57 Percent of All U.S. Military Deaths in Afghanistan Happened Under Obama’s Leadership—In Only 2 1/2 Years and Counting!

Here’s how I arrived at that figure:

U.S. Death Toll in Afghanistan under Bush (October 2001 to January 31, 2009 (Yes, I’m giving Obama the benefit of the doubt)) = 645

(source: www.icasualties.org)

Total U.S. Death Toll in Afghanistan as of June 2, 2011 = 1491

(source:  www.defense.gov)

1491 – 645 = 846

Therefore:

U.S. Death Toll in Afghanistan under Obama as of June 2, 2011 = 846

(846/1491)*100 =  56.74 (rounded down)

Rounding up, we get 57 percent!

Folks, if this statistic were touted on the evening news every single night, Obama would be a goner!  That’s why the Lame Stream Media has hit the mute button.

Time to publicize the fact that in only 2 1/2 short years, Obama’s Kumbayah Kinetic Warfare policies have killed more U.S. servicemen in Afghanistan than Bush ever did in his entire 8 years in office!—56.7 percent more, to be more precise!

How’s all that Hope and Change working for ya’?

Afghan Death Toll Rises; Media Interest Declines

Joseph Klein – FrontPage 

The war in Afghanistan gets little attention by the mainstream media these days. But the loss of American lives continues to mount. Just last week, seven U.S. troops were killed by a powerful bomb which had exploded in a field where they were patrolling on foot. At least twenty-eight Americans have been killed in May, 2011 alone, according to the Associated Press.

To date, the Department of Defense has identified 1582 American service members who have died as part of the Afghanistan war and related operations, the majority of whom were killed since President Obama took office. During the Obama administration, more American service members have died in Afghanistan than during all the prior years since the Afghanistan war began in 2001.

For the U.S. military, 2010 was the deadliest year of the Afghanistan war so far. 499 service members died. Additionally, there were 5,182 US forces wounded in 2010. This represents more than half of all U.S. forces wounded in the entire Afghanistan war, which totaled 9,957 at the end of 2010.

The total U.S. military deaths compiled by the Defense Department for Operation Enduring Freedom for the years 2001 through 2010 are as follows:

Two factors have contributed to the increase in American fatalities during the Obama administration. The first reason is President Obama’s decision in December 2009 to send 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan. This Obama “surge” represented a major escalation of America’s military presence there, putting more of our soldiers in harm’s way.

The second factor contributing to the increase in American fatalities since President Obama took office has been the more restrictive rules of engagement that the Obama administration has put in place to reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties. These rules, although loosened somewhat under General Petraeus, have restricted the use of air power and heavy weaponry in populated areas and prohibited our troops from shooting at the enemy unless fired upon first. This has the effect of shifting more of the risk of engagement from the Taliban and its allies to our own troops.

While statistics of civilian casualties resulting directly from NATO and International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) military action have shown a decline during the last two years as stricter rules of engagement have been implemented to protect civilians from harm, civilians are still losing their lives from NATO attacks.

In the most recent example, on May 30, 2011 a NATO airstrike killed at least nine civilians in Afghanistan, including several women and children.

This latest incident occurred less than three months after NATO helicopter gunners had killed nine boys collecting firewood to heat their homes in the eastern Afghanistan mountains, mistaking them for Taliban insurgents. The killing of the nine boys, in turn, occurred less than two weeks after tribal elders in the Pech valley area of Kunar province had claimed NATO forces killed more than fifty civilians in air and ground strikes, a claim denied by NATO.

These are not isolated incidents. NATO airstrikes, including on houses where Taliban insurgents are believed to be hiding, have inflicted a heavy toll on Afghan civilians. Angered by the latest civilian deaths, President Hamid Karzai said on May 31st he will no longer allow NATO airstrikes on houses.

“If this is repeated,” Karzai warned, “Afghanistan has a lot of ways of stopping it, but we don’t want to go there.” He said that NATO forces risk being seen as an “occupying force,” utilizing one of the Taliban insurgents’ key talking points.

NATO officials apologized for the latest incident, but responded to Karzai’s threat that airstrikes on houses are essential and will continue.

Moreover, despite more U.S. troops committed to fighting the anti-government terrorist forces and providing more security to civilians, the number of civilian deaths at the hands of the terrorist forces has actually increased during the first two years of the Obama administration.

The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) issues annual reports with statistics, which constitute the most reliable source available for data on civilian casualties.

The following describes the data on civilian deaths in Afghanistan from UNAMA reports for the first two years of the Obama administration, with some comparisons to prior year figures during the Bush administration:

Explore posts in the same categories: Abuse of Power, Afghanistan, By Ronin, Obama Sucks, politics, statistics

3 Comments on “57 Percent of All U.S. Military Deaths in Afghanistan Happened Under Obama’s Leadership—In Only 2 1/2 Years and Counting!”

  1. tgusa Says:

    Fortunately the enemy doesn’t have a lot of places to hide in Flintstan. That’s why we see the open field or trail-side bomb. It is also the reason they are forced to hide among the civilian population. I would think the field bomb would be easy to detect with ground penetrating radar but the civilian city campaign is a grizzly affair and really impossible to stamp out under the current ROE. Another front in this fight where the enemy has seen success is the infiltration method but that’s a whole other story of its own. The infiltration campaign can be summed up as something we planned to do to ourselves.

    On the other hand America has been lucky so far. During a lesser time period of the Vietnam War almost 400 servicemen from my county alone were KIA. And in those days, given the population of that time, that was a hell of a lot of young men to lose.

  2. itscott Says:

    You should update this count, and post another blog. Being an election year, this would be an interesting statistic.


    • That’s a great idea! Think I’ll get my numbers updated:

      Looking into it, icasualties.com is showing 2088 American deaths as of today. However, a helicopter was shot down this morning with 7 Americans killed in the crash. icasualties.com hasn’t updated to include that, so I will: 2088 + 7 = 2095 – Bush’s 575 (as accepted by http://www.justforeignpolicy.org) = 1520.

      So, percentage wise, that would be: 1520 / 2088 = 0.7255 x 100 = 72.55 percent!!!

      Yup, Obama accounts for 72.55 percent of Americans killed in Afghanistan — in only 3 1/2 years!

      Cheers


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: