Inbreeding Muslims ‘putting children at risk of birth defects

Thanks to D. Blade for sending this is. The article falls flat on this issue as it does not address the contributing factors, child brides, forced marriages, incest or rape. Child abuse in every islamic society is a problem, their are few voices willing to speak out against it and few of those that do have a sizeable audience.

Want to know what generations of inbreeding will do to a family-just look at Pakistan.

By Rhianna King, 21 mar 10, Daily Mail
A rise in the number of marriages between cousins in Britain has prompted calls for a crackdown on the practice amid warnings it is putting children’s health at risk.

Crossbench peer Baroness Deech has called for a ‘vigorous’ public campaign to deter marriages between family members, which is common in Muslim and immigrant communities.

Her comments come as figures show up to 75 per cent of British Pakistanis in some areas are married to first cousins.

In a speech to be made next week, obtained by The Times, the leading family lawyer will warn that such marriages can be a barrier to the integration of minority communities and increases the risk of birth defects in children.
-You see the problem but not the cost. Imagine what this costs tax payers in education, medical care, therapy etc. Like all things islam the problems only grow as a closer look is taken.

She is also expected to call for testing for genetic defects when marriages between family members are arranged and for a register of people carrying genetic diseases to be set up in order for two carriers not to be introduced.

She said such a scheme could be possible in Bradford, which has the UK’s highest population of Pakistanis.

Up to three-quarters of Pakistanis in Bradford are married to their first cousins.

The trend is also evident in Birmingham, where figures show that one in ten of all children born to first cousins died in childhood or suffered from a serious genetic disorder.
-Believing the BS in the koran could also qualify as a “serious genetic disorder” but why quibble?

British Pakistanis, half of whom marry a first cousin, are 13 times more likely to produce children with genetic disorders than the general population, according to Government-sponsored research.

Although British Pakistanis account for three per cent of the births in this country, they are responsible for 33 per cent of the 15 to 20,000 children born each year with genetic defects.

Baroness Deech will also suggest that married first cousins use in-vitro fertilisation so that embryos can be tested for recessive diseases.

‘Human right and religious and cultural practices are respected not by banning cousin marriage,’ she will argue.
-Religious and cultural practices should never be an excuse to put children at risk. If they cannot live with western laws they should leave. Any politician stupid enough to support this should be replaced with someone with a brain.

‘But those involved must be made aware of the consequences.’

In next week’s speech, she will say that marriages between cousins is on the rise and the practice is ‘at odds with freedom of choice, romantic love and integration.’

But she said the practice was continuing because of financial reasons – either to settle debts or provide financial support for relatives abroad; helping relatives to migrate to Britain or wanting to provide a ‘ready-made’ family for an immigrant spouse.

Lady Deech will also call for an education campaign to warn of the health risks of such marriages, but will stop short of urging a ban.

‘There is no reason, one could argue, why there should not be a campaign to highlight the risks and preventative measures, every bit as vigorous as those centring on smoking, obesity and Aids

‘Where marriages are arranged, it is possible to test for carrier status and record with results, without stigmatising individuals.’

Her speech is set to reignite a debate from five years ago when Ann Cryer, the Labour MP for Keighley in Yorkshire, said cousin marriages were medieval and called for them to be stopped.

Ms Cryer encouraged discussion the issue this week.

‘We have been told to be careful, as discussing it could cause deep offence. Blow that, it does not matter. If people wish to be offended, they will be offended.’

Two years ago Minister Phil Woolas provoked a furore by warning of the health risks of cousin marriages among British Pakistanis.

He claimed the practice was sending the number of birth defects among children in these communities soaring.

His comments prompted Gordon Brown’s spokesman to state that the issue was not one for ministers to comment on.
-Coward, he couldn’t support the laws of his own country, what a disgrace.

Instead, he said, it should be addressed by members of the local community and scientific experts.

Mr Woolas insisted that he had a duty to raise the subject of cousin marriage – which is legal in the UK – based on cultural and not religious grounds.

Muslim Council of Britain spokesman Inyat Bunglawala welcomed Lady Deech’s comments.

He said cousin marriage was popular even though Islamic teaching encouraged wedlock outside the immediate family.

‘Certainly education has an important role to play in this area. There are clear dangers to marrying a close relative, which need to be better understood.’

Lady Deech’s speech is the latest in a series of family law lectures she has given under the auspices of Gresham College.

In a speech last week she said English law no longer had a clear concept of marriage.

She said the traditional Christian image of a lifelong union of man and woman is no longer accurate because of the changing nature of relationships and the introduction of legal rights for same-sex couples.

Lady Deech said she believes that human rights law may soon rule that it is discriminatory to ban homosexuals from marrying in the same way that heterosexual couples do.

But she added that some differences between civil partnerships and marriages should be preserved, and criticised recent Labour laws that allow same-sex couples to be named on birth certificates with no mention of a father.
-Notice the not so subtle attempt at moral equivalency found throughout the article. No such deception here. Muslim cult members should be called out on all the sick twisted problems that come from following the examples set by a seventh century pedophile. No break here minions, every person that claims the title of muslim is at least guilty of passive support for these and other crimes. Passive support is still support.

Explore posts in the same categories: British Muslims, cover-up, criminal activity, Muslim on Muslim Violence

27 Comments on “Inbreeding Muslims ‘putting children at risk of birth defects”

  1. Mullah Lodabullah Says:

    I think a lot of the healthy offspring post in here – “u r racest and no nothin wot da koran say bout wot ya rite. get educated n lern b4 postin stuff wot da no nothin bout” (or something like that).

  2. Mullah Lodabullah Says:

    We are family!
    I’ve got all my cousins with me!

  3. tgusa Says:

    Not to beat a dead ugly horse but Hollywood has always used the Afghan Pakistan region as the bullpen, the go to guys when they needed weirdos for a movie. The movie, Freaks, from the thirties has two Afghan girls in it. No make-up needed.

  4. islams not for me Says:

    Reminds me of a line from the vidoe game “Evil Dead”…

    “Inbred and undead”….

    Gee and I thuoght that this type of things was considered ‘haram’ by the profit muhammad.

  5. Bob Says:

    I’m confused.
    I thought producing muslims REQUIRED inbreeding.
    ?

  6. ciccio Says:

    What a lovely, cheerful article. Right now, one in ten either dies or is a retard. When inbreds marry inbreds that proportion will double every generation. The Pakistani community which is now 3rd generation British is a perfect example. When they first arrived 50 years ago they were uneducated but willing labour. Coming from a 3rd world country without public health care, at home they paid Darwin’s price for inbreeding, the worst of them died off like flies. The British NHS is keeping them alive, to wit only one in five Pakistani/Bangladeshi boys manages to get a decent pass in high school. You see them every day at the allahowler demonstrations, teeth bared and growling, foaming at the mouth, that is the third generation. The next will undoubtedly be totally raving and rabid which will be a tough time for all, but the one after that will likely be able to do no more than drool, slobber and breed – the most basic of all instincts and the last to go. From then on it will be downhill all the way.

  7. islam oh hell Says:

    their main aim to just increase their population by hook or by cook.

  8. jwtx Says:

    I agree, I know someone who is married to their first cousin from Jordan. His face is abnormal an so is the color is not normal in his eyes, they are blotchy around the iris. Why don’t they educate in there countries not to do this. No wonder its crazy in the muslims world.

  9. As Gill Says:

    If the ignorant English people bothered to do research on Pakistan as a nation they wouldn’t just follow an article based upon one tiny minority from a remote part of Pakistan.
    For centuries the people of the region forming Pakistan have been marrying nations and tribes from across the world. Pakistanis of today trace their ancestral heritage back to the races of ancient kingdoms from the Aryan, Persian, Greek, Turk, Arab, Afghan, Mongol and even English empires.
    The people in question who practice cousin marriages are mainly Pakistani Kashmir’s (85% Brit Pakistanis). They originate from a tiny city in the hills of the Kashmir known as Mirpur. The region in itself is isolated and mountainous, therefore marrying within the family has been the norm.
    Pakistanis from the urban areas are much more forward thinking and marry outside the family and even to different races as was seen in history when Pakistanis from the North East were taken to Australia by the British to penetrate deep into the harsh Australian outback, many of these men married aboriginal women. Marriages between different races is common amongst Pakistanis but unfortunately the British Pakistanis (Mirpuries) still have the same village mentality however things are changing and only with time will people move on.
    Ps – this is also not an Islamic problem as Islam is clear and gives permission and actively encourages Muslims to marry fellow Muslims from the darkest parts of the earth to the lightest parts.

    • Ronin Says:

      Gee not islam just culture. Hmm why didn’t someone tell me that before? Reality check: anything, any crime, any abuse can be easily justified in the name of islam. Cousin marriages paki? BS try iran, egypt, UK any place you find minions.

    • Leatherneck Says:

      Islam is a disease, and I’m the cure.

  10. islams not for me Says:

    So if the islamic system allows ‘Moslems to marry fellow moslems” then its no wonder they have so many problems in thier gentics and DNA.

  11. Mullah Lodabullah Says:

    * not an Islamic problem

    It never is. islam is perfect, like its “god” and its “prophet”.

  12. rich Says:

    this inbreeding is 1000s of yera old it started with mohemad, he maried his own daughter in law,

    muslim beleive to keep it in the family

    there is lots of incest in islam, as girls cannot meet boys outside so u know what happens in the house at night

    in indai there was a case a year ago

    a father in law raped his daughter in law, the case went to the muslim mullah in the village, this englightned soul pased a jadgement

    the wonem had become the sons mother in law, she was asked to divorce the son and marry the father, whch she refused and hence the case came to light,

    in short in islam u can rape, allah is all forgiving

    allah o akbar

  13. Chris Says:

    Yeah, lots of inbreeding among crazy christian conservatives in america too…

    • tgusa Says:

      Frightening To you I’m sure. Thankfully lefturds have ceased breeding or are trying to breed homosexuals as an alternative. Pity for you. I think you should have your own America, where there are no Christians, only muslims, oh, and homosexuals too. Tell me how it works out, if you can.

    • Ronin Says:

      We are on to the moral equivalency scam, if you are not intelligent enough to actually discuss an issue then you should stick to comic con and world of war craft.

  14. Leatherneck Says:

    I can’t stand inbreeds with their bad teeth, and funny looking eyes.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: