Dr. Bulldog and Ronin Now a “Radical Blog!”

*Sniffle*  I’m just so…so…so…devastated. *Sniffle*

ROFLMAO!  This is just too funny!  I had to step away from the computer for a while to keep from cracking a rib while LMAO!

11th District GOP candidate wants to end Muslim immigration to U.S.

Trish Choate Standard-Times Washington Bureau
Posted September 28, 2009 – gosanangelo

SAN ANGELO, Texas — WASHINGTON — A hopeful for San Angelo’s congressional seat wants no more Muslim immigration to America.

But Canyon Clowdus doesn’t stop at the stance he outlined to radical blog “Dr. Bulldog and Ronin,” which endorsed him for 11th Congressional District representative.

[These Libtards in the media really crack me up!  Just because a website is a Conservative Right-Wing website which doesn’t fit into the mindset of a Libtard or espouse their kool-aid drinking rhetoric, we are suddenly labeled as a “radical blog!”  LOL!]

“It’s not just them,” the conservative Republican told a reporter Sunday night. “They need to check all immigrants. They used to assimilate.”

Instead, immigrants retain their beliefs, hurting America, Clowdus, a Marble Falls businessman, said.


Clowdus wants to halt Muslim immigration to stop what the blog termed a “stealth Jihad” and “creeping sharia” to replace the Constitution with Islamic religious law.

[Obviously, Trish Choate doesn’t even know the origin of those terms.  It’s sad, really.  Of course, I’m not the one who created those terms, nor am I the one who originally said:

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant,” and, “The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”

Nope, that wasn’t me nor was it Ronin.  That was the founder of CAIR, Omar Ahmed.  You remember CAIR, right?  The unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation Terrorism case and the ones who want to prosecute passengers who report suspicious passengers on planes?   The ones who even the FBI had to back away from.  Yeah, Ibrahim Hooper is the talking propaganda head, now (and darling of the Lame Stream Media who fatuously suck down every drop of his Islamaganda).  But, back in the day, Omar Ahmed was “The Man.”

Of course, Ahmed now denies having said what he said (BTW – it only took him about 8 years before he started denying that he had made those comments), but the reporter, Lisa Gardiner, is a solid reporter and is 100 percent sure that she heard Ahmed correctly and accurately reported what he had said.

So, let’s break Ahmed’s statement down a little, shall we?:

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant.”

In other words, one of Islam’s goals in America is domination of ALL other religions.  Sounds pretty bigoted to me and highly unconstitutional, as well…

“The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America.”

In other words, The Qur’an and Islamic law (which comes from the Qur’an and Hadiths) should be the highest authority in America, even higher than the U.S. Constitution.  Yup, that pretty much sums up the goal of Islam in America.

“and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”

Uhm, wouldn’t the implementation of that go contrary to the 1st Amendment?  You know, the part the Lame Stream Media wishes wasn’t included before their iconic Free Speech clause:  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof […]”

Of course, Ibrahim Hooper has his own way of putting it:

“I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.  But I’m not going to do anything violent to promote that.  I’m going to do it through education” ~ Ibrahim Hooper, (CAIR).

Gee, I’m so glad Hooper is a “moderate” Muslim and wants to stealthily brainwash my children into letting Islam take over the United States Government.  Hence, the term “stealth jihad.”

Not only that, but even Ibrahim Hooper admits that if Muslims become sufficient in number, they WILL replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic Law:

“In 2003 Hooper stated that if Muslims ever become a majority in the United States, they will likely seek to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic law, which they deem superior to man-made law.” – Discover the Networks

(Rather than go on and on about CAIR, I suggest you all click on the Discover the Networks link and start discovering for yourselves).

Of course, I couldn’t help but notice that no “moderate” Muslims were chastising their fellow compatriots who were holding up the following signs at two different protests in New York City back in February of 2006:

Protest in New York City, February 1, 2006 -  Note the black flag of Islam, the battle-flag of jihad, flying over the White House on the placard at left.

Protest in New York City, February 1, 2006 - Note the black flag of Islam, the battle-flag of jihad, flying over the White House on the placard at left.

