Archive for the ‘Conspiracy Theories’ category

Vatican Website Going Islamic? – UPDATED

11 February, 2013

Okay, this morning when I heard about Pope Benedict resigning, I immediately went to the Vatican’s website to read their press release.  Imagine my surprise when I was greeted with what appears to be a crescent moon with the Pope as the star:

Vatican Website Crescent

Is it just me, or do you see it, too?

UPDATE:  Here’s the Vatican’s website as it appeared on June 4th, 2011:

Vatican June 2011Nope.  Not quite crescent enough to trigger my tin-foil hat senses at that time.  However, with the addition of the yellow glow and the removal of the circular icons inside the broken circle in the newer version, it subliminally suggests a crescent moon and star…


Official INS Documents: Native Born Does Not Equal Natural Born!

27 January, 2012

Hmm…  No wonder Obama’s defunct website “fightthesmears” (now, Attack Waaaatch!!! ) claimed only that Obama was a “native citizen of the United States” and not a natural born citizen:

The Current INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation Between Natural-Born and Native-Born. – Leo Donofrio

I was just made privy to a very important piece of research I had not previously been aware of. It comes by way of a comment forwarded to me by the author of the h2ooflife blog:

“I had presumed that the idiom “natural born citizen” appeared nowhere in U.S. Law other than A2S1C5, but I found it in administrative law and it is contrasted with native and naturalized citizenship. I’ve never seen any mention of this fact before and wonder how many are aware of it in the ineligibility camp. Here’s the quotes:

He then quoted two provisions from the link provided, but there’s actually three at the official INS “.gov” site which establish official recognition by the federal government that native-born and natural-born should be separately delineated. When you visit the suggested link to the Immigration and Naturalization service, it brings you to “Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.”

Interpretation 324.2 (a)(3) provides:

“The repatriation provisions of these two most recent enactments also apply to a native- and natural-born citizen woman who expatriated herself by marriage to an alien…” (Emphasis added.)

Then, Interpretation 324.2(a)(7) provides:

“(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.

The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922″, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.” (Emphasis added.)

And again, Interpretation 324.2(b) provides:

“The effect of naturalization under the above statutes was not to erase the previous period of alienage, but to restore the person to the status if naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen, as determined by her status prior to loss.” (Emphasis added.)

Three times in this official INS Interpretation – currently published by the Obama Administration – native-born and natural-born are given separate consideration. And in the third example – from Interpretation 324.2(b) – the INS clearly states that each delineation, “naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen“, is a separate status.

The INS includes the following explanation of Interpretations:

“Interpretations were created to supplement and clarify the provisions of the statute and regulations as interpreted by the courts. These materials usually are not included in the regulations because they deal generally with procedural matters and do not deal directly with application and benefit requirements. They are still a useful tool to help you understand how the DHS Bureaus performs their different immigration services and enforcement functions. Users of the Operation Instructions and Interpretations should always consult the relevant regulations and manuals in conjunction with these materials. As the DHS Bureaus have grown, the trend has been towards inclusion of more materials in the regulations and field manuals, and the Operations Instructions and Interpretations have been updated less frequently.”

I am rather rocked by this find, having never seen it before, and it certainly comes to the attention of the nation at a critical moment […]

Read the rest of this article by CLICKING HERE

Sure Enough, New Emails Confirm That Operation ‘Fast & Furious’ Was About Implementing More Gun Control

8 December, 2011

Simply put, O’Bambi and Eric withHolder need to be jailed!:

Documents: ATF used “Fast and Furious” to make the case for gun regulations

By Sharyl Attkisson CBS News

Documents obtained by CBS News show that the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) discussed using their covert operation “Fast and Furious” to argue for controversial new rules about gun sales.

In Fast and Furious, ATF secretly encouraged gun dealers to sell to suspected traffickers for Mexican drug cartels to go after the “big fish.” But ATF whistleblowers told CBS News and Congress it was a dangerous practice called “gunwalking,” and it put thousands of weapons on the street. Many were used in violent crimes in Mexico. Two were found at the murder scene of a U.S. Border Patrol agent.

ATF officials didn’t intend to publicly disclose their own role in letting Mexican cartels obtain the weapons, but emails show they discussed using the sales, including sales encouraged by ATF, to justify a new gun regulation called “Demand Letter 3”. That would require some U.S. gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or “long guns.” Demand Letter 3 was so named because it would be the third ATF program demanding gun dealers report tracing information.

On July 14, 2010 after ATF headquarters in Washington D.C. received an update on Fast and Furious, ATF Field Ops Assistant Director Mark Chait emailed Bill Newell, ATF’s Phoenix Special Agent in Charge of Fast and Furious:

“Bill – can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same (licensed gun dealer) and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks.”

On Jan. 4, 2011, as ATF prepared a press conference to announce arrests in Fast and Furious, Newell saw it as “(A)nother time to address Multiple Sale on Long Guns issue.” And a day after the press conference, Chait emailed Newell: “Bill–well done yesterday… (I)n light of our request for Demand letter 3, this case could be a strong supporting factor if we can determine how many multiple sales of long guns occurred during the course of this case.”

This revelation angers gun rights advocates. Larry Keane, a spokesman for National Shooting Sports Foundation, a gun industry trade group, calls the discussion of Fast and Furious to argue for Demand Letter 3 “disappointing and ironic.” Keane says it’s “deeply troubling” if sales made by gun dealers “voluntarily cooperating with ATF’s flawed ‘Operation Fast & Furious’ were going to be used by some individuals within ATF to justify imposing a multiple sales reporting requirement for rifles.”


JustiaGate Investigation Broadens in Scope: Add Cornell University, LexisNexis, and to the List of Co-Conspirators

18 November, 2011

In case you were unaware of it, the term “JustiaGate” was made famous by Leo Donofrio, Esq.,  to describe the massive coverup of legal documents pertaining to Obama’s eligibility question.  For an excellent overview of JustiaGate, CLICK HERE.

Now, Leo Donofrio and several other researchers have uncovered even more evidence of tampering with SCOTUS rulings in an attempt to obfuscate Obama’s lack of eligibility under the Natural Born clause.  This time, it’s even more damning in that the so-called “gold standard” of legal and journalistic research and documentation on the internet, LexisNexis, obfuscates the issue by altering a reference to Minor v. Happersett in LOCKWOOD, EX PARTE, 154 U.S. 116 (1894) to instead read “Miner” v. Happersett.  This minor “typo” has caused many a researcher on LexisNexis to miss a vital clue in uncovering the mystery of what exactly a Natural Born citizen is.

And, just wait until you read what Cornell University and did to the content of the LOCKWOOD decision!  Coincidence or conspiracy?  You decide:

JustiaGate: Say It Aint So, Carl Malamud.
By Leo Donofrio – NaturalBornCitizen

Justia CEO Tim Stanley has a doppelgänger named Carl Malamud.  Back in 2007, Stanley blogged about Malamud as follows:

“Our friend & hero Carl Malamud stopped by the “Justia offices” to talk about his new public interest public information project…. making the case law and codes of the United States of America (state and federal) freely accessible in a public domain archive…This archived data can then be used and worked on by the folks at Cornell, Google, Stanford…. and everyone!

And Malamud made good on that promise.  Whereas, Justia is a private enterprise offering free legal research with all the modern bells and whistles of hyper-linking and Google analytics, is a barebones public domain which associates all of its case URL’s with “”.  Malamud’s use of “” is truly misleading in that it gives the appearance his site has a true governmental “seal of approval“, but it doesn’t.  Despite such icky behavior, Malamud has charmed a lot of people.

LawSites had this to say about him:

“I can barely keep up with the efforts of Carl Malamud and his to “liberate” government documents. (See 1.8M Pages of Federal Case Law to Go Public and More Government Docs to Go on Web.) The latest project: Recycle Your Used Pacer Documents!.”

The New York Times published a story entitled, “Score One For The Web’s Don Quixote“, about Malamud’s quixotic attempts to bring every US legal document public for free.  And Wired Magazine did a profile on Malamud which included this interesting bit of data:

” ‘West makes billions of dollars selling stuff we want to give away for free,’ Stanley boasts…

His company purchased and digitized all the Supreme Court decisions, put up the first free search engine for them, and donated them to  Now Justia’s working with Cornell University to throw some Web 2.0 tools into the mix, including wiki pages for decisions…”

(Keep that reference to Justia working with Cornell on your desktop, we’ll come back to it shortly.)  Tim Stanley is one of five on the Board of Directors of Malamud’s Public.Resource.Org.  And Justia is listed as top benefactor as well.

Together, it cannot be denied, the pair are the Robin Hood and Friar Tuck of the free government document movement.  Malamud was also very instrumental in helping Justia defeat Oregon’s copyright claim litigation.  His “Ten Rules For Radicals include:

“This is thus my second rule for radicals, and that is when the authorities finally fire that starting gun—and do something like send you tapes—run as fast as you can, so when they get that queasy feeling in their stomach and have second thoughts,  it is too late to stop.”

We shall see whether this alleged passion for open information and preservation is extended to a review of Malamus’ publication of public domain cases.  We do know that his sidekick, Tim Stanley, doesn’t believe such freedom of information principles should apply to Justia since he’s removed all prior versions of Justia’s entire body of US Supreme Court case-law from the Wayback Machine.  And in doing so, Stanley is guilty of the very thing Malamud warns about in his Rule #2 above.

I should also mention that Malamud was the Chief Technology Officer of the Center For American Progress, where he was also a fellow.  CFAP received $3 million from George Soros, and is run by John Podesta:

“Citing Podesta’s influence in the formation of the Obama Administration, a November 2008 article in Time stated that “not since the Heritage Foundation helped guide Ronald Reagan’s transition in 1981 has a single outside group held so much sway.”[4]


My second report on JustiaGate exposed the surgical scrubbing of Minor v. Happersett from 25 cases – at Justia’s Supreme Court Center – which cited the vital Supreme Court decision which classifies those born in the country to parents who are citizens as “natural-born citizens”, such classification excluding Obama from eligibility:

“At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”  Minor v. Happersett, 154 U.S. 116, 167 (1874).

Because Minor v. Happersett directly implies that Obama is not eligible – even assuming he was born in the US – the case has been the subject of an intense disinformation campaign across the web.  And until JustiaGate’s revelations, Obama supporters were more able to levy false attacks upon Minor, claiming it was a voting rights precedent, not a citizenship precedent, and that Minor was “disgraced” and overruled by the 19th Amendment.  But none of that was even remotely true.


WTF?!! – Obama’s Illegal, Drunk Uncle Had SSN and Valid Driver’s License – UPDATED

30 August, 2011

Does anyone else find it a bit too fortuitous that merely six days before Uncle Obama’s arrest, Nephew Obama halted all deportation proceedings for illegals in the U.S.? 

Hmmmm…  It’s almost as if Nephew Obama somehow knew beforehand, or something.  Or…he sent in his “plumbers” and had the reporting dates changed and the arraignment hearing postponed:

UPDATE:  The Washington Times sheds some light on Uncle Obama’s Social Security card:

A 1989 Associated Press article with the headline “Mass. Aliens Given Fake Social Security Numbers” describe how these numbers were released:  (bolding is mine)

Massachusetts welfare workers assigned hundreds of dummy Social Security numbers to illegal immigrants to enable them to receive millions of dollars in state benefits.Federal officials said Wednesday, there’s nothing illegal about it.  But Gov. Michael Dukakis says it’s got to stop because it goes against his new efforts to crack down on aid to illegal aliens, which he says the state can no longer afford.  The practice started after Dukakis issued a 1985 executive order barring state agencies from asking people applying for state services about their citizenship status.  But citizens or not, the computerized welfare records required a case identification number for each person, and that had to be a nine-digit number since for most people the ID is the same as their Social Security number.  Welfare spokeswoman Michal Regunberg said the department issued its own control numbers, which started with a three-digit prefix not used by the Social Security Administration. “

From there, it’s just a quick trip to the local Massachusetts’ motor vehicles licensing office to get a valid driver’s license.

President Obama’s uncle had Social Security ID
By Dave Wedge and Laurel J. Sweet
Tuesday, August 30, 2011 – Boston Herald

President Obama’s accused drunken-driving uncle — who was busted after a near collision with a Framingham cop — has had a valid Social Security number for at least 19 years, despite being an illegal immigrant ordered to be deported back to Kenya, the Herald has learned.

The president’s 67-year-old uncle, Obama Onyango, has had a valid Massachusetts driver’s license and Social Security number since at least 1992, said Registry of Motor Vehicles spokesman Michael Verseckes.

Onyango, whose sister, Zeituni Onyango, made headlines when it was revealed she was an illegal immigrant living in public housing in South Boston, was wobbly legged, “slurring” and had “red and glassy eyes” when he was pulled over at 7 p.m. Wednesday on Waverly Street in Framingham.

A marked cruiser pulled him over just past the Chicken Bone saloon, about a mile from Onyango’s single-family home. Onyango, the half-brother of the president’s father identified in some press accounts as “Uncle Omar,” initially denied drinking but admitted having “two beers” after police said they smelled booze on his breath, according to a police report.

“It was clear that he was moderately unsteady on his feet,” Framingham Officer Val Krishtal wrote.

Onyango’s white Mitsubishi SUV was pulled over after the vehicle made a sudden right turn in front of a cruiser at a stop sign, causing Krishtal to slam on the brakes to avoid a collision. Onyango blew a .14 on the Breathalyzer and continually interrupted the officer, the report states.

“(Onyango) spoke English well, albeit with a moderate accent. I detected what I believed to be some slurring as he spoke,” Krishtal wrote.

Onyango was ordered held without bail on a federal immigration warrant after his arraignment Thursday in Framingham District Court.  Court papers show he was the subject of a previous deportation order. He was being held in the Plymouth House of Correction last night.

Mike Rogers, a spokesman for Cleveland immigration attorney Margaret Wong, who is representing Onyango, said he “wouldn’t know how” Onyango obtained a Social Security number. Wong is the same lawyer who represented the president’s aunt, Zeituni Onyango, in her fight to win asylum last year. Reached at her apartment in a South Boston public housing complex yesterday, Zeituni Onyango said of her brother’s arrest: “Why don’t you go to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. in Washington, D.C., and ask your president? Not me.” She then hung up on a reporter.


Oslo Shooter/Bomber’s Facebook Page Hacked AFTER Attack to Blame Christian Conservatives?

25 July, 2011

VERY interesting.  It would appear that the Lame Stream Media doesn’t limit itself to just hacking cell phones, they hack Facebook pages to support their narrative.

Of course, considering that Breivik’s much touted “manifesto” was mostly a compendium and had whole sections cut & pasted from various online sources, this also puts into question the authenticity of his widely circulated “manifesto“:

Anders Behring Breivik: Manufacturing a Patsy?
Paul Joseph Watson
Monday, July 25, 2011

Given the fact that the establishment media got it spectacularly wrong by instantly jumping to the conclusion that Friday’s deadly attack in Norway was the work of Al-Qaeda Muslims, placing complete trust in the details emerging about gunman Anders Behring Breivik would be foolish, especially since there are innumerable inconsistencies and contradictions that need to be studied before a fuller picture of what motivated the bloodshed can be established.

The rush to blame Muslims for the carnage, hastily parroted by an onslaught of mainstream “terror experts,” was a startling insight into how the propaganda that fuels the war on terror is so unquestionably bounced around the echo chamber of the corporate media.

It’s also a reminder that the mainstream press instantly falls in line with whoever the establishment designates the enemy du jour to be at any given time. Now that Muslims have been so vehemently demonized as terrorists, it’s the turn of so called “right-wing extremists,” or anyone who disagrees with mass immigration, loss of sovereignty and globalist financial looting, to feel the heat.

The effort to smear European conservatives as unhinged radicals who harbor simmering urges for bloodlust is now in full swing, and it’s a demonization campaign firmly founded on the carefully crafted public portrayal of Anders Behring Breivik.

However, it’s quickly becoming apparent that just as many eyewitnesses reported two gunmen on the island where the rampage unfolded, there are two different personas behind Breivik himself.

Indeed, there are two different Facebook profiles for Breivik, one from before the massacre and one from after. The latter profile appears to have been embellished and deliberately altered to emphasize the notion that the gunman was motivated by his “Christian conservative” beliefs.

Compare the two profiles below (click to enlarge). The first one in Norwegian was deleted minutes after Breivik’s identity became public. The second profile in English appeared after the original was deleted, and became the de facto profile of the killer.


“Several things have been doctored up to alter the suspects political views. First a section titled “Philosophy” has been added to include “Christian,” and “Conservative.” The media has used this to great lengths,” notes the Council of Conservative Christians website.

In the second profile, Breivik’s interest in Winston Churchill and Max Manus, the leader of the Norwegian anti-Nazi resistance, have been deleted, presumably because they don’t fit with the psychological profile that Breivik was a right-wing neo-Nazi who had links with the English Defence League.

There was clearly manipulation surrounding Breivik’s Facebook page after the attack. As Madison Ruppert notes, “Someone was active on Breivik’s Facebook accepting friend requests after the massacre took place.” People were also tricked into registering on a fake Facebook page set up in support of the gunman’s actions.

Additionally, in a series of Internet postings, Breivik clearly characterizes himself not as a populist Christian conservative, as the media has attempted to push, but as a Bill Kristol style neo-con, an enthusiastic supporter of Israel, attacking racists and accusing others of being “anti-gay”.

“None of the comments are extreme or hint at a desire to commit violence,” notes the CCC website, adding that Breivik was a supporter of the website which was run by Hans Rustad, a former Jewish left-winger turned neo-conservative.

It seems as if there are two Breivik’s, the original, a socially liberal, pro-Israel neo-con, and the second post-massacre profile of a Christian conservative, white supremacist. The second profile has clearly been embellished to push the notion that Breivik’s rampage was driven by his Christian conservative beliefs, which is convenient given the fact that governments recently introduced the meme that white, Christian conservatives were the leading terror threat.


Hate the Haters

29 December, 2010

By Ronin, 29 Dec, 2010

Ideology, Religion, Race and Economic Status are among the main reasons that humanity has made killing itself into an art form. We can break that down a little bit more. Follow along with me. It is time to look in the global mirror.

Some groups want to topple governments to limit free will.
Some groups want to topple governments for individual freedom.
Some groups want to topple governments through force.
Some groups want to topple governments from inside.
Some groups want to rule over the lesser man.
Some groups want to enslave the white race to make up for what they see as past transgressions
Some groups want to kill everyone that does not follow their narrow world-view.
Some groups want to empower animals over man.
Some groups want to limit the numbers of humans allowed to live at any given time.
Some groups want to force man to worship a certain way
Some groups demand that man worship nothing.
Some groups hate because a deity demands blood.

And onward it goes. Need an excuse to kill? Pick one or be inventive and choose one of the hundreds of excuses to hate that I did not list.

What did all those widely divergent groups have in common? (more…)

If I were Paranoid

18 September, 2010

By Ronin, 18 Sep, 10
I noticed today that my article on koran burning gained me yet another veiled death threat. This one had a twist as it was from a muslim sorcerer, a fortune teller, one that claims to have been successful in the past. It seems as the author of the article my precious life might be once again in jeopardy.

With as many threats as we get around here and since I met my first members of the cult of the demented pedophile in the 80’s, I should indeed be paranoid.

Now what would a paranoid do in a place like Tampa Florida? I am retired military so I might consider building a network of like-minded patriots.

There is a base nearby. It includes a few major commands, all have plenty of combat veterans, many of which do not believe in their senior leaderships win their hearts and minds approach to answering the march of radical islam. As warriors and not REMF’s they might have a vastly different idea of what needs to be accomplished before Americans can sleep soundly.

Plenty of police have awakened, including public servants, social workers and even delivery people. All could be useful in watching, identifying and monitoring the enemies within.

The fortuneteller did not realize that in the nine years after 9-11 a real paranoid would have built such a network. A network of up and coming people to identity the muslims of note that live around him, the social leadership, religious leadership, even the little islamic darlings that stash their hajib’s once they are in school and show their wares to the boys. Such information gathered slowly over time could be useful. Heck, even sites like islamic finder, might help identify mosques, businesses, holidays and prayer times. Just sayin is all…. (more…)

Top Ten Signs that Aliens Have Already Landed on Earth

7 August, 2010

From our just for fun Dept. I have to admit that I do believe number 3, there is no way that nancy (the evil alien) pelosi is human. The rest are just for fun, enjoy.

By Matthew Stoker, 6 Aug 2010 (AP)
As any good conspiracy theory buff worth his or her salt will tell you, the federal government has been covering up the existence of alien space craft for decades. Recently, it was reported in the news that Winston Churchill, Britain’s famously brave prime minister who guided his country through World War 2, had covered up the existence of UFOs. A report of unexplained flying objects observed by a Royal Air Force pilot was quietly buried. Churchill believed that the existence of such craft would cause mass hysteria if the public knew the truth. Have aliens already made contact with world leaders? Ten pieces of evidence that they have are listed below.

1. Area 51 has been slowly expanding over the past couple decades despite the government insistence that nothing new is being built there. Insiders say that it is construction for a swimming pool and baseball diamond, but is this just a cover story?
-More likely illegal space aliens are squatting out there waiting on obama to grant them amnesty.

2. During a campaign stop for democratic congressmen in Detroit, President Obama was overheard saying into his cell phone either “. . . what will the little green men think . . . ” or “. . . what will Michelle have to drink . . .”
-No self-respecting alien would hang with obama.

3. A former aide who once worked for Nancy Pelosi claimed that she wore a “human mask” over her very alien face and that she blamed her appearance on plastic surgery gone wrong. Is the Speaker of the House an alien version of the Manchurian candidate?
-Hmmmm this explains a few things.

4. Vice President Joe Biden was observed riding an “anti-gravity” sled outside his residence in Washington by a paparazzi photographer who climbed a tree to get a shot inside the compound. His camera was confiscated by secret service agents.
-The vice actually crashed an atv and it became an “anti-gravity sled” once the dumbass knocked the wheels off. The hard landing at the end resulted in the brain damage that he displays daily. (more…)

Will Washington’s Failures Lead To Second American Revolution?

2 August, 2010

I spent a good portion of Saturday night drinking with one of Tampa’s finest. We talked about the possibility of a mini revolution. We both agreed that if there is even a hint of a cheating scandal in the mid terms that blood would likely flow. There are just too many special interests and emotions are high. America will stand or fall this year. An America without personal freedoms would not be worthy of the name.

Almost a fifth of Florida residents can legally carry now; ammunition is still high but more plentiful than it has been. People are stocking up, are you?

My friend shocked me when he told me that every Tampa officer he knew had discussed walking off the job if a “national emergency” was declared around the time of the mid term elections and strict gun control measures were put into place. Even the police do not trust congress. I just hope the police officers closet to congress also discussed walking off the job. No member of congress should be any better protected in a “national emergency” than you and your families are.

By the end of the night, we had planned how to wreck Tampa. It is a lot easier when you have an insider telling you were the weak points are. As fun as that discussion was, we both knew that retired military or sitting police officers would not start any revolution. We would however fight if it comes to that, not to topple governments or defend a failed state. No, if this happens it will be to protect and defend our own neighborhoods, well minus the obama supporters. My friend reminded me that almost all the bumper stickers had been removed but I still have my list. I plan to kick them out of the neighborhood and let them fend for themselves. Maybe the will find some liberals to protect them

Read this article and you will see that my friend and I are not the only people thinking that violence is almost a given.


The Internet is a large-scale version of the “Committees of Correspondence” that led to the first American Revolution — and with Washington’s failings now so obvious and awful, it may lead to another.

People are asking, “Is the government doing us more harm than good? Should we change what it does and the way it does it?”

Pruning the power of government begins with the imperial presidency.

Too many overreaching laws give the president too much discretion to make too many open-ended rules controlling too many aspects of our lives. There’s no end to the harm an out-of-control president can do.

Bill Clinton lowered the culture, moral tone and strength of the nation — and left America vulnerable to attack. When it came, George W. Bush stood up for America, albeit sometimes clumsily.

Barack Obama, however, has pulled off the ultimate switcheroo: He’s diminishing America from within — so far, successfully.

He may soon bankrupt us and replace our big merit-based capitalist economy with a small government-directed one of his own design.

He is undermining our constitutional traditions: The rule of law and our Anglo-Saxon concepts of private property hang in the balance. Obama may be the most “consequential” president ever.
-I am more survivalist than I am an anarchist and I could be wrong about armed revolutionists encountering radical special agenda groups but just in case I am not wrong, prepare. (more…)

%d bloggers like this: