Eric Holder Not Legally Attorney General?
This is a copy of the information Private Attorney General Paul Mitchell provided to Sheriff Arpiao last week. It’s kind of like that movie, “The Usual Suspects,” where at the end of the movie, the detective starts looking at all the pictures and clues in his office and suddenly it all starts coming together: Obama and his cronies are all illegal:
Paul Andrew Mitchell Greetings Sheriff Arpaio, Deputy Sheriffs and All Staff:
Please allow us to itemize for your official consideration a small sampling of reasons why the U.S. Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security are corrupt and motivated to retaliate corruptly against your office:
(1) our ongoing investigation of missing credentials required of all Federal government officers has confirmed that counterfeit OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS are circulating widely among recently hired Federal “employees”; see 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331:
(2) that “bootleg” form is a counterfeit because it lacks the OMB control number that is absolutely required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (“PRA”); it also lacks the paragraph at the bottom which cites 5 U.S.C. 2903 supra defining the persons who are authorized to administer Standard Form 61 (“SF-61″); in such cases, the Public Protection Clause of that PRA is rather explicit:
(b) The protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a complete defense, bar, or otherwise at any time during the agency administrative process or judicial action applicable thereto.
(3) in line with our ongoing investigation described above, you are hereby formally notified that the SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for Eric H. Holder, Jr. are also fatally defective, for the same reasons:
Here are our original Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Requests for Holder’s SF-61:
In addition to the counterfeit credential above, the related correspondence we received is archived here:
Accordingly, the existence of valid credentials for Eric H. Holder, Jr. assumes facts not in evidence and, therefore, he is not and cannot be a duly authorized Attorney General of the United States, nor can he as such delegate any authority to any subordinates within DOJ.
(Frankly, I have more authority than he does at present. See 18 U.S.C. 1964; Rotella v. Wood.)
(4) Janet Napolitano has already been charged with multiple Federal offenses in connection with a Federal Grand Jury “subpoena” which the late U.S. District Judge John M. Roll authorized my office to litigate in defense of the Arizona trust which had been served with same:
Ms. Janet Napolitano with:
(1) aiding and abetting the obstruction of correspondence transmitted via first class, certified, and registered United States mail, under color of law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1702 (twenty-five (25) counts);
(2) aiding and abetting the act of tampering with a federal grand jury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1512 (twenty-five (25) counts);
(3) aiding and abetting obstruction of criminal investigations, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510 (twenty-five (25) counts);
(4) deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of law, specifically the Right to Petition a lawfully convened federal grand jury for a formal investigation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (twenty-five (25) counts);
(5) conspiracy to commit all of the above, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 371 (twenty-five (25) counts);
(6) impersonating an officer of the United States, in violation of 5 U.S.C. 3331 and 18 U.S.C. 912 (one (1) count each).
We also have reasons strongly to suspect that Ms. Napolitano was also complicit for failing to do anything but obstruct and stonewall our part-time investigation into the
whereabouts of 2,500 missing children — and young adults — who had reportedly “disappeared” into Arizona’s Child Protective Services:
(cf. 42 U.S.C. 1986: action for neglect to prevent and/or failure to remedy)
(5) lastly, and arguably of equal or greater severity, for many years DOJ has been commencing ALL civil and criminal lawsuits in the U.S. District Courts on behalf of one or the other of 2 defunct Delaware corporations named “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” [sic]; when we brought this fact to the attention of the Delaware Secretary of State, both corporate charters were promptly REVOKED!
We recommend that you make official contact with the Arizona Secretary of State to confirm that neither defunct corporation has ever registered to do business inside the State of Arizona, as we have already confirmed with the Secretaries of State for California and several other large States of the Union:
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/ (e.g. New York State = the heart of “The Conspiracy”)
We elaborate the all important differences between the “United States” and the “United States of America” here:
(read “NOT a corporation”: U.S. v. Cooper Corp.)
If we can be of any further assistance to your offices in this matter, please direct one of your capable Staff to initiate contact with me here, via email, and we can take it from there.
We are standing by, Sheriff Arpaio.
Paul Andrew Mitchell
Bcc: Arizona Attorney General, Crime, Fraud and Victim Resource Center
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
Explore posts in the same categories: Abuse of Power, Justice System, Obama Sucks, politics