February 17, 2006 - At the New York cartoon protest rally.  Again, note the Black Flag of Islamic Jihad flying over the White House!

February 17, 2006 - At the New York cartoon protest rally. Again, note the Black Flag of Islamic Jihad flying over the White House!

So, it isn’t Ronin or myself who say that Islam is here in the United States to dominate, it is the “moderate” (by Lame Stream Media standards) Muslims.  We are merely reporting what they are saying.  So, if Trish Choate has a problem with that and feels that we are “radicals” for reporting on such events, then she, through her fifth column complacency and willfully selective Libtard blindness, supports the overthrowing of the United States and its Constitution.  After all, freedom isn’t awarded to the complacent and, most assuredly, cannot be long maintained if one willfully ignores the enemy within.]

A civil rights advocate said he reads the blog and is disappointed a congressional candidate is lending his credibility to efforts to divide Americans instead of bring them together.

[Communist codeword alert!:   “Civil Rights Advocate.”

Also, I am disappointed that a “civil rights advocate” is lending his credibility to efforts on the part of a repressive religion like Islam to divide Americans instead of bringing them together.  Think about it; Islam is a barbaric, male-chauvinist cult that seeks to separate the sexes, separate the Muslims from the infidels (why else do you think so many Muslims come here to the United States and immediately set up “Islamic Communities” away from others? ) , remove ALL homosexuals, etc., etc.  The list goes on and on, ad nauseam.  This is certainly NOT what Martin Luther King was trying to do during the civil rights movement!  Islam is the exact opposite of the civil rights movement—it (Islam) strives to divide and subjugate, not unite and equalize.

Uhm, is this where I should mention to the civil rights advocate, Eric Ward, that I’m part black?  And, part Indian?  Of course, we made the terrible mistake of ignoring all those “white men” who kept coming to America on those “floating islands.”  Heck, we thought they were just here to hang out with us and have a good time.    Willful blindness, my friend…]

The blog has pushed the wrong-headed idea that there’s a huge clash of civilizations between Christianity and Islam, said Eric Ward of the Chicago-based Center for New Community, a faith-based organization including Christians, Jews and Muslims.

[A commie organization from Our Dark Overlord’s home town!  Gee, what a surprise…  The Chicago Democratic Socialists of America just loves them—although I noticed that the DSA now has a disclaimer at the top of their page to distance themselves from controversy.  Ah, yes…it reminds me of when the Chicago DSA scrubbed their website clean of any incriminating evidence linking them with Obama.  But, I digressed.  For lots of fun, our buddy at VDARE.com, Peter Gadiel (whose 23-year-old son, James, was killed by Muhammadans on 9/11), has encountered Eric Ward’s speciousness in the past.  CLICK HERE to read his encounter with Eric the talking headcase.]

“The truth of the matter is that the only clash that’s going on is amongst extremist elements in Christianity and Islam,” Ward said.

[What does Christianity have to do with it, you bigot!  Ronin is an Atheist.  He gets just as many, if not more, death threats from the Islamic community as I do.  So, if “the truth of the matter” is that this is only a clash between “extremist elements” in Christianity and Islam, then why are the Islamists so pissed off at him, to the point of actually threatening to kill him, an Atheist, eh?  You see, it’s not about Christians, Jews, or Atheists.  It’s about a cult that was started by a murderous pedophile who commanded his followers to kill the infidels.   It doesn’t matter if you are a Christian or not.  If you oppose Islam, the un-Holy Qur’an and its associated Hadiths give Muslims permission to kill you.]

Neither Congressman Mike Conaway nor a second challenger, Chris Younts, shared Clowdus’ views on Muslim immigration.

[No surprise there! ]

“Congressman Conaway is a strong proponent of immigration reform,” Conaway campaign spokesman Richard Hudson said. “But he does not have an immigration policy based on religion.”

[Yeah, but he DID vote for Bush’s TARP—which I’m pretty sure funnels money to illegal aliens (think ACORN, my friends). ]

San Angelo businessman Younts opposes illegal immigration but “believes that any law abiding citizen of another country should be allowed to immigrate to the United States as long as they abide by our immigration policies and honor our Constitution,” Younts campaign spokesman Ken Burton said.

[Yup, that’s pretty much my own personal philosophy—as long as they abide by our immigration policies and honor our Constitution (yeah, I know, it’s “radical” ).  But, I must admit that I’ve been pretty hard pressed to find a Muslim who actually puts the U.S. Constitution above Islamic law.    The only Muslim I know who does that is our long-time Muslim buddy, Muslims Against Sharia (MASHA) who Trish Choate and Eric Ward probably think must be another one of them “radical” bloggers.  LOL!]

UPDATE: For even more side-splitting fun, see the much longer version of this article by CLICKING HERE.  Notice that Ibrahim “I’m going to do it through education” Mr. Hooper of CAIR is now in on the act!

Too funny—especially since Mr. Hooper admits in the article that Islam (in his little head) is above the U.S. Constitution—as in the Freedom of Speech clause:

[…] CAIR asks mainstream leaders to challenge anti-Muslim talk if they hear it because silence equals consent or unspoken approval, Hooper said.

“That’s why it’s the responsibility of people of goodwill in our society and particularly leaders in our society to challenge this kind of hate-filled bigoted rhetoric when it’s used anywhere in our society,” Hooper said. […]

See?  Evidently, Mr. Hooper thinks that Islam is above criticism and should get some sort of a free pass from the Free Speech clause in the Bill of Rights.  Let me just state for the record, “NO RELIGION IS ABOVE CRITICISM!”

In fact, I seem to recall that Ibrahim Hooper appears to be a little confused about the current laws of the United States when the Associated Press reported back in August of 2007:

CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper “said that a minority of Muslims take second wives, and that Islamic scholars would differ on whether one could do so while living in the United States.”

Which begs the question:  How large of a minority of Muslims have taken on second wives in the United States and why is it that these “Islamic scholars” are unable to take into account the fact that polygamy is illegal according to the laws of the United States?  Seems pretty cut and dry to me—polygamy is illegal in the United States!  But, on the other hand, if these Islamic scholars don’t believe in the laws of the United States superseding Islamic law, then I can certainly can understand why they would fall into such confusion.

But, be that as it may, I will give Mr. Hooper props for staying away from the race card, since Islam is NOT a race, it’s a cult founded by a murdering profligate warlord who told his followers (among other immoral things) it’s okay to kill, rape, and steal.  If telling the truth about Islam is considered “hate-filled bigoted rhetoric” by Mr. Hooper’s small mind, then so be it.

Obviously, he is in denial of Muhammad’s own hate-filled bigoted rhetoric:

“Surely those who disbelieve [Muhammad’s message of Islam] from among the followers of the Book [Christians] and the polytheists shall be in the fire of hell, abiding therein; they are the worst of men.” – Qur’an 98:6

As for me, I don’t hate Muslims—sure, I think they’re all pretty stupid for following such an obviously false prophet and I really feel sorry for them, but I don’t hate them—I hate all ideologies which enslave the masses and destroy freedoms.  Islam just happens to be one such ideology.  If that makes me a “radical”  in the eyes of the ignorant, then so be it!

Besides, “radical blog” has such a nice, hippie Lefturd feel to it.   It just cracks me up everytime I hear it!   Kind of like the pot trying to call the stainless steel kettle black.

Explore posts in the same categories: ACLU, anti dhimmitude, Anti-Americanism, bloggers, CAIR, Communism, Creeping Sharia, dhimmitude, Education, immigration, Indoctrination, Interview, know your enemy, Liberals, Media Bias, Multiculturalism, Muslim Honor, muslim Intolerance, Muslim whining, Muslims in The USA, politics, Sharia, Stealth Jihad

16 Comments on “Dr. Bulldog and Ronin Now a “Radical Blog!””

  1. tgusa Says:

    Ask them when was the last time someone said Jesus is great before they set off to murder people. Ask him where the video tapes are of Christians stating I’m doing this for Jesus. The article does nothing but criticize based on their assumptions. Assumptions made from their cozy little getaway in Chicago that is not backed up worldwide. Will muslims integrate? Well, what we see today are training camps in the USA, lone jihadists committing murder, small groups plotting destruction, 9 out of the last ten jihadists arrested were American citizens. I would like to see them take their merry band on the road, to start proselytizing in Dearborn or Jersey see what happens then.

    Also, I would like an explanation of how we are going to be capped and traded and still have any immigration. We already use too much, more people is really not in line with the policies that are being put forward.

    And one last thing, bill Ayres, what is he, a professor in Chicago who has had a hand in our kids educations? A guy who wanted to blow you or me up as we made a withdrawal or danced at a military post social. A democrat in good standing and probably an acquaintance of these people. And they have problems with this blog? Bwaahahahaha.

  2. Doc' Says:

    As usual, our good friend Dr. Bulldog has shown the bright light of truth into the darkness of ignorance and political “correctness” that plagues the
    lame stream media.

    Even when they attack him personally, Dr. Bulldog rises above their petty insults and then with great ease, totally obliterates their amateurish attempts to distort the facts. Much to their dismay, the likes of Trish Choate, Ibrihim Hooper and Eric Ward will never see the day that they can even begin to present well written factual statements, muchless rebuttals, worthy of the Respect and Trust that Dr. Bulldog has repeatedly earned from his fans and peers around the world. Many so-called “Professional Journalists” can only dream of obtaining the tremendous skills, insight and loyal readership that Dr. Bulldog has in abundance.

    Bravo Sir! Well Done!

    With Great Respect and Admiration,

  3. Ronin Says:

    I guess we could look at this like there is no bad publicity. While the attempt was obviously to smear Canyon, this will instead bring the curious to our site and his own. Some will agree with him and us a few will not. No matter, all will stop and think. In the end that will encourage many to do a little research and decide for themselves if hanging out with us radicals is worse than hanging out with the criminals we now have in office. Our stances on politics, immigration, human rights and other important issues have always been clearly stated, non-changing and do not wavier. Agree with us or not, site visitors seeking to discredit Canyon by branding us, his friends and supporters as “radicals” will really force both sides to play a game of who do they associate with and why, who is the most consistent, who has no problems with hard topics. Canyon, could not buy better publicity than this.

    While I do support Canyon, I wanted to remind everyone I was for voting out the incumbents long before we met and endorsed Canyon. He is the type of person we need to replace them. I could care less about right or left wing, I want a representative that is honest on their views and remembers they represent the voters not themselves or their friends.

    In addition, I want to point out that Doctor Bulldog is the radical; I am just a blogger from Florida (luv ya Doc).

    • PB-in-AL Says:

      “…and decide for themselves if hanging out with us radicals is worse than hanging out with the criminals we now have in office.”

      Count me in with you guys for sure! I’ve never been radical before….gee it feels almost scandalous.

      Yeah, whatever. Vote them all out, we need a house cleaning of massive proportion. We can only hope that folks of Mr. Clowdus’ bent are the replacements. We need real people, who know that they represent the folks that voted for them; not lifetime politicians that opt for re-election expedience over substance, truth, or doing what’s right.

    • tgusa Says:

      Bulldog is the radical? You might want to rethimk that, otherwise you wont get to go to Bermuda with the rest of us.

  4. Mab Says:

    Thank you God for radical blogs.



  5. islams not for me Says:

    Since I can be accused as being a ‘radical’ blogger as well…

    As long as muslims are not willing to deal with the bad elements in thier culture, system they desirve to be criticized and to be put on notice we dont want to be dhimmis under thier system.

  6. CavMom Says:

    The left is big on tossing out names. Wear it as a badge of honor.

  7. Bob Says:

    Ain’t nobody here ‘cept us religion-and-gun-clinging right-wing, radical raaaycists!

  8. Weaver Says:

    Does this mean I get to be an honorary radical?


  9. az_conservative Says:

    Congrats! I hope this ups the site traffic 100 fold. The more people who find out the truth, the better.

  10. heroyalwhyness Says:

    Ahh, it was ever so satisfying (and humorous) to read Dr. Bulldog’s response to this bit of pathetically gullible ‘journalism’ by Trish [In]Choate .


    As I read through this post, I couldn’t help but wonder how different things would be today, had we, as a nation, not been so ignorant of Islam. Had just a fragment of our population who, today, are aware of the duplicitous nature of Islamic teachings and fully comprehend the inherent danger in it’s foundational standard of subjugation: dar-al-islam vs. towards dar-al-harb – been ready @ 9/11 to confront the expanding beast created as an unholy alliance between the left/islam which lulls this vast nation back to slumber. How different could things be . . .sigh.

    Above, Dr. Bulldog mentions ” Yup, that’s pretty much my own personal philosophy—as long as they abide by our immigration policies and honor our Constitution (yeah, I know, it’s “radical” ). ”

    Abide by our immigration policies? They? [insert a hearty dose of chuckles here]

    This weekend, our first ‘black’ president, Bill, went on record with the press to aleve panicking leftist jitters towards the ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ saying:
    “. . .”You bet. Sure it is. It’s not as strong as it was because America has changed demographically. . .”

    The demographic shift is only possible because of treasonous behavior by political whores. Unenforced immigration law, open borders, blanket amnesty with bonus govt. health care IS official politically motivated demographic policy/warfare, now with the addtion of Islamic interests inserted in a neighborhood near you.

  11. Darryl Warren Says:

    Hey what part of you is Indian and what part of you is black? Left foot? Right hand? What does the ethnicity or race of your ancestors have to do with what Eric Ward said about your website? You’re starting to sound like one of the special ethnic interets groups you rail about. Sad.

    • “What does the ethnicity or race of your ancestors have to do with what Eric Ward said about your website?”

      From the article: “A civil rights advocate said he reads the blog and is disappointed a congressional candidate is lending his credibility to efforts to divide Americans instead of bring them together.”

      Uhm, just what part of that did you miss? Just in case you can’t figure it out on your own, I have highlighted it for you in bold.

      The wannabe report, Trish Choate tried to make this into a Civil Rights issue by dragging “civil rights advocate” Eric Ward into the picture. It was she, not I, who dragged civil rights into the picture, forcing a response on my part. Duh! If you can’t figure that out, then I can’t help you.

      BTW – Sure, I’m a hodgepodge of different races of people, but so are MOST Americans. While I am not as dark-skinned as some of my wonderful and beautiful nieces and nephews, I’m still part black. Dinosaurs like Eric Ward are just idiots still living in the past trying to fan the dying embers of racism in order to gain favoritism for a race of people. That IS racism! Unfortunately, gullible Libtard wannabe reporters, like Trish Choate, continue to add fuel to the fire every time they go to the archaic “Civil Rights” flesh peddlers.

      In fact, it would appear that the ONLY people NOT interviewed for this article was Ronin and myself. That’s quite interesting, considering that a large portion of the article was an attack on us. Kind of one-sided, don’t you think? It’s not like Trish Choate couldn’t email us or something, as our email addresses are listed on the Contact page.

      Furthermore, you say that I rail against “special ethnic interets [sic] groups.” Please, enlighten me. I am unaware of any ethnic groups in particular.

      Do you mean Mohammedans? A religion is not an ethnicity, it’s an ideology.

      Do you mean illegal aliens? Illegal aliens are not an ethnicity, they are criminals from varied countries.

      Do you mean my hatred of libtards? Libtards are not an ethnicity, they are an ideology.

      Perhaps you are searching for another word other than “racist.” What about “bigot?” Am I bigot? Well, any so called “religion” that justifies the killing of “infidels” and follows the teachings of a mass-murdering, cross-dressing, lying, thieving, pedophile is worthy of criticism. In fact, there is no religion above criticism when it is used to justify profligateness. If that makes me a bigot in someone’s moronic libtard book, then so be it. I know myself. Ultimately, that is all that matters; not your opinion and certainly not the tendentious opinion of a commie-loving “civil rights advocate.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: