Pedophilic Polygynist Muzzies Exploit Loopholes in Australian Law; Collect Welfare for All Wives and Children

I wonder how many immigrant Muzzies are doing the same thing here in the U.S.?

Sharia law at work in Australia

Chris Merritt, Legal affairs editor – The Australian

SHARIA law has become a shadow legal system within Australia, endorsing polygamous and underage marriages that are outlawed under the Marriage Act.

A system of “legal pluralism” based on sharia law “abounds” in Australia, according to new research by legal academics Ann Black and Kerrie Sadiq.

They have found that Australian Muslims have long been complying with the shadow system of religious law as well as mainstream law.

But in family law, not all Muslims were registering their marriages and some were relying on religious ceremonies to validate unions that breached the Marriage Act.

This included “polygynist marriages”, in which a man takes multiple wives, and marriages where one party is under the lawful marriage age.

Their research, which will be published on Monday in the University of NSW Law Journal, says that the wider community has been “oblivious to the legal pluralism that abounds in this country”.

The findings come soon after Ikebal Patel, president of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, triggered a backlash inside the Islamic community when he called for Australia to compromise with Islam and embrace legal pluralism.

Mr Patel later said he supported secular law and it had been a mistake to even mention legal pluralism.

The latest research has found that while polygamy is unlawful, mainstream law accommodates men who arrive in Australia with multiple wives and gives some legal standing to multiple partnerships that originate in Australia.

“Valid Muslim polygynist marriages, lawfully entered into overseas, are recognised, with second and third wives and their children able to claim welfare and other benefits,” they write.

Changes to the Family Law Act in 2008 meant that polygamous religious marriages entered into in Australia could also be recognised as de facto marriages. “It means a second wife can be validly married under Islamic law . . . and be a defacto wife under Australian law with the same legal entitlements as any other de facto relationship,” they write.

The findings on polygamy were confirmed yesterday by Islamic community leader Kuranda Seyit. His personal view was “one wife is enough”. But a small minority of Muslim men were taking second wives in ways that breached family law and their Islamic obligations.

“A second wife is permitted under Islam, but it is very difficult and there must be absolutely equal treatment of both wives,” said Mr Seyit, who is director of the Forum on Australia’s Islamic Relations.

He was aware of a very small number of “exploitative” arrangements in which men were taking much younger second wives and not complying with the sharia requirement of equal treatment.

“It’s definitely a minority, but unfortunately is does exist and I think it comes down to the standard of living that Australia affords many men who normally would not be able to afford such a situation,” Mr Seyit said.

In their article, associate professor Sadiq and Ms Black note that research on Islamic marriage found in 2008 that 90 per cent of Muslims did not want to change Australian law.

They write that many Muslims support the protection of human rights and had come to Australia because of practices such as genital mutilation and honour killings in countries ruled by unreformed versions of sharia.

However, they suggest there should be “tweaking” of family law to take account of sharia.

They suggest that the Family Law Act could be changed to ensure that when courts make parenting orders Muslim children are given similar rights to those enjoyed by indigenous children.

This would require courts to consider they have a right to enjoy their own culture and the culture of people who share their culture.

Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland said if there was ever any inconsistency between cultural values and the rule of law “then Australian law wins out”.

“There is only one law that’s applicable in Australia – that’s Australian law based on our common law tradition,” he said. “Our constitutional founders included a provision against the state endorsing or prescribing any religion or religious practice.”

He said the Family Law Act included specific provision for courts to consider, among other factors, an individual’s lifestyle and background culture and traditions. “The government believes these provisions to be adequate,” Mr McClelland said.

Explore posts in the same categories: Australia, Female Genital Mutilation, immigration, Pedophilia, Polygamy, Sharia, Welfare

15 Comments on “Pedophilic Polygynist Muzzies Exploit Loopholes in Australian Law; Collect Welfare for All Wives and Children”

  1. Gonzo Says:

    Is it in the USA? – well, if this article is any indicator, I’d say, yes.

    And since, as the article states, immigration tends to have a “dont ask dont know” policy, apparently, it is not even tracked, despite being illegal.

  2. Big Frank Says:

    The legal system and the feckless, spineless, apologist, lapdogs and lackeys of Islam in our political class turn a blind eye to this and many other rampant fraud schemes, and outright crimes perpetrated by so-called Muslims due to the fact the PC bastards are hard up for anyone to pull a lever on election day. The day of politicians standing on principles is long gone except for a very few. Most have prostituted themselves out for a few cheap votes, and cringe at the slightest notion of being branded as ‘racist’ or insensitive to other cultures. BTW I’m fed up for having to pay for these freeloaders many of whom are on the dole.

  3. The quick way to find who are the Wests allies are. Ban sharia laws and force those who have broken our laws to change or go back to mecca.


    • Big Frank Says:

      I agree, as a firm supporter of the assimilate or vacate concept. The biggest joke is the hypocrites in the political class that preach ‘equality’ for all and then bend over backwards to accommodate the ‘followers of the teachings of the prophet’, giving in to their every whim or demand. We cannot have these ‘fifth columns. which are growing so large that they become colonies and ‘Muslim zones’ within our countries.

  4. john Says:

    its not good but still our people even they are married but they do gave girl friends and they are cheating their wife and kids what we will say about them, so before we point them out first we see our faults

    • Leatherneck Says:

      No, there will be no more turning the other cheek to the false religious system known as moon god worship aka Islam.

      These stated followers of the pedophile Muhammad need to be deported post haste.

      BZO, or Die puke face!

  5. Well John perhaps you want to live under a Theocratic system where underage marriage and worse are part of a culture and religion.

    That is what islam is…

    To defend it means that you support such maddness.

  6. john Says:

    i am not defending any one , its duty of our leadership and policy makers that must make such acts that they will not get any benifits from the govt for their 2nd or what ever wife and kids, if they want to have their 2nd wife they must support her at their own ,must not depend on our tax

    • tgusa Says:

      If they cannot afford their first wife they shouldn’t even be considering a second wife. And it doesn’t take a bureaucrat to figure that out.

      Someday maybe I will relate a horror story I have experienced and what US bureaucrats, along with their leftist leech supporters have done to my dear friend, after they had broken her in to bits and were through using her, of course. What goes around comes around.

  7. More on the “sharia law” alcohol flogging – now being spun as “unpaid debts” by “sources” – Binnie was a martyr, now in paradise, according to alleged instigator of attack, who follows “controversial” imam Sheikh Feiz :

  8. john Says:

    then why our Govt keep hiring people from other nations,why there is a skill short list introduced.. why they make a charming ways to bring international students to enter in the system? may be we are not able to produce our own Doctors, Engg,and other skilled needed in the country, then offcourse we have to depend on other nations, lets first make this awareness among our own people then we can point a finger on other nations, hope you guys can understand my point,its not defend sum1 its to save our nation.

    • tgusa Says:

      Perhaps because the leftist animals own our so called institutions of higher learning and have excluded many Americans from their rightful places there.

      • Big Frank Says:

        They have turned most of our ‘institutions of higher learning into ‘commie factories’, turning out brainwashed, leftist, drones and dupes.

    • tgusa Says:

      If we had continued to educate our own instaed of excluding them then the educated leftists could have gone forth and created more of these institutions in these people home countries, which would have raised standards both herev and there. But of course, they cannot do that as Ed leftist would be killed in a flash for a broken and frayed shoelace. Heck, maybe its not too late to enact this plan.

    • Leatherneck Says:

      I’m sorry John, I first thought you were defending moon god worship.

      You are correct our nation needs to square it’s self away.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: