Muslim Who Predicted 9/11 Says Nuclear Attack is Imminent

H/T – AZ_Conservative.

Is another 9/11 set to unfold?
By Lee Benson
Deseret News

Earlier this year, quite by happenstance, I read a book written by Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter James B. Stewart.

“Heart of a Soldier” tells the story of two men who, well before it happened, foretold not only of the terrorist attack of 9/11 but also the 1993 bombing in the World Trade Center parking garage that preceded it.

One of the men, Rick Rescorla, was chief of security for Morgan Stanley with an office in the World Trade Center. He died on 9/11, but not before he shepherded all but six of Morgan Stanley’s 2,700 employees to safety because of a well-prepared and well-executed evacuation plan. He’d have made it out, too, had he not gone back in the building looking for those six.

The other man, Daniel J. Hill, is still alive.

With another Sept. 11 approaching I wanted to talk to The Man Who Predicted 9/11.

Although the primary focus in Stewart’s book is on Rescorla — a bona fide hero for his actions on 9/11 — I found Hill to be an even more fascinating character.

It was Hill who converted to Islam as a young U.S. Army paratrooper stationed in Beirut in 1958. It was Hill who learned fluent Arabic. It was Hill who joined the Mujahedeen Freedom Fighters in Afghanistan and fought the Soviet invasion there in the 1980s. It was Hill who personally met Osama bin Laden. It was Hill who used information from Islamic extremists to warn Rescorla that terrorists would use the underground parking garage for a car bomb attack on the World Trade Center. It was Hill who asked the U.S. government to assist him in an assassination attempt on bin Laden in 1998 (the request was rejected). And it was Hill who warned the FBI just weeks before Sept. 11, 2001, that his Mideast contacts told him “something big” was about to happen in the United States, in New York, Washington, D.C., or Philadelphia — maybe all three.

Through the Internet I managed to contact Hill at his home in Florida. He’s 71 now. I asked him if his reputation as a terrorism prognosticator without parallel has changed his life much.

“Oh, that blew over pretty fast,” he said. “Most of the people even in my hometown don’t know any of that stuff.”

He didn’t want to talk about the past. He wanted to talk about the future.

The very near future.

The man who predicted 9/11 is worried that its sequel is imminent.

“Muslims that I talk to say things like, ‘America thinks they’re safe now. They’ve forgotten about 9/11. But watch, Daniel. Stay near your TV. It’s going to be bigger than 9/11,’ ” he said.

Hill said the next terrorist attack will involve suitcase nuclear bombs that will be detonated in small, low-flying two-seater private airplanes manned by men hanging onto the belief that, like the 9/11 hijackers, they are about to die as martyrs and enter paradise.

He is not alone in suggesting such a scenario. A 2007 book, “The Day of Islam,” spells out the details, as do any number of Internet sites about a plot called “American Hiroshima.”

The nukes, he said, will be detonated over New York, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Miami, Houston, Las Vegas and Los Angeles.

I asked Hill, “Why now?”

“Eight years from 1993 to 2001, eight years from that 9/11 to this 9/11,” he said. “Symbolism. They’re big on symbolism.”

“Ramadan started two weeks ago Saturday,” he said, referring to the Muslim holy month of fasting. “It always hits around Ramadan.”

Eight years ago, Hill predicted the attack would come on Oct. 16 — almost in the middle of that year’s Ramadan (the timing of Ramadan varies from year to year). He was about a month off.

“I don’t know the second, hour or day. I just know they have the means, will, motivation and desire to do it,” he said, noting that it’s believed that years ago the suitcase nukes, acquired from former USSR operatives, were smuggled into America across the Mexican border.

Hill said he has warned the FBI, the CIA and others in government. For the past two years, he’s sent out proposals for a book on the subject. All he’s gotten back are rejections.

“To most people, I am a deviant personality,” he said.

But there’s no arguing his credentials.

“I’m a Muslim,” he says. “I’m a special ops expert, I’m a terrorist and I’ve lived among Muslims. I fought the Russians with the same guys we’re now fighting in Afghanistan. I met Osama. I volunteered to assassinate him. I know (the enemy) so well because I’ve worked, slept and prayed alongside them for years. I’ve become one of them. I know their nature, I know their culture, I know how they think. I can quote the Koran like a Southern Baptist minister can quote the New Testament. I know these are people who do not tire, who do not quit. There are odds this won’t happen, but they aren’t big odds.”

