Daily Mail UK Picks Up on Hawaiian Gov. Abercrombie’s Evasiveness Concerning Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate
World Net Daily was all over this a couple of days ago. Now, it seems to be picking up some steam in more mainstream publications:
Hawaii governor claims record of Obama’s birth ‘exists in archives’ but can’t produce the vital document
Pressure was mounting on Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie today amid increasing confusion over whether President Obama was born there.
Abercrombie said on Tuesday that an investigation had unearthed papers proving Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961.
He told Honolulu’s Star-Advertiser: ‘It actually exists in the archives, written down,’ he said.
But it became apparent that what had been discovered was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate.
And in the same interview Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.
He said efforts were still being made to track down definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii.
Abercrombie was asked: ‘You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plan to release more information regarding President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. How is that coming?’
He acknowledged the birth certificate issue would have ‘political implications’ for the next presidential election ‘that we simply cannot have’.
‘It’s a matter of principle with me,’ the 72-year-old said. ‘I knew his mum and dad. I was here when he was born. Anybody who wants to ask a question honestly could have had their answer already.’
[…]Explore posts in the same categories: politics