Commies Seize Control of Financial Sector

Historically, whenever the federal government takes control over a large chunk of the  private sector, the economy tanks.  Get ready for that double-dip:

Senate Passes Sweeping Finance Overhaul

By VICTORIA MCGRANE  And MICHAEL R. CRITTENDEN – WSJ

WASHINGTON—The Senate approved a wide-ranging overhaul of the nation’s financial regulations Thursday, handing President Barack Obama his second major domestic-policy victory of the year.

The legislation passed, 60-39, largely along party lines. Republicans Sens. Scott Brown of Massachusetts, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, both of Maine, joined Democrats in supporting the bill. Sen. Russ Feingold (D., Wisc.) was the only Democrat to vote against the measure.

[What?  You thought Scott Brown was going to swoop in and save the day or something?  Phhhhttt!  Yeah, right.  He’s another “Progressive” Republican.]

The GOP votes were only secured in recent days after some last-minute changes were made to satisfy concerns of the Republican swing voters over how to pay for the bill.

The bill, which Mr. Obama expects to sign into law next week, marks a sea change for the financial-services industry. Mammoth financial firms such as J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Bank of America Corp. face major changes to almost every part of their businesses, from debit cards to derivatives trading and the ability to invest in hedge funds.

[Did you know that J.P. Morgan saved the United States from complete financial collapse—not once, but twice?!!

Dust off your American history books and check out the years  1895 and 1907.

My, my, my— I’m thinking the Commies are still pretty sore about that and this is all part of their revenge…]

Not only will they face new leverage and capital requirements, but also regulators with broad new authority to curb or outlaw risky behavior. The changes are in store despite Wall Street’s aggressive efforts over the last year to water down or derail the bill.

[Gee, ya’ think Wall Street will go into Bull mode or Bear mode tomorrow?  Place yer bets!]

The measure, once implemented, will touch all areas of the financial markets, affecting how consumers obtain credit cards and mortgages, dictating how the government dismantles failing financial firms and directing federal regulators’ focus on potential flashpoints in the economy.

[I’m just curious; how does one identify a  “potential flashpoint” in the economy?  Sounds pretty nebulous, if you ask me.  Of course, nebulousness is one of the hallmarks of commie legislation.]

The legislation will radically alter the way regulators work to assess and respond to potential flashpoints in the economy. The Federal Reserve will be empowered to supervise the largest and most complex financial firms, working in tandem with a new Financial Stability Oversight Council made up of financial regulators that will have the ability to act aggressively against potential risks.

Minutes after the bill’s passage, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the legislation “represents a welcome and far-reaching step toward preventing a replay of the recent financial crisis.”

[Spoken like a true Keynesian moron.]

The work of remaking the financial-regulatory regime, however, remains far from finished.

[Another hallmark of Commie legislation is legislation which allows them to keep adding and adding to the original legislation—all the while bypassing the House and Senate.  The EPA presents a fine example of how all this works…]

Thursday’s vote effectively opens a second phase of lobbying and policy making as financial regulators begin to shape the rules and framework laid out in the legislation. That rule-making process will determine how the new law affects those ranging from traders of complicated derivatives to consumers shopping for a mortgage or a credit card.

“This vote this afternoon is a starting point, not an ending point,” Sen. Byron Dorgan (D., N.D.) said on the Senate floor.

Lawmakers had to negotiate a variety of flashpoints throughout the yearlong process to craft the legislation. Key sticking points included the creation of an agency to police financial products offered to consumers, how exotic derivatives products should be regulated and how to limit the riskiest practices of the nation’s biggest banks.

[Yup, you’ve got it:  Expanding government while creating new agencies is yet another hallmark of Commie legislation…]

The final legislation endorses a series of compromises on those issues. The Obama administration’s push to create a consumer agency was agreed to, though lawmakers and industry groups secured some limited exemptions for certain types of firms. That agency will also be tasked with drawing up and enforcing new rules for mortgage lending included in the bill and aimed at preventing the abuses that helped contribute to the housing collapse.

[Do you really trust Our Dark Overlord to staff it with Capitalists and Conservatives?  My money is on more freakin’ Keynesians and Marxist Lefturds!]

Lawmakers also settled on a more limited proposal to require federally backed banks to split off their lucrative swaps-trading businesses. Banks will be required to move some of their trading operations to affiliated companies and face new limits on their ability to make investments in hedge and private-equity funds.

[And, with that, the federal government has just set off a nuclear chain-reaction in heart of the financial sector.

It’s really a quite simple concept to grasp and has been proven over and over again throughout America’s 230-plus-year history:

Less capital for banks = fewer bank loans to customers which translates into fewer business loans, fewer home loans; less corporate R&D money; increased bankruptcies; more failed businesses; more layoffs, etc., etc.]

Regulators would also for the first time be given the authority to seize and break up large financial- services firms that pose a risk to the broader economy or are on the brink of collapse.

[Communism, pure and simple.]

The delicate compromises and arm-twisting continued until just a few days before the final vote. Senate Banking Chairman Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.) labored to corral the 60 votes he would need to overcome the procedural roadblocks Republicans planned to throw in the measure’s way.

In search of votes, House and Senate Democrats took the rare step of reopening the House and Senate “conference” negotiations to replace a provision paying for the legislation through a multibillion-dollar fee on large banks and hedge funds. The proposal raised protests from several Senate Republicans on whose support the bill depended, especially Sen. Scott Brown (R., Mass.).

[Can you say, “unconstitutional?”]

Instead, lawmakers adopted a two-pronged approach to covering the bill’s estimated $16 billion cost by forcing an early end to the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program and increasing the deposit-insurance fee paid by banks to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

[Oh, crap.  Now the banks which are already teetering on the edge of bankruptcy will be pushed off the cliff…  More failed banks, more economic turmoil.]

The change led Mr. Brown, Ms. Collins and Ms. Snowe to announce they would vote for the final bill.

The largely party-line vote illustrated the rift between Republicans and Democrats on how the government should respond to the 2008 financial crisis. That debate continued Thursday.

“The legislation empowers consumers and also transparency in the financial system,” said Sen. Jack Reed (D., R.I.) at a press conference. “You’re either voting for the American people…or you’re voting for entrenched financial interests.”

By contrast, Republicans insisted the heavy new regulations would force jobs overseas. They also said it would hurt small businesses while not dealing with the fundamental problems of the economy.

The Senate Agriculture Committee’s ranking Republican, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, said new rules for over-the-counter derivatives would hamper small and medium-size businesses’ access to credit.

“This legislation will enable regulators to impose restrictions on businesses that had absolutely nothing to do with the financial crisis,” he said.

Exactly!  By the way, where is that sweeping overhaul of Fannie and Freddie in all of this?  Nowhere to be found…

Explore posts in the same categories: congress sucks, Economics, Economy, Get a G.R.I.P., Obama Sucks, politics, Sucky Senators

11 Comments on “Commies Seize Control of Financial Sector”

  1. tgusa Says:

    Scott Brown is enraged because leftists are calling his daughters prostitutes. At some point the rest of us have to say, you know what Scott you own it get used to it. My allotment of sympathy for stupidity is all used up. Play with these people and you get whatever they decide you deserve.

  2. Big Frank Says:

    Not his daughters Scott Brown is has prostituted himself and voted with the predictable RINO crowd. The RINOS and the DemocRATS are now marching in locked step with our ‘Dear Leader’ and are guilty of aiding and abetting the criminal transfer of power from the elected representatives of the people to the executive. All of these new legislative acts in their 2000+ pages still are not clear and the administration can make up the rules and regulations and change them at it’s whim. It’s just another step towards our ‘Dear Leaders’ Socialist state, a state where the destruction and impoverishment of the middle class, will leave them dependent on the state for even basic needs.

    • tgusa Says:

      They can’t take us where we will not willingly go. I suppose they could try throwing us in camps like they did to Japanese Americans during WWII. Of course they are dealing with a whole different crowd this time.

  3. tgusa Says:

    Havent the north eastern democrats caused enogh misery and trouble, I mean, they did bring us 9-11 courtesy of their policies. We should have nailed them at the time for what they did, by letting them escape responsibility we have ended up right where we are today. Personally, I have had much more than enough!

  4. tgusa Says:

    Heres the scenario, You are Obama, you know your dad was not an American citizen. You know you are not constitutionally eligible. You know that if anyone ever finds out everything you have done is undone. So knowing this do you go ahead a throw everything at us understanding that you have nothing to lose and perhaps everything to gain by doing it?

    18 months ago obama was riding high and they really thought that he would save them. There was little chance of anyone penetrating his support base. Well now things are different so what do you do? Well that would explain the racist crap that is being tossed around everytime anyone disagrees with Obama.

    Obama is in trouble, he and his hardcore supporters are worried, they had to do something. So I am going to begin doing something too, I am going to shout, show me the citizenship papers of Baracks father. Eventually we will have law and order again, if not we really don’t have a country, eventually we will prove the lie, the criminal act, when we do everything they have done is undone immediatly, by one sweeping act. Then I want to go after felons like Franken. Dirtbags like Schumer (did you know that NYC police can feel you up for absolutly no reason in NYC? Can you say Arizona.), the delusional like Pelosi.

    I want all their butts in front of a jury but first I want Obamas dads documents. By the way, college documents pertaining to student loans or grants have both your parents names and places of birth on them. My bet is obama the mooch used his dads African heritage to qualify for free stuff.

    They know this, hence the racist charges tossed about recklessly. Its reckless cause they know they have everything to lose.


    • Meanwhile, today, all the stock markets all over the world are sinking like a rock on news of regulatory deform:

      http://www.marketwatch.com/

      Gee, like we all didn’t see that one coming!

      Cheers

      • tgusa Says:

        yes, we knew their policies would fail…but they really believed they could succeed. If it is true that a lie repeated becomes the truth (in 1940) I would say that the truth repeated (in 2010) becomes..the truth?

        Nudge.

        Thanks for the link.
        Cheers.

        • tgusa Says:

          Oh yeah, here’s something you will find…well..predictable. Free Republic; Ca companies flee state tyranny. Burn it down! Thats their strategy!


          • Shades of Atlas Shrugged…

            Cheers

          • tgusa Says:

            I have a lot of sales people that come to my door and for awhile now I have told them, I would not spend a nickel here until there is a rules change, until the theft, the handouts stop and we return to constitutionally based freedom. I tell them to go back and tell their boss what I said and then for him to tell the state guvmint. I say, if you don’t do this, well, pretty soon you won’t need to come calling here cause people like me won’t be here to provide you with work. You should see the look on their faces.


Leave a comment