Muslim Judge in Pennsylvania Dismisses Case Against Muzzy Who Attacked Athiest Exercising Free Speech; Tells Athiest He Would Be Killed in a Muslim Country

This is why Sharia Law has no place in a Free society and, why Muslim judges are a bad idea.  Of course, I’m thinking the atheist is wishing he had had a Christian judge right about now.

Not to worry though, he’ll get his Christian “Judge” in the end:

Muslim Admits to Attacking Atheist; Muslim Judge Dismisses Case

By Al Stefanelli – Opposing Views

The Pennsylvania State Director of American Atheists, Inc., Mr. Ernest Perce V., was assaulted by a Muslim while participating in a Halloween parade. Along with a Zombie Pope, Ernest was costumed as Zombie Muhammad. The assault was caught on video, the Muslim man admitted to his crime and charges were filed in what should have been an open-and-shut case. That’s not what happened, though.

The defendant is an immigrant and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet.

The case went to trial, and as circumstances would dictate, Judge Mark Martin is also a Muslim. What transpired next was surreal. The Judge not only ruled in favor of the defendant, but called Mr. Perce a name and told him that if he were in a Muslim country, he’d be put to death. Judge Martin’s comments included,

“Having had the benefit of having spent over 2 and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. In fact I have a copy of the Koran here and I challenge you sir to show me where it says in the Koran that Mohammad arose and walked among the dead. I think you misinterpreted things. Before you start mocking someone else’s religion you may want to find out a little bit more about it it makes you look like a dufus and Mr. (Defendant) is correct. In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society. 

Judge Martin then offered a lesson in Islam, stating,

“Islam is not just a religion, it’s their culture, their culture. It’s their very essence their very being. They pray five times a day towards Mecca to be a good Muslim, before you die you have to make a pilgrimage to Mecca unless you are otherwise told you can not because you are too ill too elderly, whatever but you must make the attempt. Their greetings wa-laikum as-Salâm (is answered by voice) may god be with you. Whenever, it’s very common when speaking to each other it’s very common for them to say uh this will happen it’s it they are so immersed in it. 

Judge Martin further complicates the issue by not only abrogating the First Amendment, but completely misunderstanding it when he said,

“Then what you have done is you have completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very very very offensive. I’m a Muslim, I find it offensive. But you have that right, but you’re way outside your boundaries or first amendment rights. This is what, and I said I spent about 7 and a half years living in other countries. when we go to other countries it’s not uncommon for people to refer to us as ugly Americans this is why we are referred to as ugly Americans, because we are so concerned about our own rights we don’t care about other people’s rights as long as we get our say but we don’t care about the other people’s say”

But wait, it gets worse….

The Judge refused to allow the video into evidence, and then said,

All that aside I’ve got here basically.. I don’t want to say he said she said but I’ve got two sides of the story that are in conflict with each other.”


“The preponderance of, excuse me, the burden of proof… “


“…he has not proven to me beyond a reasonable doubt that this defendant is guilty of harassment, therefore I am going to dismiss the charge”

The Judge neglected to address the fact that the ignorance of the law does not justify an assault and that it was the responsibility of the defendant to familiarize himself with our laws.  This is to say nothing of the judge counseling the defendant that it is also not acceptable for him to teach his children that it is acceptable to use violence in the defense of religious beliefs.  Instead, the judge gives Mr. Perce a lesson in Sharia law and drones on about the Muslim faith, inform everyone in the court room how strongly he embraces Islam, that the first amendment does not allow anyone ” to piss off other people and other cultures” and he was also insulted by Mr. Perce’s portrayal of Mohammed and the sign he carried.

This is a travesty. Not only did Judge Martin completely ignore video evidence, but a Police Officer who was at the scene also testified on Mr. Perce’s behalf, to which the Judge also dismissed by saying the officer didn’t give an accurate account or doesn’t give it any weight.

Needless to say, this is totally, completely and unequivocally unacceptable. That a Muslim immigrant can assault a United States citizen in defense of his religious beliefs and walk away a free man, while the victim is chastised and insulted by a Muslim judge who then blamed the victim for the crime committed against him is a horrible abrogation.

This reeks of those cases we used to read about where a woman is blamed for her own rape because she “was asking for it” by virtue of the clothing she chose to wear, and then having the Judge set the rapist free.

I can promise you this, you have not heard the last of this issue. Not by a long shot.

Explore posts in the same categories: Abuse of Power, Creeping Sharia, Justice System, muslim Intolerance, Muslims in The USA

29 Comments on “Muslim Judge in Pennsylvania Dismisses Case Against Muzzy Who Attacked Athiest Exercising Free Speech; Tells Athiest He Would Be Killed in a Muslim Country”

  1. tgusa Says:

    I was brought up constantly schooled on the fact that ignorance of the law is no excuse. Now I have looked but I cannot find that in our Constitution so I guess I don’t have to pay attention to that bs anymore.

    However, Rebellion against ignorant law is in the Constitution.

    A course this did happen in Pennsylvania so they probably feel relatively safe but I wouldn’t suggest that the judge and his pals try this in other areas, they could end up hurt, and not just their feelings either.

  2. Leatherneck Says:

    Screw Islam, and screw the child rapist Muhammad.

    Thank you for allowing me freedom of speech here.

    • 1MuslimUmmah Says:

      I’m glad u use ur freedom of speech so productively. Real contribution to human history. Nevermind. Cold hearted ignorant people are soon forgotten unlike our beloved Prophet who is still very much loved over 1400 years after he passed. U might get 14 seconds from anyone willing to bare the depression they stoop into by simply thinking about u. How’s that for freedom of speech? This really is fun.

      • Leatherneck Says:

        How does it feel to follow Muhammad who murdered, and raped? Plus, the god Sin, or the god, also known as allah is a false moon god.

        • 1MuslimUmmah Says:

          I know millions of Muslims follow Islam from the Middle East. Good, honest, hard working men women and children. What ever corruption has transpired in the message reaching these distant lands doesn’t surprise me. I follow the legacy of the goodness that exists in over a billion Muslims today. Your lies and corrupt way of thinking gains no ground or progress on Islam. Islam always rises above these lies as though people like you haven’t tried to destroy Islam over the past 1400 years. Never gets old and never prevails. Islam only gets stronger as the lies get thwarted. Thanks for the boost!

          • Gonzo Says:

            I don’t believe that ignoring logical analysis of some of muhammad’s exploits can technically be considered “thwarted”. More like ignored or explained away so that the listener does not have to employ critical thinking.

            Also, in that islam is also a totalitarian political system that cannot bear criticism of any form, and given that any dissent or questioning of lies promoted by islamic leaders results in blasphemy and apostasy charges which further result in severe punishment, I would hardly label such attempts at truth seeking as being a “boost” for islam, rather, further examples of islams intolerance of freedom of belief and the squashing of truth and critical thinking.

            Would you care to debate some of muhammad’s exploits?

  3. In all honesty I am not suprised that a annoying atheist got attacked by a pissed off muslim. It seems to me that is exactly what the nutter wanted.

    I say they should investigate both the lawyer and judge. IF they support muslims over non muslims get rid of both of them out of the court system and outta politics!

    • 1MuslimUmmah Says:

      Good idea. And while they’re at it, let’s investigate every crooked cop, lawyer, politician, and judge who have a documented history of biased actions. No wait, that’d be a lot of white folk going down. Can’t have that. Two wrongs don’t make a right bit we passed two LONG AGO. So get real. I don’t agree with biased or unfair actions but u guys kill me when u speak up only when its about Muslims. Some of u might be stand up guys standing up for fairness but based on the history of this blog I highly doubt it. I just like to stir up the conversation with real thoughts when all the bloggers sound like programmed zombies saying yes, yes, all Muslims are bad. Yes yes all Muslims are evil. Yes yes we will eat dirt because Muslims don’t. Zombie mode for real.

      • Leatherneck Says:

        Islam plays it’s role well. Muslims hate the Bill of Rights, and attack it. There will be blood shed before America gets rid of the Constitution, and Bill of Rights.

        Screw you, you moon god worshiping POS!

  4. 1sam2 Says:

    Of course this judge should be sacked. But in our politically correct world he will probably be promoted and the atheist will be stoned to death.

  5. Pete Says:

    Well as Gov. Christie said, ““This Sharia Law business is just crap… and I’m tried of dealing with the crazies,”. Then I would suggest he STOP dealing with muslims!

    2 Saudis are in prison for bringing their slaves to the US, apparently they didn’t know slavery is illegal in the US. A Muslim man in Arizona is in prison for running over his daughter with a car – apparently he didn’t know honor killings in the US are considered murder.

    Where is the ACLU? Oh my bad a MOSLEM attacked the atheist not a christian!! Free speech does not exist in Europe any more when you talk about moslems NOW that disease has come to the US.


    I am so mad after reading this I an almost foaming at the mouth. This judge should be impeached immediately , he has NO right to be a judge – he doesn’t even know the constitution and he can not make up laws to suit his cult of violence, destruction and death.

    Well Christie – This Sharia Law business is NOT just crap it’s real and we are on the verge of self-destruction. Geert Wilders is 100% correct, the one thing islam fears the most is FREE SPEECH spoken by free men.

  6. Gonzo Says:

    Judges have an obligation of excusing themselves from hearing a case when they are unable to render an unbiased ruling. The fact that the judge threatened jail time to those who would release the audio of his opinion, leads me to believe that he knew his ruling was biased and wrong. As such, his duty to the justice system was to allow a non-biased judge to hear the case. What this also proves is that a muslim, holding a high position of trust, put his religion before Constitutional laws of the country.
    He needs to be removed from the bench as he is clearly incapable of upholding the laws of the land, the very duty he is being paid to do.

  7. Gonzo Says:

    Also, from a legal dictionary site, the opinion rendered by the so-called judge in this case as relates to the “fighting words” issue, (being that a muslim is offended by the atheists free speech).

    This legal definition goes on to state that use of “fighting words” cannot be considered a defense for assault and battery. The judgment of the Judge in this case is inexhaustibly in question.

  8. Gonzo Says:

    Another legal site that reinforces that there is no such thing as a provocation defense related to assault. Once again, provocation, such as exercising free speech, is NOT an excuse to assault someone. There may not have been significant battery in this case, but there was assault. The judge was in error. Period.

    • Excellent research, Gonzo! I love it!


      • Gonzo Says:

        Thanks. I’m not a lawyer, although I have taken a few law courses. I might see the judge’s point if someone were to parade dressed as zombie muhammad (and only muhammad) during an arab muslim festival, but even then, technically, there is freedom of speech, although then a reasonable person would assume that they would incite violence.

        But in this case, it was clearly an anti-religion demonstration, including various religions, not targeting muslims in general, and was entirely their right to do so. The judges commentary suggests that no one should ever be allowed to express themselves ever, because you never know if someone from some other country may find you offensive in a way that in their country would be problematic. That is utterly and completely asinine.

        • 1MuslimUmmah Says:

          Way to go team! Violence is not the answer and bias should never determine the outcome of a case but really? When does it not? I would have to say you are all white and blind to the racism that’s existed in this country since its inception. I don’t agree with this particular case but if I’m a white guy in a black neighborhood wearing a kkk outfit I probably wouldn’t make it out alive and most everyone would understand why and nor say he had every right to exercise his free speech. So let’s get real. Because this judge is Muslim now all Muslims want to institute Sharia law? U guys really do kill me. It’s almost so funny I can’t believe people actually post that their blood is boiling and they’re outraged. Welcome to the world of every minority in America who are CONSTANTLY discriminated against and treated worse than this case being simply dismissed. Lynchings, scalpings, gunned down, imprisoned, locked up, and raised to hate themselves. But another blow to Muslims. I actually enjoy these blogs because the ignorance is so entertaining. Especially when people say things like Muslims should go back to their countries as if Christianity originated in America. HILARIOUS! Oh and as though many Muslims weren’t born and raised here in America. Hoping you all wake up one day and realize that justice should exist FOR EVERYONE. Maybe, just maybe you will get a little fired up when injustices occur to whoever and whenever regardless of human differences. I do not know the full details of this case and believe very little I read on blogs with obvious agendas but if there were any injustices here, Allah knows best and we can only pray for mercy.

          • Gonzo Says:

            Yawn. So unimaginative and unoriginal.
            The “Oh yeah, history of America, white ppl are mean, blacks, Indians, blah, blah, blah” retort is quite old. I love how muslims always resort to name calling, and the institution of argument fallacies of redirection and red herrings. Just like in our last exchange. Kindly stay on topic. Otherwise, you simply come across as a child spanked.

          • tgusa Says:

            Muslims hate us because we have a fierce aversion to being enslaved. Black Americans are angry at whites cause we make them look bad in comparison. It takes more than just color to be one of us. BTW. Muslims use blacks as they always have, its easy as many Negros are just plain stupid. We know, that you know , that you will never enslave the world unless you get rid of the dreaded whitey. Its perfectly obvious and well it should be. Of course, as you know, we are not going anywhere, but you may be if you keep it up. Over 150 years ago Blacks willing to become slaves in America were better treated than women in any muslim country today. Two uninvolved US officers were gunned down in Flintstan by an afghan cop (Cop-WTF?) because of your idol, a book. Muslims always take their anger and aggression out on those that they can get away with it with. Come and get the rest of us, we’ll take you five on one and still open up a giant can of whoopass on ya maggots. And if you coreligionists don’t leave our women alone and unmolested we will cut off your damn *****, You can be sure it wont be no pissin contest.

            Many blacks ended up in America because muslims thought it easier to kidnap enslave and sell other people instead of actually working for what the have or desire.

          • 1MuslimUmmah Says:

            no reply necessary. uve made a fool of urself well enough here. man this is easy.

          • tgusa Says:

            If I had made a fool of myself you would not be responding, man, this is easy.

          • Gonzo Says:

            1muslim, your argument that a white person wearing kkk outfit walking through an all black neighborhood has zero bearing in this case.

            1) This country has a freedom of speech law. Words, (spoken or on a sign), is not reason to physically attack someone, even if it insults their religion.

            2) This parade was in America, not in Pakistan where one would expect the kind of response the atheist got.

            3) No one is saying all judges are trying implement sharia. However, by virtue of this judges commentary at the ruling, it is obvious that sharia was considered in the case, and in should not have been. This very much makes any commentary about anti-sharia laws in America as being relevant.

            I could retort your off topic comments about racism in America with commentary about history of slavery in islam (and the 25 million killed by islam in the slave trade), those who live as dhimmi’s in middle-east, and injustices that occur because of islam, but that would be too easy. You really want to walk down that road with me?


  10. Well then 1muslim we can agree that we are all biased. We are biased against your theocratic system and you are biased against us because of our comments and unbelief in your prophet, god and dahwah.

  11. Others thoughts on this story.

    Penn Judge Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad
    ..By Mark Whittington
    Yahoo! Contributor Network – Fri, Feb 24, 2012..;_ylt=AubRR70Uqq1Vm5zPF0RAJq7Nt.d_;_ylu=X3oDMTRzaDltbjJkBGNjb2RlA2N0LmMEbWl0A0FydGljbGUgTW9zdCBQb3B1bGFyBHBrZwM5MDMxNGYyZC1hYTkwLTM3YWMtOTE2Yy1hZTI0ZmRhYzViMjYEcG9zAzEEc2VjA01lZGlhQkxpc3RNaXhlZE1vc3RQb3B1bGFyQ0EEdmVyA2Q4NDdiOWYwLTVmMmEtMTFlMS1iZjJkLWY3YTQ1YzM3MGU1YQ–;_ylg=X3oDMTNodmV1ZnBpBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDZTBmZDRkNzItM2YzOC0zMzVjLWE3ZGEtMmQwYzM2YmYyZjBiBHBzdGNhdANwb2xpdGljc3xkZXN0aW5hdGlvbjIwMTIEcHQDc3RvcnlwYWdlBHRlc3QD;_ylv=3

    IF this judge is going to make a series of judgements FOR moslems than he needs to be investigated and removed from politics and law. Because he doesnt stand for Americas law system he stands up for moslems and sharia.

  12. Big Frank Says:

    A real judge would have applied the law without bias or favor, or in a more serious case remove himself and insist on a change of venue or a judge from another district, thus removing all questions as to partiality or bias.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: