Obama’s “Plumbers”

Possibly confirming what we’ve long suspected?:

Obama’s Plumbers
09/12/2008 – Human Events
John Batchelor

There is a secret group in the Obama-Biden campaign tasked with shutting off any leaks from the record that links Barack Obama to his longtime adviser and mentor Bill Ayers, professor of education at the University of Illinois and unrepentant Weatherman terrorist and fugitive from the 1970s.

This surprising fact has been developed by Chicago-born and Ralph Nader-supporting Professor Steve Diamond of Santa Clara University Law School, who maintains the Global Labor and Politics blog and has pieced together over many months the unusual surreptitious activity around the public records of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) grant now housed at the University of Illinois and Brown University.

Since the spring, Diamond has led the investigation into the intimate working relationship between Obama and Ayers that dates back at least to the beginning of 1995 and the Chicago Annenberg Challenge Grants.

Diamond believes this group is not harmless. “It’s a ‘Plumbers’ unit. You know, we are old enough to recall the Plumbers in Richard Nixon’s White House. This is like that. The job is to stop anyone trying to use the (Chicago) Annenberg (Challenge) papers to figure out how Ayers and Obama worked together on education.”

The “Plumbers” were a Nixon administration fiasco, the so-called secret White House Special Investigative Unit 24 tasked to stop the leaks of classified material. Once revealed, the Plumbers unit led to more bizarre discoveries that culminated in the Watergate impeachment and resignation of Richard Nixon in 1974.

Diamond believes this Obama-Biden “Plumbers” unit was responsible for the harassment of Stanley Kurtz of National Review, who sought access to public records of the now defunct CAC at the University of Illinois Library in Chicago in mid-August. He also believes it may have played a part in frustrating his own investigation of similar CAC records in the papers of the nationwide Annenberg Challenge program that are housed at Brown University. The question now is who among the major figures in the Chicago progressive circle, as well as former Annenberg Challenge officials, are unofficial members of Obama’s Plumbers? And who among other responsible officials of the University of Illinois are their unwitting allies?

There is a substantial independent report from a major Democratic source that confirms Diamond’s suspicions. The source confirms the unit is led by Bill Ayers himself and likely includes Tom Hayden and other members of “Progressives for Obama.” Most critically, the Democratic source says this unit has direct access to media adviser David Axelrod of the Obama-Biden campaign.

Obama has struggled since the primary contest with Mrs. Clinton last spring to avoid answering candidly about his relationship with Ayers. His motivation is entirely obvious, seeking to avoid the political damage that would result from exposure of his friendship with a strident radical who posed standing on an American flag to promote his 2001 autobiography “Fugitive Days” and who was quoted in the New York Times on September 11, 2001 as saying, “There’s a certain eloquence to bombs.”

In April 2008, Obama, speaking to George Stephanopoulos, described Ayers — as if from a great distance — as “a guy who lived in my neighborhood.” Obama also mislead Stephanopoulos with the peculiar characterization of Ayers as “a professor of English.” In September, Obama dropped the brittle pose of not knowing intimate details about Ayers and told Bill O’Reilly, “I haven’t seen the guy in a year and a half,” and, “I come to Chicago. He’s working with Mayor Richard Daley, not known to be a radical. So, he and I know each other as a consequence of work he’s doing on education. That is not an endorsement of his views.”

Obama went on to answer a question that O’Reilly actually did not ask in the course of the conversation. Obama declared, “This guy is not part of my campaign. He’s not some adviser of mine.”

The leaking that the “Plumbers” unit has blocked so far began last spring when Diamond posted several literate articles on his Global Labor and Politics blog on how Obama, an outsider to Chicago, had risen so swiftly in the Cook County machine.

On June 18, Diamond posted “That Guy Who Lives in My Neighborhood,” in which he discussed the CAC for the first time, using research he’d done from the CAC papers on file at Brown University. Diamond was puzzled when an additional request to Brown for more information was met with silence; and he now wonders if this was an oversight or the work of the “Plumbers.”

Kurtz ran into the Plumber unit August 11 when he requested CAC documents at the University of Illinois library in Chicago. Kurtz was denied access, and there have been several inconsistent explanations as to why. What is now believed more accurate is that the former executive director of the CAC, Ken Rolling, who was a long-standing associate of both Ayers and Obama, contacted the library officials to stop Kurtz’s inquiry.

There are inconsistent statements made by Rolling about the reason for and timing of his intervention, and he told the Chicago Tribune that he got involved because of surfing on the net from his home in Mississippi, despite the fact that there was no mention of the CAC on the net before August 11 — except in Steve Diamond’s blog.

What is clear is that by mid-August Rolling was in communication with major University of Illinois officials, including B. Joseph White, the university’s president, Thomas Bearrows, the university’s counsel, and Tom Hardy, the university’s executive director for university relations. An August 23 Ken Rolling e-mail to Bearrows (obtained by the Freedom of Information Act) points to telephone communications the day before between all of the principals involved in the decision to withhold the documents from Kurtz and others.

What is not answered at this time is when and why Rolling was in regular contact with university officials, though the few facts indicate Rolling began his interference — and Diamond calls him “the lead Plumber” — at exactly the same time Kurtz made his request: August 11. Did a university official give Rolling a heads-up?

Most significantly, the August 23 e-mail indicates a range of materials that Rolling wants to review personally and to restrict in the documents. “I can be at the UIC library between 9:00 am and 10:00 am on Monday August 25 to review the files.” Much of the material Rolling aimed to review relates to the first year of the CAC, 1995, when Ayers and Obama were most active together in making decisions on the large cash awards. Thanks to the FOIA, we know the response by Bearrows to Rolling’s request was suggestive — “as promised, we will carefully consider the concerns that you identify…”

Importantly, we do know that at least one of the awards in 1995, the largest that year, went to a group led by Ayers and his partner and fellow radical Mike Klonsky.

Who is Ken Rolling? He was a member of the Woods Foundation board that was responsible for awarding the grant that first brought Barack Obama to Chicago as a community organizer. Later, Ayers is said to have been involved in choosing Rolling to be executive director of the CAC.

It seems more than coincidence that Obama, as a 33 year-old junior lawyer at a modest Chicago law firm, was then brought onto the CAC board as chairman, despite the prominence of other members that included two university presidents. In a September 10 New York Times article on Obama and education that mentions Ayers and depends upon Rolling as an informant, one of the presidents, Stanley O. Ikenberry of the University of Illinois, remembered about the choice of Obama as chair, “It was unusual: here you had a person trained in the law chairing a board on school reform.”

The CAC documents were again opened to the public on August 26, several days after the exchange of information between Rolling and library officials. We await Stanley Kurtz’s forthcoming articles to explicate the details of the Ayers-Obama-Rolling CAC working relationship. What is not clear is whether or not all the CAC materials are yet available for the full discovery of the relationship between the unrepentant radical Ayers and the guarded presidential candidate Obama.

John Batchelor is a novelist and the host of the John Batchelor Show on WABC in New York and KFI in Los Angeles.

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

14 Comments on “Obama’s “Plumbers””


  1. This is crap. There is no secret group. I’m running ‘Progressives for Obama’, and my reading this phony story is the first I’ve heard of such a thing, even though I supposedly have a hand in running it. Ayers has assigned himself the task of doing NOTHING regardingf the campaign; he’s got his hands full improving our schools. Diamond is a hatchet-job-guy who can’t get his facts straight, not a serious researcher, and has a penchant for making long lists of JEWS as Obama backers. Don’t be played for a sucker by this crap. If you believe this, I’ve got a batch of penny stocks for sale…

  2. tgusa Says:

    The democrats, their supporters along with the media throughout this campaign have showed themselves to be the biggest criminal conspiracy in US history. I used to think they were just, not too bright, now I understand the truth. Some people will holler that I have to respect Barack because he is a senator. Well I don’t care who those terror supporting fools in Chicago send to Washington, I’m an American who has great respect for the constitution. I can spot an enemy of it easily, foreign or domestic, terrorist professor or terrorist affiliated candidate. I know many people here have dems in their family I do too and I have to ask, how stupid are you people? There’s no excuse for it, you cant be trusted, I have to write you off even if you are my brother. They aren’t, my brothers are patriotic Americans.


  3. Carl,

    Gee, that’s interesting because Stanley Kurtz has come to the same conclusion…

    You know Kurtz, don’t you?

    You know, they guy who was being interviewed during the DNC convention and you commies flooded the phone lines to keep legitimate callers from calling in???

    And, do you really think that Nixon told his cabinet members about his “Plumbers???”

    Just because you don’t know about it does not make it untrue.

    Also, just because I suspect it, does not make it true.

    However, based on what I have personally observed, it certainly would explain a lot…

    BTW – You do know that “Progressive” is a Communist Party code word, don’t you? Or, are you just that naive?

  4. tgusa Says:

    Good article on commie speak Doc. I know you understand it so do I. Growing up listening to it as we have makes it easy for us to spot. Funny though, all the ruthless commie dicktaters of our youth, where’d they go? Oh yeah, America. Even China is not quite as commie as they used to be they have been reduced to the likes of the Venezuelan Mussolini, Polonium Putin, or PP, not really a step up. These new commies are but a tingle up the leg of those from the past. Still dangerous and not to be underestimated but still we are making progress against the, err, progressives.


  5. tgusa,

    The commie speak link isn’t parsing.

    Go ahead and paste in the entire URL link.

    Cheers


  6. tgusa,

    Alright, that works!

    Cheers

  7. tgusa Says:

    Great, sorry for littering. Im siting here watching Foxnews (muted) as they use and reuse the word/s, work, worker, working people. I’ll keep an eye out for “toil”.


  8. tgusa,

    LOL!

    Yeah, right now, I’m “toiling” over the article you linked. Love the piggy bank! So true!

    Cheers

  9. tgusa Says:

    I was just thinking, we have the czar of this and that. Isn’t that just a teeny bit contradictory? What is it going to be is it toiling or czaring? Oh yeah, we do the toiling they do the czaring. Looks like us patriots have our “work” cut out for us.

  10. memaw Says:

    As a note: I remember Nixon saying, the communist weren’t going to destroy our country from the outside. It would be from the inside. Is that not what we are seeing…We have got to open our eyes to the truth!!!! We’ve got to rise up and fight the communism and Islamic propaganda that is destroying our country from within.!


  11. Davidson is right about one thing. I do not know if there is such a group and I did not tell Batchelor there was. There are unanswered questions about why Ken Rolling called the University of Illinois and asked them to block public access to the CAC documents.

    But Batchelor made up the idea that I actually think there is a Plumbers Unit and he made up quotes from me as well.

    Davidson, howver, should stop slandering me including calling me an anti-semite. Below is a copy of the letter I sent to Human Events. I have also sent a copy to Davidson so he should know better.

    The story in Human Events that relies on alleged quotes from me is wrong.

    I have no knowledge of any “plumbers unit” inside the Obama campaign.

    I was not interviewed by Human Events for this story. In fact, I explicitly declined an interview with the author, John Batchelor, when asked, in writing.

    I did tell Mr. Batchelor that he was free, as is anyone else, to quote directly from the blog. However, the article does not do that, instead it makes up quotes that do not appear on the blog and that I did not say.

    My blog Global Labor has a well established track record for relying on what I know to be true and providing the documentation for what I write there, only occasionally speculating on what the known facts add up to. I did make tongue in cheek references to plumbers-like activity (which I have now removed) but based on what I know I cannot even theorize the existence of a “plumbers unit” – a reference to a group hired by the Nixon campaign to engage in break ins and other shenanigans – inside the Obama campaign.

    All I know, and as far as I know all anyone in the public arena knows, is that

    Ken Rolling, the former Executive Director of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge called the University of Illinois at Chicago on August 11 in response to what Rolling says were reports on the web about records of the CAC.
    He told the University that they could not release the records they held of the Challenge, which were donated to the University for public access and research in 2002.
    The University initially complied with his request and two weeks later concluded that Mr. Rolling was wrong and that the records could be once again opened to the public.
    Stanley Kurtz of the National Review called the University that same day, August 11, and was told that he could have access to the CAC records
    The next day, August 12, Dr. Kurtz was told that, in fact, the records were closed.
    Separately, earlier in the summer I asked the Annenberg Institute at Brown University for copies of certain CAC records which they readily provided.
    After I posted a blog on what those records contained I followed up my request for some additional information.
    Brown never replied to those requests

    If Human Events or John Batchelor wants to spin those facts into an allegation that there is, in fact, a real Plumbers Unit inside the Obama campaign they are, of course, free to do so. They cannot, however, rely on me to do so.

    Thank you for the opportunity to respond.


  12. Steve,

    Thank you for the update and for setting the record straight.

    I enjoyed your website immensely and have added it to our blogroll under “Global Labor.”

    Cheers


Leave a comment