“I hope you’re wrong,” I told him.

“Yeah. I hope so, too,” he said.

Explore posts in the same categories: muslim Intolerance, Muslims in The USA, Nuclear, Religion, security

44 Comments on “Muslim Who Predicted 9/11 Says Nuclear Attack is Imminent”

  1. Doc' Says:

    Just like with hurricanes and political shifts, it’s not a matter of IF….it’s just a matter of WHEN.

    “Hope for the best…Plan for the worst”.

    Doc’

    • az_conservative Says:

      Another attack is inevitable. Obama invites it with his submissive puppy routine, rolling over and peeing on himself before every tin-horn dictator he meets (at least he only bowed to the Saudi king, if throwing shoes is an insult in Islam, what would peeing on someone’s shoes be considered?)

    • catherine Says:

      ok he is wrong on the details. at least for now but the attack would proably happen in a poor neighborhood in Houston. An apartment complex trust me this one is’nt a bomb. they use sublimation. it already happened last november, and in december 4,

  2. az_conservative Says:

    I was so hoping someone would tell me this Hill guy is a fruitcake… but something tells me he isn’t.

    So, what happens if this comes to pass? What would the likely damage be (electrical grid, radioactive contamination, supply chain, social responses, etc)?


  3. Interesting, to say the least. However, the targeting seems off a bit. San Fransisco is a hot bed of that which Islam detest. I would think much more than, say, Houston, and it’s just as strategic.

    • tgusa Says:

      Patrick, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. San Francisco is only valuable to islamists as it is anything of strategic value has long since been run off or closed down up there. It would be my guess that after an attack such as this given SF’s stance towards anything as long as it is anti American that US citizens themselves would set the place ablaze.

      Islamists believe that homos will destroy a civilization through their words and deeds. I wonder where they got that idea?

    • catherine Says:

      houston apartment complex Shadowtree apts. check it out!

  4. az_conservative Says:

    LA=largest west coast port
    LV=sin city
    NY=heart of financial, large NE port
    DC=seat of government
    Houston=largest gulf coast port (OIL)
    Miami=Cuban refugees? (Islamic ties to Chavez, Castro)

  5. az_conservative Says:

    OK, I’m pretty alarmed here. http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=512

    Somebody PLEASE tell me I’m overreacting! This seems like a test run to see how officials would react? What pilot is going to continue on a heading with fighters firing flares?

    • Doc' Says:

      AZ,

      After doing a lil’ research, I doubt there’s really much to worry about in connection to this particular report. The info cited is vague at best and from a somewhat questionable source. Even the existence of the often mentioned “suitcase nukes” is still in question. While I do believe small tactical nukes do exist (both Russian & American made) and even that the possibilty exists that some may have been sold or stolen during Russia’s period of disaray and chaos, all such reports are speculative at best and no credible info has been presented to substantiate claims of the legendary “missing suitcase nukes” to date.

      IF terrorists have some of the legendary “suitcase nukes” I have no doubt they WILL use them against us, maybe even exactly as Hill describes, however, I think it’s far more likely that they have pursued development of small nuclear weapons or “dirty bombs” or biological weapons on their own for many years now. A.Q. Khan is probably far more likely to have provided nuclear “know how” to terrorists worldwide (Iran for example) than any desperate Russian military member trying to make a buck.

      The real concern about this entire situation is that we already KNOW terrorists intend to attack the US again, and we also know they may have access to nuclear technology/material and/or biological weapons. Add to that the alarming weakness of our border security and all of the ingredients for a large scale disaster are in place. IF nuclear weapons of any kind are used in any future attacks on the US, it will most likely be weapons designed and tailor built by the terrorists organizations themselves. It is far more likely and much easier for them to have aquired the raw materials required to build a small nuke rather than a complete weapon. It IS known as fact that certain small amounts of the necessary raw materials are indeed missing and we must presume that it has landed in the hands of our enemies.

      With all of that said, it is simply prudent and wise to assume that an eventual large scale attack (possibly nuclear) WILL take place sometime in the future. It could happen tomorrow, or in a few years but, it is highly likely to occur. This same conclusion has been expressed time and again by numerous security experts within our military and government, many an expert lies awake at night worrying about these very concerns.

      As I said before, “It’s not a matter of if…it’s simply a matter of when”.

      With that knowledge in mind, it is essential to “Hope for the best…but plan for the worst”.

      In reality, life after any nuclear attack on this country is unimaginable, the ramifications and difficulties involved in merely existing are almost insurmountable unless one has extensive resources and is willing to live in a post-nuclear attack world. Personally, it is beyond my ability to imagine the horrors involved. The terrorists KNOW this, and that’s exactly why they actively pursue our destruction in this fashion.

      Our best chance and hope is that we can PREVENT any such occurance from ever happening. This is exactly WHY we MUST take back control of our government and our country! We have NEVER been as vulnerable to attacks from our enemies as we are RIGHT NOW! “Kicking ‘Em ALL Out” is just the first step, once that is done, we MUST immediately place RESPONSIBLE and KNOWLEDGABLE representatives in every necessary office of the government! We can only hope that We The People can accomplish this vital and urgent task before our enemies exploit the pathetic cowards that currently fail to Protect Our Great Nation!

      Yes, GW made mistakes and increased the size of an already oversized government but, I believe he mostly did so as a direct response to the increasing security threats we faced post 9 / 11. As a result we have had NO terrorist attacks since.

      When we do take back our country from the lunatics that have stolen her from us, (And we soon will) we MUST learn from the mistakes and successes of the past so that we can be truly prepared and truly safe from the dangers that are sure to come!

      As I have so often said before…We are literally fighting for the very survival of Our Great Nation! May God Bless and Help Us All.

      Doc’


      • I think you’re right on, Doc.

        “Suitcase nukes” are all but physically impossible, owing to the minimum mass of nuclear material required for a chain reacton to occur, and to the amount of lead shielding required.

        But it is possible that suicidal fanactics might forgo the shielding (or much of it) in a shaheed operation.

        A dirty bomb might be a realistic option for them, but how does the mass required for a nuclear chain reaction compare to the amount required to make an “effective” dirty bomb?

        I don’t know exactly, but it’s worth more research.

        I’m also interested in whether the concerns about EMPs are well-founded.

        Very interesting to ponder.

        – pupista

      • az_conservative Says:

        Thanks, Doc’. I sure hope you’re right. Of course preventing it would be best but that requires healthy INTEL agencies focused on stopping it (not focused on getting a lawyer).

        We will take back our gov, but the time between now and then is what worries me…

        And…both borders are wide open. I shudder to think of what (and who) has been brought across. There’s also the Russian connection…not just materials, but weapons expertise.

  6. tgusa Says:

    Ok, I’m trying out my best leftard impression here. Obama and the democrats know about this and they are going to let it happen anyway! Some such thing about crisis and capitalizing on the aftermath of crisis. Yep, no doubt about it Obama lie’s and people will die.

    • az_conservative Says:

      SO does he get away with blaming Bush, shoving his agenda down our throats, imposing martial law and killing what’s left of the Republic? Or does his attempt to exploit the crisis end up in Civil War II?

      • tgusa Says:

        This part,
        Blaming Bush, shoving his agenda down our throats, imposing martial law and killing what’s left of the Republic.
        Leads to,
        Exploit the crisis end up in Civil War II. (I like to call it The Revolutionary Civil War)

        Thats my guess at least.

        • az_conservative Says:

          You are indeed a ray of sunshine in an otherwise dreary day 😉

          I was really hoping you’d come up with a more appealing alternative…

  7. Leatherneck Says:

    Ramadon ends this Friday, or Saturday for the moon god worshipers. It depends on when they see the moon. The fingernail of the god. Horns of the bull. You get the picture.

    Check some of the Mosques in the sand trap, and in New York. There may be some hate speech relating to the event, and some warriors for allah bugging out of the Great Satan.

    If anything does happen get your children from school ASAP. The warriors for allah love to murder, and rape young boys and girls. Just like Belson, Russia.

    ROPMA!

    • Ronin Says:

      No need to fear an attack in the US. The islamic community in the US is tiny compared to the rest of the populace and minions never attack when weak. They need the anti war crowd in the US to remain distracted and focused on the fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq. The minions know an attack on our homeland would crush all the anti war protesters arguments and led to an even bigger butt stomping than they face now. No, we are safe. Europe with a long history of cowardice, now they have a problem.

      • tgusa Says:

        I agree with what you say because it makes sense, the trouble is, muslims don’t. We have to ask ourselves a question, do muslims value our anti war types as much or more than they desire to rally their own?

        Personally, I believe you are right and we are safe from nukes for the time being. Besides, I think the islamists prefer to hit us with a gift that keeps on giving, goop.

        Russians built suitcase nukes that work? Hell, they couldn’t even fit three guys in a space capsule without leaving the space suits behind.

        • tgusa Says:

          They don’t make sense to us but to them it is perfect sense. Put yourself in the mind of an dedicated islamist. He believes that Allah is with him no matter what he does. He blows you up, its good. He doesn’t blow you up, its good too. He believes he is right and that he will win just as he has been told. Everything and everyone is a pawn in his world. He doesn’t give a second thought as to whether or not he has supporters anywhere, it’s Allah and only Allah that matters to him.

          • Ronin Says:

            I would have to disagree; it is all about personal power and notoriety with him. If he was a real believer and pleasing allah was his goal he would have martyred himself. He knows allah is fake. He keeps the allah myth going only because he likes to fool the minions into worshiping him as a great warrior priest. The sad thing is muslims are stupid enough to consider a coward that sends children to die a hero.

      • tgusa Says:

        Yes that too. The personal perks that he receives are very important. Really, without those there would only be the promise of something to come. Nice, to be sure, but not as nice as they have it now.

        I think we might be talking about two different islamists, one, like Chowdhury is not afraid to tell the truth, and he probably believes he will be martyred. The other, a paper tiger, has not the courage, he lurks in the shadows waiting to claim the remains.

      • mel Says:

        I would beg to differ. They don’t need any anti-war rhetoric from the public, they have it from the White House, and will continue to have it even if the unthinkable happens. Remember, Obama is a Muslim sympathizer. He is proving this again and again. How many of you on 9/10/2001 would have believed someone who told you that passenger planes would be hijacked and flown into both buildings of the World Trade Center and that those buildings would collapse? Now we have arrived at that point once again unfortunately, only in a worse scenario.

        • tgusa Says:

          [This comment was accidentally posted in the wrong comments section. I have deleted the redundant text to avoid confusion. — Dr. Bulldog]

          Now if you had told me in 79 that there was a good chance the USSR might launch a nuke attack against us I and most others would have said, Yeah? You think thats news?

          • tgusa Says:

            Opps, above post should read,

            You are absolutely right and if anyone had told me in 89 that in twenty years I would be being searched at the Airport I wouldn’t have believed that either. The truth is living with muslims requires sacrifice, our politicians, as we can see, understand this. The question is, how much are they willing to make us sacrifice in order for them to continue with their assumptions?

            Now if you had told me in 79 that the USSR might launch a nuke attack against us I and most others would have said, Yeah? You think thats news?

  8. tgusa Says:

    And what is even more troubling to me, the companies that trade with the muslims. These companies trade with them and eventually muslims start saying , we don’t like this or that about your country or people change it ort else. IMHO any company that trades with muslims should get all they are in for. No we are not going to do away with this or that just so they can make a buck. We can elect a new guvmint, not so with these greedy companies.

  9. Gonzo Says:

    My personal, psychic prediction for another terrorist attack on U.S. soil is Thursday morning, 11/12/09. I struggled between this date and 11/11/09 — which seems to me to be a weird way to encode a symbolic date for a second 9/11 — as it contains the number 11 twice, along with a nine.

    BTW — I had successfully predicted the original terrorist attacks of 9/11. Furthermore, this is not just some crazy, anecdotal story told by a wild-eyed nutjob. My prediction, or words of prophecy, if you will, were recorded and date stamped. They were disguised as a fictional TV show, and broadcast over the airwaves six months BEFORE the 9/11 shit hit the fan. I am refering to the now famous pilot episode of The Lone Gunmen, first aired on March 4th, 2001. I dare call it prophecy because I spoke of these things 27 years BEFORE they occurred, way back when I wasn’t even a mature adult — before I was college educated or politically biased.

    The plot of this show includes several accurate details which corresponded with the actual, historical event.

    1) A hijacked airplane (only one) being flown into The World Trade Center in New York, as a poor man’s guided missal. (In the show, the attack was stopped by a hacker on the ground, who took over the plane via remote control)

    2) The plot also suggests governmental complicity. On the surface the attack was made to look like it was done by Islamic Terrorists, but in reality it was done by the U.S. Military/Industrial Complex, in order to justify conquering the oil fields in the Middle East in retaliation. Such a plan is referred to as a ‘false flag operation’. The Boston Tea Party was also an act of terrorism, by colonial citizens against the British Empire — where the perpetrators dressed up as Indians. I used just this analogy in explaining my prophecy in the year 1974.

    For those of you here who refuse to even listen to the 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists, I must point out that the 9/11 Commission Report cannot explain why Building Seven collapsed into it’s own footprint. It was not on fire, nor was it hit by an airplane. So what… it spontaneously collapsed? A 47 story, steel structured building fell straight down.

    For parallels to a governmental whitewash, simply go back and look at The Warren Report, regarding the Kennedy Assassination. Now that many of the long disputed facts are in, and many of those involved have admitted the report was a whitewash.

    Do NOT just look at the right-wing analysis, either. Try reading both sides of a controversial argument before coming to a conclusion. Stop to consider points that your side refuses to acknowledge… Also try avoiding listening to right-wing radio talk show hosts who reduce complex arguments down to simple bullet points of propaganda for those too dim-witted to come to their own conclusions.

    • Ronin Says:

      The most investigated terror attack in history. Investigated by haters and non-haters. The guilty have confessed. Connections to them found, witnesses statements and scientific evidence all in but you alone have the right answer. Get a grip.

      BTW, just for fun explain to all us dummies how the military industrial complex was talked into attacking their own headquarters.

      Where all the stolen oil went.

      Why none of the hundreds of thousands of workers and visitors to the towers spoke out about the hundreds of dump trucks full of explosives it would have taken to drop just one.

      Why none of the three businesses that could have dropped it, agreed to do it.

      Where the thousands of miles of wire needed to activate the explosives went and why no trace of it remains.

      Why a psychic such as yourself did not realize I would think you to be only a fool.

      I have more questions but those will do for now.

      • pupista Says:

        But Ronin! It’s more fun to believe the other way!!! *sniff!*

      • tgusa Says:

        Not to mention that to implode a building weeks and weeks are put in removing every bit of material that they can, doors and windows, drywall and carpet, furniture and baby toys and on and on, all but the structural skeleton, concrete steel and rebar. Once that monumental chore is complete, well, its on to the drilling of holes and weakening of stress points and yes finally the dump trucks of explosive supplies.

        • Ronin Says:

          I bet he believes in global warming too.

        • az_conservative Says:

          The only somewhat physically plausible scenario I’ve heard is thermite, but I don’t know how plausible that even is. Supposedly there were people working in the towers before the 11th, and the CIA or someone had offices and a vault in WTC7…Have you heard that as a theory for how the WTC 1, 2 & 7 towers were brought down? What do you think?

          Still seems pretty shaky to me…of the hundreds of people who would know of it, NOT ONE has spoken out? OTH, all THREE dropped into their own footprints? That does seem strange.

  10. islams not for me Says:

    So gonzo is psychic but not promoting thier own new age website or religion?

    Makes me wonder if Ms Piggy will convert or pervert to islam….

  11. islams not for me Says:

    So far all predictions have come to nothing. No attack by allahs ‘slaves’ means he is unable to live up to the hype of it.

  12. Rock Says:

    Only the credible threat of an automatic ‘SAMSON OPTION’ targeting EVERY major Islamic holy site will prevent this. These scum think they are winning. We have to give them pause to reconsider. If we don’t put the word out that any nuke over U.S. soil detonated in the name of Islam will result in the AUTOMATIC and GUARANTEED destruction of the Islamic World, then we’ve already lost, and this scenario is inevitable, imho.

    • Big Frank Says:

      Sadly you are correct, most of our political class lack the balls to even suggest any kind of action.

  13. Rock Says:

    http://banislamnow.com/

    This has to happen or we lose.


  14. […] Nuclear Jihad NU2, NU3, NU4, NU5, NU6, NU7, NU8, NU9, NU10,NU11, NU12, NU13, NU14, NU15, NU16 […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: