Political Speech Doesn’t Kill People, People Kill People

A nice little editorial piece by Matt Welch of Reason that I thought you all might like to read.  You can read it in its entirety by CLICKING HERE.

Against ‘Incitement’
Political speech doesn’t kill people, people kill people

Matt Welch from the April 2011 issue of Reason

When a significant portion of the commentariat decided in early January that enough hyperbolic, martially themed political rhetoric was enough, that it was time for journalists to purge words like “battleground” from their election reporting and certainly long past time for the Republican Party to erase such eliminationist modifiers as “job-killing” to describe Democratic legislation like Obama-Care, not a single member of the newly cautious caucus pointed a cautionary finger at Chris Hedges.

Chris Hedges, if you haven’t heard of him, is a Pulitzer-winning New York Times war correspondent turned apocalyptic essayist for the lefty website Truthdig.com. He is someone who, after Greek protesters burned banks and murdered innocents in 2010, wrote: “Here’s to the Greeks. They know what to do when corporations pillage and loot their country.” Around that same time he wrote a piece titled “This Country Needs a Few Good Communists.” And as many commie nostalgics tend to do, Hedges has repeatedly claimed that the modern U.S. is comparable to Hitler’s Germany.

Jared Loughner’s murderous rampage in Tucson, Arizona, which killed six, wounded 13 others, and prompted a national re-think of violence-tinged alarmism, did nothing to dull Hedges’ tongue. Days after the massacre, he wrote that “Corporate systems of power are instruments of death that can be fought only by physical acts of resistance.”

And yet the only mention of Hedges I could find in the lengthy discussion of post-Loughner political rhetoric came from Hartford Courant columnist Susan Campbell, who paraphrased him arguing that “the left’s dedication to tolerance makes it ineffective in the face of intolerance.” Intolerance in the face of intolerance is no vice.

I bring up Hedges not because I think that his words incite violence, but because I am convinced they do not. And I am just as convinced that most of the people calling for a “new tone,” for a rhetorical disarmament in the discussion of politics, are motivated not by an equal opportunity antipathy to non-empirical hyperbole, but by a partisan revulsion at excess from the side whose beliefs they happen to find distasteful.

[…]

There is a happy ending to this grim business, and not just Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’ miraculous recovery from a bullet to her brain. Politicians and pundits may be panicking, but the American people have largely kept their heads—much as they did in the days and months after September 11, though few gave them credit at the time. Polls showed solid majorities rejecting any link between political rhetoric and Loughner’s violence.

Um…  By using a parallelism, is he suggesting that there’s no link between Islam and terrorism?  I sure hope not.

Calls to enact ill-advised legislation have mostly (though not totally) stalled out. Not only is Chris Hedges still free to make hyperbolic comparisons to Hitler’s Germany, so are his analogues on the anti-Obama right. We should welcome the opportunity to refute them on their merits, instead of seeking to banish them from the great American debate.

Matt Welch is editor in chief of reason.

Explore posts in the same categories: Leftists, Liberals, politics, protest

6 Comments on “Political Speech Doesn’t Kill People, People Kill People”

  1. tgusa Says:

    Hitlers Germany? This is disturbing because the left always projects what they really want.

    The truth is, in Hitlers Germany if you had anything negative to say about it you either whispered it or just said nothing at all, well, I told you they project.

    I think they also hate Jews, so they have that going for them as well.

  2. Bob Says:

    This Country Needs a Few Good Communists.
    The only good commie is a dead commie.

  3. tgusa Says:

    Interestingly, the guy who cut off his wife’s head in NY goes a far as to blame the lack of an alternative mechanism for his maniacal outburst. That’s right, he is blaming those who pander to muslim sensibilities that have been carried over from their foreign lands. You see, by not demanding they shape up and integrate we are actually contributing to the delinquency of western muslim men. This guys wife might still be alive today if some of us had not enabled, ignored or obfuscated his abhorrent behavior.


    • Gee, imagine that; a muzzie killing and then playing the victim card. Why am I not surprised?

      Cheers

      P.S – Sorry I’m running late in posting anything. Our Little Princess decided to wake everyone up at around 3:00 a.m. and we didn’t get back to sleep until almost dawn. Still a little groggy. Maybe I’ll make some more coffee.

  4. islams not for me Says:

    It seems to me that leftists have a love / hate ‘relationship with capitalism and materialism.

    On the one hand they despise all things ‘concervative’ and on the other they love those things that are counter to thier own systems like islam, communism, socialism and so forth.

    It seems to me that the leftists are willing and able to commit a type of suicide because they are so willing to embrace anything as long as they get thier ‘rocks off’ first.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: