Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg to Egypt: When Drafting a Constitution Don’t Look at Our ‘Rather Old’ One
She then goes on to suggest Egyptians should closely examine the Constitutions of Canada and South Africa, along with the European Convention on Human Rights treaty, when formulating their own Constitution; heck, anything after WWII, just NOT the U.S. Constitution!
Gee, I don’t recall seeing any of those documents upholding the rights of citizens to bear arms…
Of course, it’s not all that surprising since the decrepit little termagant, Ginsburg, has always hated the U.S. Constitution. That’s why she continually cites international laws for her legal opinions whenever she doesn’t like what the U.S. Constitution has to say.
Anyway, listening to Ginsburg speak is like watching paint dry, so I have included transcript excerpts for those of you who wish to avoid the video:
Following are excerpts from an interview with US Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, which aired on Al-Hayat TV on January 30, 2012.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: It is a very inspiring time – that you have overthrown a dictator, and that you are striving to achieve a genuine democracy. So I think people in the United States are hoping that this transition will work, and that there will genuinely be a government of, by, and for the people.
I met with the head of the elections commission. I think that the first step has gone well, and that elections have been held for the lower house that everyone has considered to be free and fair. So that’s one milestone, and the next will be the drafting of a constitution.
I can’t speak about what the Egyptian experience should be, because I’m operating under a rather old constitution. The United States, in comparison to Egypt, is a very new nation, and yet we have the oldest written constitution still in force in the world.
That’s because it’s such a great Constitution, Ms. Ginsburg!
Let me say first that a constitution, as important as it is, will mean nothing unless the people are yearning for liberty and freedom. If the people don’t care, then the best constitution in the world won’t make any difference. So the spirit of liberty has to be in the population, and then the constitution – first, it should safeguard basic fundamental human rights, like our First Amendment, the right to speak freely, and to publish freely, without the government as a censor.
What? No Freedom of Religion? I’m pretty sure the Greek Orthodox Church would appreciate a little freedom of religion, Ms. Ginsburg.
You should certainly be aided by all the constitution-writing that has gone one since the end of World War II. I would not look to the US constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary… It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done. Much more recent than the US constitution – Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It dates from 1982. You would almost certainly look at the European Convention on Human Rights. Yes, why not take advantage of what there is elsewhere in the world?
And, we ALL thank God you weren’t the one drafting Our Constitution, Ms. Ginsburg.