg, Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women, pp. 308, 309) Hardly a good role model for a child to be exposed to.

      And, do I even have to tell you that the average life-span of a homosexual relationship/marriage is only two to three years long, compared to heterosexual marriages in which 50% of those marriages last 20 years or more? Not to mention that homosexuals are more promiscuous than heterosexuals. Hardly a good, nurturing environment for a child to grow up in.

      In their book “Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them: Battered Gay Men and Domestic Violence,” Island and Letellier postulate that “the incidence of domestic violence among gay men is nearly double that in the heterosexual population.”

      The National Violence against Women Survey, sponsored by the National Institute of Justice, found that “same-sex cohabitants reported significantly more intimate partner violence than did opposite-sex cohabitants. Thirty-nine percent of the same-sex cohabitants reported being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked by a marital/cohabitating partner at some time in their lifetimes, compared to 21.7 percent of the opposite-sex cohabitants. Among men, the comparable figures are 23.1 percent and 7.4 percent.”

      Again, I say, “Hardly a good, nurturing environment for a child to grow up in.”

  4. islams not for me Says:


    Since you think you know plenty about research then next time add it. Or shut your pro homosexusal mouth…

    • nogayadoption Says:

      It is not natural for 2 men to raise a child. all you are doing is increasing the rate of homosexuality, Trayce Hanson a leading psycholigst in her feild has stated that research indicates 10% of children from gay parents turn out to be gay, as opposed to 2% of the general population of hcildren becoming gay.
      Encouraging gay adoption is also trumping the rights of chirstian adaoption agencies.
      This is positive discrimination towards gay couples and is basically not fair.

  5. tgusa Says:

    No doubt there are a few responsible fags out there and what they do in their bedroom is their own business. But we are not going to tolerate the other fags that have shown that they respect no one else’s thoughts or beliefs as the responsible ones say nothing. Maybe they would like it better living in most other countries where they would probably be dragged out of their house in the middle of the night and set on fire. That decision is fast approaching so choose carefully, your life very well depends on it.

    Fags have no value if either the muslims or socialists take power. Don’t believe me, do the research for yourself. The joke is on you and as usual you don’t even notice. Git yer head out of yer best friends arse before it is too late, fool.

  6. Carrie Says:

    What Dr. Hansen has found is in accordance with scripture as Proverbs 22:6 indicates that if you “train up a child in the way he should go, when he is old he will not depart from it.” This highlights the great influence that a child’s training has on their future choices.

    What Dr. Hansen may not be aware of is that her findings are consistent with the results of iniquity. Although it is not technically genetic, it starts with one generation passing it on to the next. This also explains why she believes her study would have yielded a higher incidence of non-heterosexual children if they were raised by openly homosexual parents as opposed to one of their parents eventually “coming out” and divorcing. This shows how iniquity has been passed to their children unknowingly and continues on down – not with everyone getting it, but having a higher incidence in that family line.

    So, in the end, having more same-sex couples with children just increase the family lines containing homosexual tendencies, as her research would indicate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: