Lexington KY: Privately Owned Christian T-Shirt Company Under Attack By Queers, Libtards, and Lawyers for Refusing to Print Rump-Rider T-Shirts

Welcome to Obama’s America where Christian beliefs are attacked and condemned while  sexual and moral turpitude is lauded on high:

Gay Rights Group Files Human Rights Complaint Against T-Shirt Company

By Todd StarnesFOX News

A Lexington, KY t-shirt company is under investigation by the city’s Human Rights Commission after they refused to print t-shirts for a local gay rights organization.

The owner of “Hands On Originals,” a well-known t-shirt company in the region, declined to print the shirts for the city’s Gay and Lesbian Services Organization (GLSO) because it would conflict with their Christian convictions.

Hmm…  Does anyone else suspect that this was a setup from the get-go?  Think about it.  Out of all the other T-shirt companies operating in and around the Lexington area, the one openly Christian T-shirt company is “magically” singled out by a bunch of Rump-Riders for use in the production of their newest fashion wear…  C’mon!   Only a faglodyte moron would make that mistake.  That is, unless…this was all a setup by the Butt-Humpers.

I’ll go with the latter.

The privately owned company is now accused of violating Lexington’s Fairness Act – which protects people and organizations from discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

The attacks are out of line, said Jim Campbell, an attorney with Alliance Defense Fund, the organization representing “Hands On Originals.”

“No business owner should be forced to violate his conscience simply because someone demands it,” he said. “The Constitution absolutely supports the rights of business owners to decline a request to support a message that conflicts with their deeply held convictions.”

[…]

On the other hand, there’s nothing in the U.S. Constitution supporting the rights of rump-riders to ram their perversity down our unwilling throats.   But, since when has the Left ever actually let a little thing like the U.S. Constitution stop them from pushing their fatuously debasing agenda?

Now, you would think that Lexington’s mayor surely must be a champion of religious rights in this Bible-beltish city, right?   Well…  Think again:

Even Lexington’s openly gay mayor has condemned the privately-owned t-shirt company, telling the Lexington Herald-Leader “People don’t have patience for this sort of attitude today.”

I’m against discrimination, period,” Gray said in a statement released to television station WKYT. “It’s bad for business and bad for the city. I support the Human Rights Commission in a full and thorough investigation.”

[…]

The hypocrisy runs deep with Mayor gay Gray.  Let me rephrase that for his queerness:  “I’m against discrimination, so long as those damn, dirty Christians toe my fag line!  After that, all bets are off!” 

Explore posts in the same categories: Abuse of Power, Christians, Christians under attack, Gay Agenda, Religion

21 Comments on “Lexington KY: Privately Owned Christian T-Shirt Company Under Attack By Queers, Libtards, and Lawyers for Refusing to Print Rump-Rider T-Shirts”

  1. tgusa Says:

    The queer is primarily an American phenomenon and it will die out once America is fundamentally changed. Most of the world will kill people for this kind of behavior and it looks like the queers will eventually get everything they are asking for, sucks to be them. I believe homosexuality is brought on by really ugly women, like Butch Napolitano, the Hildabeast, Kagan the pagan, etc etc. Its enough to turn a democrat queer. It is not a coincidence that the rise of homosexuality tracks right along with really disgusting women entering politics. They will say that queers were born that way but really, wouldn’t you too? The jihadists roll over these fools like a tiny speed bump.

  2. tgusa Says:

    If I were the devil…Id just keep on doing just what I was doing. I am beginning to believe that America is under some sort of satanic curse. I don’t know why, its just a feeling.

  3. tgusa Says:

    Get them Christians out! Lets see what occurs to democrat groups when jihadists take control.
    Womenists = No rights whatsoever/Death by stoning.
    Homosexualists = Forcibly raped/Death by stoning.
    Afrocentrists = Slavery/Death by stoning.
    Hispanics = Well, given the growth of islamists south of the border I would have to say…they’re allies/Death by stoning.
    Jews = See; Hitler/Nazism.
    Entertainists = The more jihadists the less we have to put up with entertainists. I cant decide if that is a plus or a minus. When in doubt/ Death by stoning (entertainers make excellent examples).
    Greenists = See; World map, note brown areas devoid of wildlife. /Death by stoning.
    Atheists = Death by stoning/Crucifixion.
    New Yorkers = Death by stoning/ Buried alive.

    The one nice thing about being a white male Christian is at least islamists consider us human. Just like democrats will say, the white guys always get special treatment.

    • Big Frank Says:

      I agree it’s one more assault on Christianity by the left using the ‘practitioners of a sick and perverse lifestyle’ to create more anti Christian bias,hatred and disdain.

  4. islams not for me Says:

    In the DVD “For my wife” Gloria Steinham in a interview willingly told the camera crew that the leftist / prohomosexual activists should use lawsuits (and violence) to promote thier agenda.

    And this isnt the only lawsuit by the leftards…

    “Gay student sues Ohio school district over T-shirt”
    “By LISA CORNWELL | Associated Press – 4 hrs ago..”
    “04-03-2012”

    http://news.yahoo.com/gay-student-sues-ohio-school-district-over-t-201525784.html

    As Christians we should be getting ready to defend ourselves in the courts and the streets as necessary.

    • Big Frank Says:

      I agree there is a very strong movement against Christianity, it’s basically a vile and hateful propaganda campaign by the socialists and the lunatic left. Their dependency on the government is their religion, these Godless freaks of no faith think that the individual is incapable of governing, thinking, or caring for themselves.

  5. islams not for me Says:

    Its pretty clear from the news website of KY… That the “Hands On Originals” comp… Changed thier mind about making tshirts or anything else for the gays.

    Heres a variety of news stories Ive collected about this subject.

    Tom Eblen: In T-shirt discrimination controversy, Hands on Originals could draw lessons from history
    By Tom Eblen — Herald-Leader columnist
    Posted: 12:00am on Apr 1, 2012; Modified: 7:37am on Apr 1, 2012

    http://www.kentucky.com/2012/04/01/2134901/tom-eblen-in-t-shirt-discrimination.html#storylink=misearch

    Its pretty typical to use the “equal rights” history of the American black to try ot build a case for sodomy & lesbian rights…

    Hands On Originals T-shirt company accused of discrimination
    By Scott Sloan — ssloan@herald-leader.com
    Posted: 5:10pm on Mar 26, 2012; Modified: 1:46am on Apr 1, 2012

    http://www.kentucky.com/2012/03/26/2127245/hands-on-originals-t-shirt-company.html#storylink=misearch

    Protest of Hands On Originals draws about 60
    By Scott Sloan — ssloan@herald-leader.com
    Posted: 4:14pm on Mar 30, 2012; Modified: 1:46am on Apr 1, 2012

    http://www.kentucky.com/2012/03/30/2132733/protest-of-hands-on-originals.html#storylink=misearch

    And lastly… A printed response to the progay crowd of Lexington from the business owner.

    Ky. Voices: Respect my right to follow my conscience
    By Blaine Adamson Posted: 12:00am on Apr 1, 2012; Modified: 10:43am on Apr 1, 2012

    http://www.kentucky.com/2012/04/01/2134883/ky-voices-respect-my-right-to.html#storylink=misearch

    Just goes to show ya. You cant change your mind in KY to not do business with the libtarded gays.

  6. tgusa Says:

    White homosexuals, the 99 percent are claiming civil rights comparisons? I suppose they do this because they get away with it. Black guys will tell you that if you want to hide something from a black men put it in a book, they’ll never find it there. Homosexuality is primarily a western white male disease. The numbers just don’t stand up internationally. As we all know the best thing to do in a situation like this is to piss off the people around you.

    Leftists are an Idiocracy. They talk like fags and their ****s retarded. In their future the most popular movie is, Ass, and that’s all it is, for 90 minutes.

    • Pete Says:

      Despite what your religion teaches (and you have every right living in the US to believe it) homosexuality is NOT a western white male disease. Cancer, diabetes, various STD’s, alzheimers and PKD (polycystic kidney disease) are all and many many more are diseases. Homosexuality is genetic and not a disease.

      “As a result of Hooker’s finding, the APA (American
      Psychological Association) removed homosexuality from its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychological Disorders in 1973.  In 1975 it then released a public statement that homosexuality was not a mental disorder.  In 1994, two decades later, the APA finally stated, “…homosexuality is neither a mental illness nor a moral depravity.  It is the way a portion of the population expresses human love and sexuality” [2]. ” “Another line of testing done to support the biological perspective are neuroendocrine studies.  The neuroendocrine viewpoint’s basic hypothesis is that sexual orientation is determined by the early levels (probably prenatal) of androgen on relevant neural structures [7].   If highly exposed to these androgens, the fetus will become masculinized, or attracted to females.”

      Also it is not limited to white western males. Did you know Hinduism, Buddhism and Confucianism have no proscriptions against homosexuality? Combined the adherents of all 3 religions outnumber moslems and also out number christians. Since retiring I’ve traveled around the world, I minored in college in world history and I want to see the places I’ve read about. My wife calls me a museum junkie and I tend at times to call her a shopaholic. Homosexuality is found on all continents and in all civilizations all throughout history. Only Judaism proscribed penalties (death) for homosexuals, even ancient arabs (who were polytheists) accepted homosexuality as normal – then came mohammed and his cult of violence destruction and death.

      Now as far as the problem of this t-shirt company, does anyone believe just for a second that anyone except the ACLU would care if this company rejected printing a moslem groups slogan that said,
      ” Death to Obama – Death to America – Down with democracy – Sharia law will rule America. Allah achbar”.

      This is without a doubt PC gone crazy, of course the company has the right to refuse to print anything they feel is offensive, just like the above example of the moslem group would be offensive.

      Also did you know that New York City was the capital of American slavery for 2 centuries?

      http://www.slaveryinnewyork.org/about_exhibit.htm

      • tgusa Says:

        I have never had any church tell me anything regarding homosexuality, it just wasn’t part of the sermon. Yes modern Doctors have changed their minds but I haven’t. As my Mother used to say, just because someone jumps off a bridge that doesn’t mean you have to do it too. From what I have witnessed homosexuality seems to come from a couple of main issues. One, the inability to obtain female companionship, for whatever reason. Two, men who have a unusually high desire for sexual relations and are willing to go to any length to fulfill them. That’s one reason why serial killings always turn out to be sexually related crimes. Most heterosexuals enjoy sex but it is not what defines them it is not the all ewncompasing dominant pursuit, it is part of the entire package. We aren’t looking for it in the public bathroom. But of course I am not hunting around for them and protesting them. I just want homosexuals to come up with their own version of unions not try to hijack others. But as you say you support people practicing their religion.
        You know Pete, when you don’t make assumptions people tend to take you at face value, when you do, they don’t.

        I’m not surprised about New York as the major city there NYC has a long and notorious history of racism. New Yorkers even rioted over the Civil War draft.

        I’ll tell you what, I wont call it a disease anymore Ill call it an affliction instead.

      • tgusa Says:

        Plenty of cases of white slavery too, it was called indentured servitude. We never hear any of their descendants whining about it, perhaps that’s because they are white. Of course everyone knows that black slaves just materialized in America right? The international slave trade has been minimalised to the point where only the American purchase of black slaves is brought up when discussing it. I’m a little tired of America getting attacked for black slavery. I do consider it a sort of cancer and it has allowed enemies of America to drag it out and use it at every opportunity. Hitler said that America was a nation of Jews and Negros, that wasn’t a diss on Jews and Negros that was a diss on Americans who were not one of those two groups. Slavery existed when the British ruled America and the fact that the Civil War occurred but one lifetime after the establishment of the Constitution I would have to say that a certain amount of animosity existed even as far back as the Revolutionary years.

        Here is a modern question, are there any groups in America today that the overwhelming majority of black democrats don’t dislike? How many young people are you willing to allow be smeared as rapists or murderers? How many have to fear being sent to prison for crimes that never occurred as a result of the old black democrats ministry of hate? How many young couples have to be torture murdered in the cruelest of fashions? The main reason we are talking about slavery some 150 years after the Civil War is the result of black failure. Hundreds of years ago New York had slavery. Toady black democrats what them dirty Asians out of their city. Really, have you no shame?

        If you want to have an honest debate about slavery I’m in but it will have to include a lot more than just Americas role in that

        • Pete Says:

          I am neither a dumocrat or a repusakin, I firmly believe the RNC and the DNC should be labeled domestic terrorist organizations and their members arrested and jailed for what they have done to the people of the US. I am an independent. After reading your posts unfortunately I erroneously made some assumptions about you. It is hard to know someone only through their posts. I’ll try harder in the future not to make assumptions.

          Islam and the slave trade, what the PC press does not want you to know –

          Africans,11 million African slaves were shipped across the Atlantic, 25 million Africans were sold to the slave markets in Islamic nations of North Africa and the Middle East. It is estimated that for every 1 slave who survived jihad, capture and transport, 3 died. Therefore for 25 million African slaves who survived, about 75 million did not, as opposed to about 10% who died crossing the Atlantic. Muslims ran all the wholesale slave trade in Africa.

          Blacks as Islam’s Molested Children-
          Let’s run down the generally accepted history of race in the U.S. White men captured Africans, then brought them to the U.S. and sold them as slaves.
          WRONG: when the white slavers showed up on the west coast of Africa, they didn’t capture Africans. They looked them over in the pens, gave the African slave traders their money, got their bills of sale, and loaded their purchases into boats. The English, French, Dutch, and Portuguese were far more involved in the black slave trade then the US.

          The African slave traders were Muslims. Their ancestors had been plying the trade of war, capture, enslavement, and sale for a thousand years. Mohammed was a slave trader. Long after the white slave traders quit, the Muslims continued their African slave trade up into the 21st century.

          Sacred Slavery
          Islam is so very clear about slavery. The Arab has many words for slave. But he has only one word for blacks- abid. The word serves for both black slave and African. Islam has another word for white slaves-mamluk. Arabic has more words for slaves than any other language.

          Mohammed was a slave trader, and the survivors of jihad were war booty. The Hadith contains a full legal and philosophic system of slavery. The Hadith have many sacred examples of how the slaves were traded and what was done with the children, women (frequently raped), and men who survived. Muslims took slaves from all cultures.

          Slavery was taken for granted throughout Islamic history, as it was, of course, in the West as well up until relatively recent times. Yet while the European and American slave trade get stern treatment attention from historians (as well as from reparations advocates and guilt-ridden politicians), the Islamic slave trade, which actually lasted longer and brought suffering to a larger number of people, is virtually ignored. (This fact magnifies the irony of Islam being presented to American blacks as the egalitarian alternative to the “white man’s slave religion” of Christianity.)

          A puzzling question comes to mind, however, why does the Arab world have no corresponding Black population as is found in the New World? Lewis provides an answer, ‘One reason is obviously the high population of eunuchs among Black males entering the Islamic lands. Another is the high death rate and low birth rate among Black slaves in North Africa and the Middle East. In about 1810, Louis Frank observed in Tunisia that most Black children died in infancy and that infinitesimally few reached the age of manhood. A British observer in Egypt, some thirty years later, found conditions even worse. He said, ‘I have heard it estimated that five or six years are sufficient to carry off a generation of slaves, at the end of which time the whole has to be replenished’.

          The moslems of north Africa also raided as far north as England for white slaves, Spain, France, Italy and the Balkans were all raided for white slaves.
          The institution of slavery regrettably existed both in the old, classical Christian and Islamic civilizations. Yet it is to the credit of Christianity that the abolition movement took root in Great Britain, Western Europe, and the United States and brought an end to this buying and selling of human beings. Yet even today slavery exists in the moslem world.

          Christians – 60 million; 9 million “martyred” by the “religion of peace” and 50 million more by jihad of the “religion of peace. Recently 1 million more African Christians have been murdered in the name of Islam.
          Hindus – 80 million; Killed in the total jihad against India. “The country of India today is only half the size of ancient India, due to jihad.”
          Buddhists –10 million; “Islamic jihad killed the Buddhists in Turkey, Afghanistan, along the Silk Route, and in India.”
          Jews – All; The jihad in Arabia was 100 percent effective.

          Is there any question why I call islam a cult of violence, destruction and death?

          I am absolutely amazed and baffled by how many blacks support the democratic party, it is if the whole history of what the democrats did to the black people has been erased from their collective memory-

          The DNC Web site section labeled “Party History,” linked here, is in fact scrubbed clean of the not-so-little dirty secret that fueled Democrats’ political successes for over a century and a half and made American life a hell on earth for black Americans.

          There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were six from 1840 through 1860.
          There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who owned slaves. There were seven from 1800 through 1861
          There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms that either supported segregation outright or were silent on the subject. There were 20, from 1868 through 1948.
          There is no reference to “Jim Crow” as in “Jim Crow laws,” nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them.
          There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, which, according to Columbia University historian Eric Foner, became “a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party.” Nor is there reference to University of North Carolina historian Allen Trelease’s description of the Klan as the “terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.”
          There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution.
          Last but certainly not least, there is no reference to the fact that Birmingham, Ala., Public Safety Commissioner Bull Connor, who infamously unleashed dogs and fire hoses on civil rights protestors, was in fact–yes indeed–a member of both the Democratic National Committee and the Ku Klux Klan.

          • tgusa Says:

            Nice job.

          • tgusa Says:

            The time of the ending of the Revolutionary War 1776 the British were a well established sea power and yet they knew next to nothing about the continent of Africa. Now we didn’t even establish our Constitution until 1789. America was a fledgling nation at that time and barely able to deal with its own internal issues. In spite of this there were even then anti slavery Americans. The British, in 1796 commissioned a guy named Park to explore the interior of Africa but it wasn’t until 1852 that the famous Dr David Livingstone went deep into the continent on a mission to expose the slave trade.

            I suppose there could have been other Europeans that tried to explore Africa but none of them came back alive so we never heard about them. Africa was referred to as the Dark Continent, not as any racial undertone as no doubt many officials might say, but because there was a shroud of darkness over the continent. Nobody from the outside had any idea what was going on in there, had been for centuries in fact. It was dangerous to even approach the continent what with muslim pirates all over the place.

          • tgusa Says:

            the ending of the Revolutionary War 1783.

  7. tgusa Says:

    Leftists like to frame the argument around civil rights. The fact is a majority of states never allowed slavery at all. The 15th Amendment came about in 1870. Civil rights were in reality the right to live and work among the white society that blacks were being excluded from but this was only occurring in a few places. Of course the left likes to make out that the entire USA is racist in spite of the fact that states were voting against slavery even before the Civil War. Of course America has changed since 1800s, large numbers of immigrants from all over the world have come here since then. So the lefts argument is that all these people came here to hate on the black man, sounds like a winner. To the contrary 150 years later we have seen states, liberal states, vote against the homosexual agenda. Gay card, rejected.

    The left is really deranged. Everyone was included and yet in the 1960s they marched to be included, and then they decided they didn’t want to be included and now they want us to think that we are denying them the inclusion that they didn’t want yet already had.

    • Big Frank Says:

      There have been a few books written on the mental order of liberalism by highly regarded and renowned members of the psychiatric profession.

  8. tgusa Says:

    Smokin in the boys room. Diverse group of openly gay men having sex in a Manhattan Beach bathroom are busted by lifeguards/police. Paint me un- surprised. And I thought beach bathrooms smelt bad when homos were not stinking up the place, I can’t imagine.
    KTLA.com.

  9. Pete Says:

    @ tgusa

    The next time someone bad mouths the US because of slavery refer them here

    http://vernondent.blogspot.com/2005/05/french-slavery.html

    Another interesting article

    http://www.slavenorth.com/index.html

    Which shows that even though slavery in the US was bad it was no where near as bad or last as long, nor was there the numbers of slaves nor did they experience the cruelties that the European countries in their new world colonies inflicted on the Africans unfortunate to be slaves.

  10. blussJesus1 Says:

    Who cares what the devilsthink, Jesus Christ has the authority, where his name is used. Just tell the devils, “I reserve the right to refuse service to anyone I may choose, in Jesus’ name, amen!”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: