Yet another flap over pictures of the worlds most famous pedophile. As with all things Islam there is no consensus as to the exact rules covering the viewing and posting of these pictures. Some Muslims accept them, as they should because Muslims painted them and other Muslims want to erase his image.
Well I have a few things to say about this subject so ….
February 6 2008, Fox
Online encyclopedia Wikipedia has again stirred up controversy — this time over a biographical entry on the prophet Muhammad.
-Darn and Wikipedia has such an outstanding reputation as a source of factual knowledge.
Nearly 100,000 people worldwide have signed a Web-based petition asking Wikipedia to remove all depictions of the Prophet from its English-language entry, viewable on the wikipedia site
-100,000 from a billion and a half is squat, leave the pedophile alone.
“I request all brothers and sisters to sign this petitions so we can tell Wikipedia to respect the religion and remove the illustrations,” the creator of the petition at The Petition Site asks.
-What they are really mad at is Mohammed is presented as a vertically challenged weirdo playing with his balls as other Muslims watch.
Opposition among Muslims to images of Muhammad has its roots in the prohibition of “graven images” in the Ten Commandments, but has varied over time.
-This issue is important as work stopped in Islamic countries when the story broke. Muslims are running all over the place screaming about having bigger balls than the prophet. Kinda sick if you ask me. (more…)
Opinionated Infidels