Osama Bin Laden Unarmed When Shot and Killed!? UPDATED and EXPANDED
Apparently, many drive-by readers didn’t get the point of my article yesterday in which I accused Obama of being a murderer. The point is that Obama talks and talks about taking the moral high road when dealing with terrorists. For years, he has made a living ragging on the Bush Administration’s use of non-life-threatening torture to extract information from scum of the earth, mass-murdering terrorists. Obama purports to be above all of that; finding torture and killing to be morally reprehensible, blah, blah, blah, ad nauseam.
Obama has even gone so far as to seriously endanger the lives of our men and women fighting overseas by implementing severely constraining rules of engagement. Many of our children have died in Afghanistan all because of Obama’s fatuously idealistic policies. What? Do you really think it is merely a coincidence that the moment Obama implemented his kumbayah rules of engagement, the death rates of our soldiers in Afghanistan skyrocketed out of control? The link is undeniable. It’s a direct cause and effect link. Ergo, Obama is directly responsible for the deaths of our children overseas.
Speaking of killing our children, Obama believes it is okay to kill innocent babies partially out of the womb. Where is the high moral ground there, Mr. Obama? The only high ground there is the ground the aborted babies are buried in—if they are lucky enough even be buried.
So, why shouldn’t I point the hypocrisy inherent in Obama’s action of ordering the killing of Osama Bin Laden? After all, the Lame Stream Media isn’t going to do it; they are way too busy with Administration Fellation to even see Obama’s hypocrisy staring them straight in the face.
Since the Lame Stream Media won’t do it, someone has got to stand up and point out that the emperor is naked! And that someone might as well be me!
So, again I reiterate; if we are to hold Obama to the same holier-than-thou, high moral standards he held Bush to all these years ( and why shouldn’t we? ), then it’s quite simple: OBAMA IS A COLD-BLOODED MURDERER!
New details coming out of the White House just go to confirm that assessment:
White House modifies Osama bin Laden account
The White House backed away Monday evening from key details in its narrative about the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, including claims by senior U.S. officials that the Al Qaeda leader had a weapon and may have fired it during a gun battle with U.S. forces.
Officials also retreated from claims that one of bin Laden’s wives was killed in the raid and that bin Laden was using her as a human shield before she was shot by U.S. forces.
At a televised White House briefing Monday afternoon, Deputy National Security Adviser John Brennan said bin Laden joined in the fight that several residents of the Abbottabad, Pakistan, compound put up against the Navy SEALs during the 40-minute operation.
“He [bin Laden] was engaged in a firefight with those that entered the area of the house he was in. And whether or not he got off any rounds, I quite frankly don’t know,” Brennan said.
At a Pentagon briefing earlier in the day, a senior defense official said bin Laden used a woman as a human shield so he could fire shots. “He was firing behind her,” the official said.
In another background briefing early Monday morning, a senior administration official also said bin Laden put up a fight. “He did resist the assault force. And he was killed in a firefight,” the official said.
However, during a background, off-camera briefing for television reporters later Monday, a senior White House official said bin Laden was not armed when he was killed, apparently by the U.S. raid team.
Another White House official familiar with the TV briefing confirmed the change to POLITICO, adding, “I’m not aware of him having a weapon.”
How’s that Nobel Peace Prize working out for you, Mr, Obama?Explore posts in the same categories: politics