Eric Holder Not Legally Attorney General?

This is a copy of the information Private Attorney General Paul Mitchell provided to Sheriff Arpiao last week.  It’s kind of like that movie, “The Usual Suspects,” where at the end of the movie, the detective starts looking at all the pictures and clues in his office and suddenly it all starts coming together:  Obama and his cronies are all illegal:

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell  Greetings Sheriff Arpaio, Deputy Sheriffs and All Staff:

Please allow us to itemize for your official consideration a small sampling of reasons why the U.S. Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security are corrupt and motivated to retaliate corruptly against your office:

(1)  our ongoing investigation of missing credentials required of all Federal government officers has confirmed that counterfeit OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS are circulating widely among recently hired Federal “employees”; see 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/3331.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2903.html

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#DAZ

(2)  that “bootleg” form is a counterfeit because it lacks the OMB control number that is absolutely required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (“PRA”); it also lacks the paragraph at the bottom which cites 5 U.S.C. 2903 supra defining the persons who are authorized to administer Standard Form 61 (“SF-61″); in such cases, the Public Protection Clause of that PRA is rather explicit:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/44/3512.html  (b)

(b) The protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a complete defense, bar, or otherwise at any time during the agency administrative process or judicial action applicable thereto.

(3)  in line with our ongoing investigation described above, you are hereby formally notified that the SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for Eric H. Holder, Jr. are also fatally defective, for the same reasons:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.refused.JPG

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affidavit.GIF

Here are our original Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Requests for Holder’s SF-61:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/foia.request.holder.opm.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/foia.request.holder.htm

In addition to the counterfeit credential above, the related correspondence we received is archived here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-04-28/page01.GIF
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-04-28/page02.GIF

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/page01.GIF

Accordingly, the existence of valid credentials for Eric H. Holder, Jr. assumes facts not in evidence and, therefore, he is not and cannot be a duly authorized Attorney General of the United States, nor can he as such delegate any authority to any subordinates within DOJ.

(Frankly, I have more authority than he does at present. See 18 U.S.C. 1964;  Rotella v. Wood.)

(4)  Janet Napolitano has already been charged with multiple Federal offenses in connection with a Federal Grand Jury “subpoena” which the late U.S. District Judge John M. Roll authorized my office to litigate in defense of the Arizona trust which had been served with same:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/predicate.acts.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/roll/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/roll/nadappea.htm#napolitano1512
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/roll/nadappea.htm#napolitano1510

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/azvmitch/crossco4.htm

[begin excerpt]

Ms. Janet Napolitano with:

(1)  aiding  and   abetting  the  obstruction  of  correspondence transmitted  via  first  class,  certified,  and  registered United States  mail, under  color of law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702 (twenty-five (25) counts);

(2)  aiding and  abetting the  act of  tampering with  a  federal grand jury,  in violation  of 18  U.S.C. 2 and 1512 (twenty-five (25) counts);

(3)  aiding and  abetting obstruction of criminal investigations, in violation  of 18  U.S.C. 2  and  1510  (twenty-five  (25) counts);

(4)  deprivation  of  fundamental  Rights  under  color  of  law, specifically the  Right  to  Petition  a  lawfully  convened federal grand  jury for a formal investigation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (twenty-five (25) counts);

(5)  conspiracy to  commit all  of the  above, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371 (twenty-five (25) counts);

(6)  impersonating an  officer of the United States, in violation of 5 U.S.C. 3331 and 18 U.S.C. 912 (one (1) count each).

[end excerpt]

We also have reasons strongly to suspect that Ms. Napolitano was also complicit for failing to do anything but obstruct and stonewall our part-time investigation into the
whereabouts of 2,500 missing children — and young adults — who had reportedly “disappeared” into Arizona’s Child Protective Services:

http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/kidnaps.htm
(cf. 42 U.S.C. 1986:  action for neglect to prevent and/or failure to remedy)

(5)  lastly, and arguably of equal or greater severity, for many years DOJ has been commencing ALL civil and criminal lawsuits in the U.S. District Courts on behalf of one or the other of 2 defunct Delaware corporations named “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” [sic];  when we brought this fact to the attention of the Delaware Secretary of State, both corporate charters were promptly REVOKED!

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif

We recommend that you make official contact with the Arizona Secretary of State to confirm that neither defunct corporation has ever registered to do business inside the State of Arizona, as we have already confirmed with the Secretaries of State for California and several other large States of the Union:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/  (e.g. New York State = the heart of “The Conspiracy”)

We elaborate the all important differences between the “United States” and the “United States of America” here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
(read “NOT a corporation”:  U.S. v. Cooper Corp.)

If we can be of any further assistance to your offices in this matter, please direct one of your capable Staff to initiate contact with me here, via email, and we can take it from there.

We are standing by, Sheriff Arpaio.

Paul Andrew Mitchell
Bcc:  Arizona Attorney General, Crime, Fraud and Victim Resource Center

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

 

Explore posts in the same categories: Abuse of Power, Justice System, Obama Sucks, politics

3 Comments on “Eric Holder Not Legally Attorney General?”


  1. […] Original Page: https://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/eric-holder-not-legally-attorney-general/ Related Stories Did Obama Just Commit High Treason?!? BRAVE NEW WORLD 2009 You vote obama […]

  2. Big Frank Says:

    The entire regime of our ‘Dear Leader’ is bogus.

  3. blog Says:

    Hello to every one, for the reason that I am truly keen of reading this weblog’s post to be updated daily.
    It carries pleasant information.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: