No doubt many of you have heard the comment by Barack Obama that may or may not be referring to Gov. Palin and Senator McCain:
“That’s not change,” Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said of what Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is offering.
“You know, you can put lipstick on a pig,” Obama said, “but it’s still a pig.”
The crowd rose and applauded, some of them no doubt thinking he may have been alluding to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s ad lib during her vice presidential nomination acceptance speech last week, “What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick.”
“You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called ‘change,'” Obama continued, “it’s still gonna stink after eight years.
“We’ve had enough of the same old thing! It’s time to bring about real change to Washington. And that’s the choice you’ve got in this election.”
Now, I was willing to give Senator Obama the benefit of the doubt when his Ministry of Propaganda said that he was just using an old expression and was not referring to Gov. Palin’s now famous Hockey Mom /Lipstick comment viewed by almost all of America during the GOP convention, however, as I was fact checking this story, I discovered something VERY interesting:
The National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL) is a major supporter of the Obama campaign. NARAL is anti-McCain and anti-Palin to such an extent that it borders on psychotic! They even use McCain as a tool to scare pro-abortionists into signing up with them!
Now, I mention all this because National Review Online (NRO) has a quick little blurb from September 04, 2008 where NARAL was sending out a Press Release using the “Lipstick on a Pig” in reference to Sarah Palin:
“Lipstick on a Pig” [Ramesh Ponnuru]
“NARAL is sending out a press release playing on Palin’s lipstick comment from last night:
Gov. Palin had a good applause line last night about hockey moms and lipstick on pitbulls. Well, we have an expression here, too: Dress it up any way you like, but the McCain-Palin rhetoric about women’s freedom and privacy is nothing more than lipstick on a pig!
09/04 06:56 PM”
I have tried to find this Press Release on NARAL’s website, but have been unsuccessful. You see, that’s the odd thing; the Press Release isn’t there! I am pretty darn sure that a news source such as NRO would not have manufactured a story like that! Nor, would they have had any idea that Barack Obama would be using such a phrase a few days later…
We have seen instances in the past with Obama’s Minister of Propaganda covering up tell-tale tracks when it comes to information that is damaging. So, now I sit here wondering what happened to the NARAL Press Release, and did Obama really think that his “lipstick on a pig” comment would not be “misinterpreted” as anything else but a jab at Gov. Palin? Especially since he added in that smelly old fish metaphor which, when paired together with the Lipstick comment, could be mistaken for nothing else but a jab at McCain?
After careful consideration, and based on previous examples from the Obama camp, I’m pretty confident that Senator Obama actually did mean it as a metaphor for Sarah Palin; knowing full well that he would be able to get away with it by playing it off as a misinterpretation by “stupid” Americans because he was, after all, “just using an old expression.”
Not to mention that he also knows that the MSM is so fatuously enamored with him that they will believe and regurgitate anything he tells them…
Yup, he says he’s for “Change” but all I see is more of the same old dirty politics…
But, that was pretty bloody sneaky of him, I’ll give him that…
Opinionated Infidels