Defense Analyst: Homosexual Soldiers Pose a Security Risk

Hey, I kept trying to tell other Conservative bloggers that their “sheeple-ish” criticism of WikiLeaks’ founder Julian Assange was all part of a ploy by the Obama administration to deflect blame away from the real traitor, Private Bradley Manning.

Why?  Because Pvt. Manning is a queer whose motivations for stealing military secrets are directly related to his homosexual activism.  Naturally, if more attention had been given to an activist queer in the military stealing reams of secret documents, the “repeal” of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell would have been seriously jeopardized.  Thus, during the period of time in which the “repeal” of DODT was on the table, Obama and his “psychophants” in the Lame Stream Media directed everyone’s attention towards the messenger, Julian Assange, while completely ignoring the actions and motivations of the real (and quite queer) traitor, Pvt. Manning.

For all you bloggers out there who focused on trashing Assange without mentioning the motivations behind Pvt. Manning’s traitorous actions, congratulations!—You just unwittingly became Obama’s bitch.

Remember, when it comes to Obama and his fellow commies, always watch what the other hand is doing:

Maginnis: Homosexual soldiers a security risk
Chad Groening – OneNewsNow – 1/17/2011

A national defense analyst and Pentagon advisor suggests the Army private accused of giving classified documents to an online whistleblower was already a security risk because of his alleged lifestyle.

Private Bradley Manning was charged in July for leaking classified material, including a video posted by WikiLeaks of a 2007 U.S. Apache helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed a Reuters News photographer and his driver. But Manning is suspected of leaking troves of other material to the site, which is in the process of posting more than 250,000 secret U.S. State Department cables.

“Apparently this young man is an alleged homosexual. The reason he downloaded and gave away these files allegedly had something to do with a fractured relationship that he had had with a fellow soldier,” Maginnis explains. “It used to be in the federal government that homosexuality was a marker for a security risk — you’d be identified, and therefore, you could be blackmailed. At various points in the history of the country, it was a psychiatric phenomenon; it was a disqualifier for a host of things.”

The defense analyst maintains there is no question that repealing the law excluding homosexuals from military service will be a black mark on the 111th Congress.

Explore posts in the same categories: Gay Agenda, Military, politics

8 Comments on “Defense Analyst: Homosexual Soldiers Pose a Security Risk”

  1. tgusa Says:

    Homosexuals put their lifestyle before everything else and there is no room for that in the US military, who’s primary mission is to protect and defend the Constitution. When the Constitution becomes secondary we don’t need that military any longer. Remember, the US military was only created to fight to install that Constitution. Of course I will be honest, I believe that when you join the military everything becomes secondary to your primary mission, and that includes military families, which I am not a fan of. I don’t believe that a military life is compatible with traditional family life and I think it takes a very special person to make that arrangement work, there are few that are capable of this. As far as I am concerned, you can do what you want, but as soon as that becomes the priority, family, homosexuality, vegetarianism, I don’t care, you are out!

  2. islams not for me Says:

    I suggest a comprimise with homosexuals.

    IF they put thier ‘desires’ over the Security of the USA (or elsewhere) they WILL NEVER gain a higher position because with actions like these they should never be allowed near any classified information.

    What they should do with that private is to shoot him dead.

  3. Leatherneck Says:

    Reprobate.

  4. tgusa Says:

    They had better reach out to homosexuals and other non traditional members because increasingly, thats the only pool they have to draw from. The army they used to have is no longer on their side, I’m talking about the traditional American citizen soldier, yeah, that terrorist, good luck with you experiment General B*****k.

    • tgusa Says:

      And one last thought. You rino rats and democrats had better begim havin lots of children, you are going to need them to fight for your vioson odf Amerixca, yeah, thats how it works. something is created, people cherish it, and then they fight or die to defend it. Well, thats the way it used to work.

      Ya know, for decades I have had one question posed to me over all others, where is America in the Bible? The answer is, we’re fightin each other, for killin and hatin on innocent people, its in the Bible, just like Jerimiah Wright preached.

  5. Che Says:

    Queer, homosexual – that stupid American political correctness…. Faggot, that’s what he is….


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: